Cargando…

Delayed Mammoplasty with Silicone Gel Implants following DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is a state-of-the-art option for breast reconstruction. However, thin patients with medium- to large-size native breasts are not ideal candidates due to the limited amount of available tissue. We reviewed our experience utilizing the DIEP fl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walters, Jules A., Sato, Erika A., Martinez, Carlos A., Hall, Jason J., Boutros, Sean G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4634177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000527
_version_ 1782399307415027712
author Walters, Jules A.
Sato, Erika A.
Martinez, Carlos A.
Hall, Jason J.
Boutros, Sean G.
author_facet Walters, Jules A.
Sato, Erika A.
Martinez, Carlos A.
Hall, Jason J.
Boutros, Sean G.
author_sort Walters, Jules A.
collection PubMed
description The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is a state-of-the-art option for breast reconstruction. However, thin patients with medium- to large-size native breasts are not ideal candidates due to the limited amount of available tissue. We reviewed our experience utilizing the DIEP flap in combination with prosthetic implants. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 7 patients, totaling 11 implants, who underwent breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap and subsequent mammoplasty. All cases underwent previous mastectomies. No implant placement was offered at the time of their DIEP flap reconstruction. Immediate breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap was performed in 9 cases, whereas 2 required delayed reconstruction secondary to postmastectomy radiotherapy. No patients received postreconstruction radiotherapy. Breast asymmetry and inadequate volume were the primary indications for mammoplasty. For all cases, we used smooth, round silicone gel implants, which were placed in the subpectoral region. RESULTS: Mean age was 43 years. One patient was actively smoking. Four patients underwent bilateral implant placement. The mean time of delay between breast reconstruction and mammoplasty was 61 weeks. Average volume of silicone implants was 229 mL. A medial pedicle vertical mastopexy was performed in 1 patient on a nonreconstructed breast to achieve symmetry. Five patients underwent nipple reconstruction. All patients underwent delayed mammoplasty without intraoperative complications and good aesthetic results. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed mammoplasty following DIEP flap breast reconstruction is a safe and feasible procedure for patients who seek an aesthetic and natural-looking breast but lack adequate abdominal tissue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4634177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46341772015-11-17 Delayed Mammoplasty with Silicone Gel Implants following DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction Walters, Jules A. Sato, Erika A. Martinez, Carlos A. Hall, Jason J. Boutros, Sean G. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is a state-of-the-art option for breast reconstruction. However, thin patients with medium- to large-size native breasts are not ideal candidates due to the limited amount of available tissue. We reviewed our experience utilizing the DIEP flap in combination with prosthetic implants. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 7 patients, totaling 11 implants, who underwent breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap and subsequent mammoplasty. All cases underwent previous mastectomies. No implant placement was offered at the time of their DIEP flap reconstruction. Immediate breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap was performed in 9 cases, whereas 2 required delayed reconstruction secondary to postmastectomy radiotherapy. No patients received postreconstruction radiotherapy. Breast asymmetry and inadequate volume were the primary indications for mammoplasty. For all cases, we used smooth, round silicone gel implants, which were placed in the subpectoral region. RESULTS: Mean age was 43 years. One patient was actively smoking. Four patients underwent bilateral implant placement. The mean time of delay between breast reconstruction and mammoplasty was 61 weeks. Average volume of silicone implants was 229 mL. A medial pedicle vertical mastopexy was performed in 1 patient on a nonreconstructed breast to achieve symmetry. Five patients underwent nipple reconstruction. All patients underwent delayed mammoplasty without intraoperative complications and good aesthetic results. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed mammoplasty following DIEP flap breast reconstruction is a safe and feasible procedure for patients who seek an aesthetic and natural-looking breast but lack adequate abdominal tissue. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4634177/ /pubmed/26579346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000527 Text en Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Original Article
Walters, Jules A.
Sato, Erika A.
Martinez, Carlos A.
Hall, Jason J.
Boutros, Sean G.
Delayed Mammoplasty with Silicone Gel Implants following DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction
title Delayed Mammoplasty with Silicone Gel Implants following DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction
title_full Delayed Mammoplasty with Silicone Gel Implants following DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction
title_fullStr Delayed Mammoplasty with Silicone Gel Implants following DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Delayed Mammoplasty with Silicone Gel Implants following DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction
title_short Delayed Mammoplasty with Silicone Gel Implants following DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction
title_sort delayed mammoplasty with silicone gel implants following diep flap breast reconstruction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4634177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000527
work_keys_str_mv AT waltersjulesa delayedmammoplastywithsiliconegelimplantsfollowingdiepflapbreastreconstruction
AT satoerikaa delayedmammoplastywithsiliconegelimplantsfollowingdiepflapbreastreconstruction
AT martinezcarlosa delayedmammoplastywithsiliconegelimplantsfollowingdiepflapbreastreconstruction
AT halljasonj delayedmammoplastywithsiliconegelimplantsfollowingdiepflapbreastreconstruction
AT boutrosseang delayedmammoplastywithsiliconegelimplantsfollowingdiepflapbreastreconstruction