Cargando…

Scalp Surgery: Quantitative Analysis of Follicular Unit Growth

Over the years, different kinds of hair transplantation have been compared in an attempt to overcome male pattern alopecia and, at the same time, maximize both the survival and growth rate of grafted hair. In this study, we have assessed the survival and growth rate of follicular units (FU) in an in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raposio, Edoardo, Caruana, Giorgia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4634176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000524
_version_ 1782399307171758080
author Raposio, Edoardo
Caruana, Giorgia
author_facet Raposio, Edoardo
Caruana, Giorgia
author_sort Raposio, Edoardo
collection PubMed
description Over the years, different kinds of hair transplantation have been compared in an attempt to overcome male pattern alopecia and, at the same time, maximize both the survival and growth rate of grafted hair. In this study, we have assessed the survival and growth rate of follicular units (FU) in an in vitro model, as compared with that of conventional hair micrografts, to experimentally evaluate and elaborate on the differences between these 2 approaches in hair transplantation procedures. METHODS: Group A (control; n = 100 follicles) was composed of hair micrografts, whereas FUs were assigned to Group B (experimental; n = 100 follicles, n = 35 FUs). Each group was cultured for a period of 10 days; the total stretch of follicles was measured soon after the harvest and 10 days later. The Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance on ranks test was used to perform statistical analysis. RESULTS: The growth rate of follicles from Group A (mean 10-day shaft growth rate = 0.30 mm) proved to be statistically different compared with that of Group B (mean 10-day shaft growth rate = 0.23 mm). Conversely, our data did not show any significant difference between the survival rate of hair grafts from these 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our data highlighted a reduced FU shaft growth compared with that of hair micrografts, corroborating, to a certain extent, the hypothesis that a significant amount of adipose tissue surrounding the follicle included in the graft may result in an inadequate nourishment supply to follicular cells.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4634176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46341762015-11-17 Scalp Surgery: Quantitative Analysis of Follicular Unit Growth Raposio, Edoardo Caruana, Giorgia Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Experimental Over the years, different kinds of hair transplantation have been compared in an attempt to overcome male pattern alopecia and, at the same time, maximize both the survival and growth rate of grafted hair. In this study, we have assessed the survival and growth rate of follicular units (FU) in an in vitro model, as compared with that of conventional hair micrografts, to experimentally evaluate and elaborate on the differences between these 2 approaches in hair transplantation procedures. METHODS: Group A (control; n = 100 follicles) was composed of hair micrografts, whereas FUs were assigned to Group B (experimental; n = 100 follicles, n = 35 FUs). Each group was cultured for a period of 10 days; the total stretch of follicles was measured soon after the harvest and 10 days later. The Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance on ranks test was used to perform statistical analysis. RESULTS: The growth rate of follicles from Group A (mean 10-day shaft growth rate = 0.30 mm) proved to be statistically different compared with that of Group B (mean 10-day shaft growth rate = 0.23 mm). Conversely, our data did not show any significant difference between the survival rate of hair grafts from these 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our data highlighted a reduced FU shaft growth compared with that of hair micrografts, corroborating, to a certain extent, the hypothesis that a significant amount of adipose tissue surrounding the follicle included in the graft may result in an inadequate nourishment supply to follicular cells. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4634176/ /pubmed/26579345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000524 Text en Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Experimental
Raposio, Edoardo
Caruana, Giorgia
Scalp Surgery: Quantitative Analysis of Follicular Unit Growth
title Scalp Surgery: Quantitative Analysis of Follicular Unit Growth
title_full Scalp Surgery: Quantitative Analysis of Follicular Unit Growth
title_fullStr Scalp Surgery: Quantitative Analysis of Follicular Unit Growth
title_full_unstemmed Scalp Surgery: Quantitative Analysis of Follicular Unit Growth
title_short Scalp Surgery: Quantitative Analysis of Follicular Unit Growth
title_sort scalp surgery: quantitative analysis of follicular unit growth
topic Experimental
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4634176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000524
work_keys_str_mv AT raposioedoardo scalpsurgeryquantitativeanalysisoffollicularunitgrowth
AT caruanagiorgia scalpsurgeryquantitativeanalysisoffollicularunitgrowth