Cargando…

The role of residence time in diagnostic models of global carbon storage capacity: model decomposition based on a traceable scheme

As a key factor that determines carbon storage capacity, residence time (τ(E)) is not well constrained in terrestrial biosphere models. This factor is recognized as an important source of model uncertainty. In this study, to understand how τ(E) influences terrestrial carbon storage prediction in dia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yizhao, Chen, Jianyang, Xia, Zhengguo, Sun, Jianlong, Li, Yiqi, Luo, Chengcheng, Gang, Zhaoqi, Wang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4635433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26541245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16155
_version_ 1782399505475305472
author Yizhao, Chen
Jianyang, Xia
Zhengguo, Sun
Jianlong, Li
Yiqi, Luo
Chengcheng, Gang
Zhaoqi, Wang
author_facet Yizhao, Chen
Jianyang, Xia
Zhengguo, Sun
Jianlong, Li
Yiqi, Luo
Chengcheng, Gang
Zhaoqi, Wang
author_sort Yizhao, Chen
collection PubMed
description As a key factor that determines carbon storage capacity, residence time (τ(E)) is not well constrained in terrestrial biosphere models. This factor is recognized as an important source of model uncertainty. In this study, to understand how τ(E) influences terrestrial carbon storage prediction in diagnostic models, we introduced a model decomposition scheme in the Boreal Ecosystem Productivity Simulator (BEPS) and then compared it with a prognostic model. The result showed that τ(E) ranged from 32.7 to 158.2 years. The baseline residence time (τ′(E)) was stable for each biome, ranging from 12 to 53.7 years for forest biomes and 4.2 to 5.3 years for non-forest biomes. The spatiotemporal variations in τ(E) were mainly determined by the environmental scalar (ξ). By comparing models, we found that the BEPS uses a more detailed pool construction but rougher parameterization for carbon allocation and decomposition. With respect to ξ comparison, the global difference in the temperature scalar (ξ(t)) averaged 0.045, whereas the moisture scalar (ξ(w)) had a much larger variation, with an average of 0.312. We propose that further evaluations and improvements in τ′(E) and ξ(w) predictions are essential to reduce the uncertainties in predicting carbon storage by the BEPS and similar diagnostic models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4635433
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46354332015-11-25 The role of residence time in diagnostic models of global carbon storage capacity: model decomposition based on a traceable scheme Yizhao, Chen Jianyang, Xia Zhengguo, Sun Jianlong, Li Yiqi, Luo Chengcheng, Gang Zhaoqi, Wang Sci Rep Article As a key factor that determines carbon storage capacity, residence time (τ(E)) is not well constrained in terrestrial biosphere models. This factor is recognized as an important source of model uncertainty. In this study, to understand how τ(E) influences terrestrial carbon storage prediction in diagnostic models, we introduced a model decomposition scheme in the Boreal Ecosystem Productivity Simulator (BEPS) and then compared it with a prognostic model. The result showed that τ(E) ranged from 32.7 to 158.2 years. The baseline residence time (τ′(E)) was stable for each biome, ranging from 12 to 53.7 years for forest biomes and 4.2 to 5.3 years for non-forest biomes. The spatiotemporal variations in τ(E) were mainly determined by the environmental scalar (ξ). By comparing models, we found that the BEPS uses a more detailed pool construction but rougher parameterization for carbon allocation and decomposition. With respect to ξ comparison, the global difference in the temperature scalar (ξ(t)) averaged 0.045, whereas the moisture scalar (ξ(w)) had a much larger variation, with an average of 0.312. We propose that further evaluations and improvements in τ′(E) and ξ(w) predictions are essential to reduce the uncertainties in predicting carbon storage by the BEPS and similar diagnostic models. Nature Publishing Group 2015-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4635433/ /pubmed/26541245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16155 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Yizhao, Chen
Jianyang, Xia
Zhengguo, Sun
Jianlong, Li
Yiqi, Luo
Chengcheng, Gang
Zhaoqi, Wang
The role of residence time in diagnostic models of global carbon storage capacity: model decomposition based on a traceable scheme
title The role of residence time in diagnostic models of global carbon storage capacity: model decomposition based on a traceable scheme
title_full The role of residence time in diagnostic models of global carbon storage capacity: model decomposition based on a traceable scheme
title_fullStr The role of residence time in diagnostic models of global carbon storage capacity: model decomposition based on a traceable scheme
title_full_unstemmed The role of residence time in diagnostic models of global carbon storage capacity: model decomposition based on a traceable scheme
title_short The role of residence time in diagnostic models of global carbon storage capacity: model decomposition based on a traceable scheme
title_sort role of residence time in diagnostic models of global carbon storage capacity: model decomposition based on a traceable scheme
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4635433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26541245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16155
work_keys_str_mv AT yizhaochen theroleofresidencetimeindiagnosticmodelsofglobalcarbonstoragecapacitymodeldecompositionbasedonatraceablescheme
AT jianyangxia theroleofresidencetimeindiagnosticmodelsofglobalcarbonstoragecapacitymodeldecompositionbasedonatraceablescheme
AT zhengguosun theroleofresidencetimeindiagnosticmodelsofglobalcarbonstoragecapacitymodeldecompositionbasedonatraceablescheme
AT jianlongli theroleofresidencetimeindiagnosticmodelsofglobalcarbonstoragecapacitymodeldecompositionbasedonatraceablescheme
AT yiqiluo theroleofresidencetimeindiagnosticmodelsofglobalcarbonstoragecapacitymodeldecompositionbasedonatraceablescheme
AT chengchenggang theroleofresidencetimeindiagnosticmodelsofglobalcarbonstoragecapacitymodeldecompositionbasedonatraceablescheme
AT zhaoqiwang theroleofresidencetimeindiagnosticmodelsofglobalcarbonstoragecapacitymodeldecompositionbasedonatraceablescheme
AT yizhaochen roleofresidencetimeindiagnosticmodelsofglobalcarbonstoragecapacitymodeldecompositionbasedonatraceablescheme
AT jianyangxia roleofresidencetimeindiagnosticmodelsofglobalcarbonstoragecapacitymodeldecompositionbasedonatraceablescheme
AT zhengguosun roleofresidencetimeindiagnosticmodelsofglobalcarbonstoragecapacitymodeldecompositionbasedonatraceablescheme
AT jianlongli roleofresidencetimeindiagnosticmodelsofglobalcarbonstoragecapacitymodeldecompositionbasedonatraceablescheme
AT yiqiluo roleofresidencetimeindiagnosticmodelsofglobalcarbonstoragecapacitymodeldecompositionbasedonatraceablescheme
AT chengchenggang roleofresidencetimeindiagnosticmodelsofglobalcarbonstoragecapacitymodeldecompositionbasedonatraceablescheme
AT zhaoqiwang roleofresidencetimeindiagnosticmodelsofglobalcarbonstoragecapacitymodeldecompositionbasedonatraceablescheme