Cargando…
Clinical efficacy of early loading versus conventional loading of dental implants
The aim of this study was to determine the clinical differences between early and conventional loading protocols for dental implants. A comprehensive search of the Medline, Embase, and OVID databases for studies published through January 10, 2015 was conducted. Fourteen studies were included in our...
Autores principales: | Zhu, Yanfei, Zheng, Xinyi, Zeng, Guanqi, Xu, Yi, Qu, Xinhua, Zhu, Min, Lu, Eryi |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4635353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26542097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep15995 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Smoking, Radiotherapy, Diabetes and Osteoporosis as Risk Factors for Dental Implant Failure: A Meta-Analysis
por: Chen, Hui, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Mechanobiologically optimized Ti–35Nb–2Ta–3Zr improves load transduction and enhances bone remodeling in tilted dental implant therapy
por: Mao, Chuanyuan, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Bone-Implant Contact around Crestal and Subcrestal Dental Implants Submitted to Immediate and Conventional Loading
por: Pontes, Ana Emília Farias, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Implant Survival between Endo-osseous Dental Implants in Immediate Loading, Delayed Loading, and Basal Immediate Loading Dental Implants a 3-Year Follow-up
por: Garg, Ritesh, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Alloying design of biodegradable zinc as promising bone implants for load-bearing applications
por: Yang, Hongtao, et al.
Publicado: (2020)