Cargando…
Postreduction Breast Augmentation
Most breast reduction patients are highly satisfied after surgery. However, there is a subset of women who seek breast augmentation years later to restore lost volume chiefly associated with weight loss and postpartum changes. Breast shape and overall aesthetics are often revised at the same time. M...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4634164/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000479 |
_version_ | 1782399304422391808 |
---|---|
author | Hidalgo, David A. Doft, Melissa A. |
author_facet | Hidalgo, David A. Doft, Melissa A. |
author_sort | Hidalgo, David A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most breast reduction patients are highly satisfied after surgery. However, there is a subset of women who seek breast augmentation years later to restore lost volume chiefly associated with weight loss and postpartum changes. Breast shape and overall aesthetics are often revised at the same time. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 2 surgeons’ experiences with post-reduction breast augmentation. Twenty patients were identified between 2002 and 2014. An in-depth chart review was conducted to determine patient motivation and to examine the operative techniques employed. Implant variables, a reduction specimen weight to implant volume comparison (where available), and complications are reported. RESULTS: The average age was 37.1 years and average body mass index was 21.8 kg/m(2). Most patients waited over a decade to have their breasts revised. Weight loss was the motivating factor in 8 patients and pregnancy changes in 11. Nineteen patients wished to stay with the same bra size or 1 cup size larger. Although all patients elected to have an implant placed, 19 patients wished to have an improved breast shape, not specifically a larger volume. The average breast implant was 203.5 cm(3) (range, 120–340 cm(3)). Complications from implant placement included a seroma treated by aspiration and a Baker class III capsular contracture that required surgical correction. CONCLUSIONS: A small subset of reduction mammaplasty patients seek breast augmentation many years later primarily to improve breast contour, not to restore their prereduction breast volumes. Conservative augmentation combined with revision of breast shape and areolar aesthetics yields good results with minimal complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4634164 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46341642015-11-17 Postreduction Breast Augmentation Hidalgo, David A. Doft, Melissa A. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article Most breast reduction patients are highly satisfied after surgery. However, there is a subset of women who seek breast augmentation years later to restore lost volume chiefly associated with weight loss and postpartum changes. Breast shape and overall aesthetics are often revised at the same time. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 2 surgeons’ experiences with post-reduction breast augmentation. Twenty patients were identified between 2002 and 2014. An in-depth chart review was conducted to determine patient motivation and to examine the operative techniques employed. Implant variables, a reduction specimen weight to implant volume comparison (where available), and complications are reported. RESULTS: The average age was 37.1 years and average body mass index was 21.8 kg/m(2). Most patients waited over a decade to have their breasts revised. Weight loss was the motivating factor in 8 patients and pregnancy changes in 11. Nineteen patients wished to stay with the same bra size or 1 cup size larger. Although all patients elected to have an implant placed, 19 patients wished to have an improved breast shape, not specifically a larger volume. The average breast implant was 203.5 cm(3) (range, 120–340 cm(3)). Complications from implant placement included a seroma treated by aspiration and a Baker class III capsular contracture that required surgical correction. CONCLUSIONS: A small subset of reduction mammaplasty patients seek breast augmentation many years later primarily to improve breast contour, not to restore their prereduction breast volumes. Conservative augmentation combined with revision of breast shape and areolar aesthetics yields good results with minimal complications. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4634164/ /pubmed/26579333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000479 Text en Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hidalgo, David A. Doft, Melissa A. Postreduction Breast Augmentation |
title | Postreduction Breast Augmentation |
title_full | Postreduction Breast Augmentation |
title_fullStr | Postreduction Breast Augmentation |
title_full_unstemmed | Postreduction Breast Augmentation |
title_short | Postreduction Breast Augmentation |
title_sort | postreduction breast augmentation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4634164/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000479 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hidalgodavida postreductionbreastaugmentation AT doftmelissaa postreductionbreastaugmentation |