Cargando…

The quest for a mechanistic understanding of biodiversity–ecosystem services relationships

Ecosystem services (ES) approaches to biodiversity conservation are currently high on the ecological research and policy agendas. However, despite a wealth of studies into biodiversity's role in maintaining ES (B–ES relationships) across landscapes, we still lack generalities in the nature and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duncan, Clare, Thompson, Julian R., Pettorelli, Nathalie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4633867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26468240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1348
_version_ 1782399272205942784
author Duncan, Clare
Thompson, Julian R.
Pettorelli, Nathalie
author_facet Duncan, Clare
Thompson, Julian R.
Pettorelli, Nathalie
author_sort Duncan, Clare
collection PubMed
description Ecosystem services (ES) approaches to biodiversity conservation are currently high on the ecological research and policy agendas. However, despite a wealth of studies into biodiversity's role in maintaining ES (B–ES relationships) across landscapes, we still lack generalities in the nature and strengths of these linkages. Reasons for this are manifold, but can largely be attributed to (i) a lack of adherence to definitions and thus a confusion between final ES and the ecosystem functions (EFs) underpinning them, (ii) a focus on uninformative biodiversity indices and singular hypotheses and (iii) top-down analyses across large spatial scales and overlooking of context-dependency. The biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (B–EF) field provides an alternate context for examining biodiversity's mechanistic role in shaping ES, focusing on species' characteristics that may drive EFs via multiple mechanisms across contexts. Despite acknowledgements of a need for B–ES research to look towards underlying B–EF linkages, the connections between these areas of research remains weak. With this review, we pull together recent B–EF findings to identify key areas for future developments in B–ES research. We highlight a means by which B–ES research may begin to identify how and when multiple underlying B–EF relationships may scale to final ES delivery and trade-offs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4633867
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46338672015-11-05 The quest for a mechanistic understanding of biodiversity–ecosystem services relationships Duncan, Clare Thompson, Julian R. Pettorelli, Nathalie Proc Biol Sci Review Articles Ecosystem services (ES) approaches to biodiversity conservation are currently high on the ecological research and policy agendas. However, despite a wealth of studies into biodiversity's role in maintaining ES (B–ES relationships) across landscapes, we still lack generalities in the nature and strengths of these linkages. Reasons for this are manifold, but can largely be attributed to (i) a lack of adherence to definitions and thus a confusion between final ES and the ecosystem functions (EFs) underpinning them, (ii) a focus on uninformative biodiversity indices and singular hypotheses and (iii) top-down analyses across large spatial scales and overlooking of context-dependency. The biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (B–EF) field provides an alternate context for examining biodiversity's mechanistic role in shaping ES, focusing on species' characteristics that may drive EFs via multiple mechanisms across contexts. Despite acknowledgements of a need for B–ES research to look towards underlying B–EF linkages, the connections between these areas of research remains weak. With this review, we pull together recent B–EF findings to identify key areas for future developments in B–ES research. We highlight a means by which B–ES research may begin to identify how and when multiple underlying B–EF relationships may scale to final ES delivery and trade-offs. The Royal Society 2015-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4633867/ /pubmed/26468240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1348 Text en © 2015 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Duncan, Clare
Thompson, Julian R.
Pettorelli, Nathalie
The quest for a mechanistic understanding of biodiversity–ecosystem services relationships
title The quest for a mechanistic understanding of biodiversity–ecosystem services relationships
title_full The quest for a mechanistic understanding of biodiversity–ecosystem services relationships
title_fullStr The quest for a mechanistic understanding of biodiversity–ecosystem services relationships
title_full_unstemmed The quest for a mechanistic understanding of biodiversity–ecosystem services relationships
title_short The quest for a mechanistic understanding of biodiversity–ecosystem services relationships
title_sort quest for a mechanistic understanding of biodiversity–ecosystem services relationships
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4633867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26468240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1348
work_keys_str_mv AT duncanclare thequestforamechanisticunderstandingofbiodiversityecosystemservicesrelationships
AT thompsonjulianr thequestforamechanisticunderstandingofbiodiversityecosystemservicesrelationships
AT pettorellinathalie thequestforamechanisticunderstandingofbiodiversityecosystemservicesrelationships
AT duncanclare questforamechanisticunderstandingofbiodiversityecosystemservicesrelationships
AT thompsonjulianr questforamechanisticunderstandingofbiodiversityecosystemservicesrelationships
AT pettorellinathalie questforamechanisticunderstandingofbiodiversityecosystemservicesrelationships