Cargando…

Factors influencing the assessment of lung function in mice with influenza‐induced lung disease

Please cite this paper as: Larcombe et al. (2012) Factors influencing the assessment of lung function in mice with influenza‐induced lung disease. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses DOI: 10.1111/irv.12034. Background  The constant‐phase model (CPM) is commonly fit to respiratory system input im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Larcombe, Alexander N., Zosky, Graeme R., Thamrin, Cindy, Bozanich, Elizabeth M., Hantos, Zoltán, Sly, Peter D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4634292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23134074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12034
_version_ 1782399330240430080
author Larcombe, Alexander N.
Zosky, Graeme R.
Thamrin, Cindy
Bozanich, Elizabeth M.
Hantos, Zoltán
Sly, Peter D.
author_facet Larcombe, Alexander N.
Zosky, Graeme R.
Thamrin, Cindy
Bozanich, Elizabeth M.
Hantos, Zoltán
Sly, Peter D.
author_sort Larcombe, Alexander N.
collection PubMed
description Please cite this paper as: Larcombe et al. (2012) Factors influencing the assessment of lung function in mice with influenza‐induced lung disease. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses DOI: 10.1111/irv.12034. Background  The constant‐phase model (CPM) is commonly fit to respiratory system input impedance (Z (rs)) to estimate lung mechanics. Driving signal frequencies and the method of model fitting may influence the results, especially in cases of severe lung disease or under severe bronchoconstriction. Objective  To illustrate the effects of different CPM fits to Z (rs) data using a mouse model of influenza‐induced lung disease. Methods  BALB/c mice infected with influenza (or control) were challenged with methacholine. The CPM was fitted to Z (rs), measured between 0·25 and 19·625 Hz, using both unweighted and weighted fits. The effect of different lowest frequencies was assessed. Results and Conclusions  For influenza‐infected mice, the unweighted fit was poor, and airway resistance (R (aw)) was often biologically impossible. The weighted fit provided more realistic estimates of R (aw). Different model fits and minimal frequencies had little effect on tissue mechanics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4634292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46342922015-12-01 Factors influencing the assessment of lung function in mice with influenza‐induced lung disease Larcombe, Alexander N. Zosky, Graeme R. Thamrin, Cindy Bozanich, Elizabeth M. Hantos, Zoltán Sly, Peter D. Influenza Other Respir Viruses Part 1 Please cite this paper as: Larcombe et al. (2012) Factors influencing the assessment of lung function in mice with influenza‐induced lung disease. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses DOI: 10.1111/irv.12034. Background  The constant‐phase model (CPM) is commonly fit to respiratory system input impedance (Z (rs)) to estimate lung mechanics. Driving signal frequencies and the method of model fitting may influence the results, especially in cases of severe lung disease or under severe bronchoconstriction. Objective  To illustrate the effects of different CPM fits to Z (rs) data using a mouse model of influenza‐induced lung disease. Methods  BALB/c mice infected with influenza (or control) were challenged with methacholine. The CPM was fitted to Z (rs), measured between 0·25 and 19·625 Hz, using both unweighted and weighted fits. The effect of different lowest frequencies was assessed. Results and Conclusions  For influenza‐infected mice, the unweighted fit was poor, and airway resistance (R (aw)) was often biologically impossible. The weighted fit provided more realistic estimates of R (aw). Different model fits and minimal frequencies had little effect on tissue mechanics. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012-11-08 2013-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4634292/ /pubmed/23134074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12034 Text en © 2012 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
spellingShingle Part 1
Larcombe, Alexander N.
Zosky, Graeme R.
Thamrin, Cindy
Bozanich, Elizabeth M.
Hantos, Zoltán
Sly, Peter D.
Factors influencing the assessment of lung function in mice with influenza‐induced lung disease
title Factors influencing the assessment of lung function in mice with influenza‐induced lung disease
title_full Factors influencing the assessment of lung function in mice with influenza‐induced lung disease
title_fullStr Factors influencing the assessment of lung function in mice with influenza‐induced lung disease
title_full_unstemmed Factors influencing the assessment of lung function in mice with influenza‐induced lung disease
title_short Factors influencing the assessment of lung function in mice with influenza‐induced lung disease
title_sort factors influencing the assessment of lung function in mice with influenza‐induced lung disease
topic Part 1
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4634292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23134074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12034
work_keys_str_mv AT larcombealexandern factorsinfluencingtheassessmentoflungfunctioninmicewithinfluenzainducedlungdisease
AT zoskygraemer factorsinfluencingtheassessmentoflungfunctioninmicewithinfluenzainducedlungdisease
AT thamrincindy factorsinfluencingtheassessmentoflungfunctioninmicewithinfluenzainducedlungdisease
AT bozanichelizabethm factorsinfluencingtheassessmentoflungfunctioninmicewithinfluenzainducedlungdisease
AT hantoszoltan factorsinfluencingtheassessmentoflungfunctioninmicewithinfluenzainducedlungdisease
AT slypeterd factorsinfluencingtheassessmentoflungfunctioninmicewithinfluenzainducedlungdisease