Cargando…

The role of residence time in diagnostic models of global carbon storage capacity: model decomposition based on a traceable scheme

As a key factor that determines carbon storage capacity, residence time (τ(E)) is not well constrained in terrestrial biosphere models. This factor is recognized as an important source of model uncertainty. In this study, to understand how τ(E) influences terrestrial carbon storage prediction in dia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yizhao, Chen, Jianyang, Xia, Zhengguo, Sun, Jianlong, Li, Yiqi, Luo, Chengcheng, Gang, Zhaoqi, Wang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4635433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26541245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16155
Descripción
Sumario:As a key factor that determines carbon storage capacity, residence time (τ(E)) is not well constrained in terrestrial biosphere models. This factor is recognized as an important source of model uncertainty. In this study, to understand how τ(E) influences terrestrial carbon storage prediction in diagnostic models, we introduced a model decomposition scheme in the Boreal Ecosystem Productivity Simulator (BEPS) and then compared it with a prognostic model. The result showed that τ(E) ranged from 32.7 to 158.2 years. The baseline residence time (τ′(E)) was stable for each biome, ranging from 12 to 53.7 years for forest biomes and 4.2 to 5.3 years for non-forest biomes. The spatiotemporal variations in τ(E) were mainly determined by the environmental scalar (ξ). By comparing models, we found that the BEPS uses a more detailed pool construction but rougher parameterization for carbon allocation and decomposition. With respect to ξ comparison, the global difference in the temperature scalar (ξ(t)) averaged 0.045, whereas the moisture scalar (ξ(w)) had a much larger variation, with an average of 0.312. We propose that further evaluations and improvements in τ′(E) and ξ(w) predictions are essential to reduce the uncertainties in predicting carbon storage by the BEPS and similar diagnostic models.