Cargando…

Actions following adverse drug events – how do these influence uptake and utilisation of newer and/or similar medications?

BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, actions following some adverse drug events received major publicity. This study investigated changes in usage patterns of medications in Australia following two examples - rofecoxib market withdrawal (2004) and warnings about jaw necrosis following bisphosphonates (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barozzi, Nadia, Peeters, GMEE Geeske, Tett, Susan E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4635584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26545734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1165-9
_version_ 1782399525927780352
author Barozzi, Nadia
Peeters, GMEE Geeske
Tett, Susan E.
author_facet Barozzi, Nadia
Peeters, GMEE Geeske
Tett, Susan E.
author_sort Barozzi, Nadia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, actions following some adverse drug events received major publicity. This study investigated changes in usage patterns of medications in Australia following two examples - rofecoxib market withdrawal (2004) and warnings about jaw necrosis following bisphosphonates (2007). METHODS: Dispensing data for COX-2 inhibitors (2000–2008) and anti-osteoporosis medications (2003–2012) were obtained from the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme database. For bisphosphonates, data on Australian marketing expenditures were purchased from Cegedim(R). RESULTS: For COX-2 inhibitors, celecoxib dispensing halved after rofecoxib withdrawal, but meloxicam dispensing increased by 60 %. When lumiracoxib was introduced (2006) there was uptake of prescribing at a faster rate than meloxicam in 2002, its first year of use. For bisphosphonates, alendronate had highest use at the time of the warnings (8.3 DDD/1000/day), dropping to 4.9 DDD/1000/day by 2012. In contrast, risedronate use rose 2007–2012 from 4.1 to 4.9 DDD/1000/day. There was 49 % increase in reported annual expenditure on detailing for risedronate from 2007 to 2008 (to AUD$7.3 million) and only 29 % increase for alendronate (to AUD$3.1 million). CONCLUSIONS: The rapid uptake of prescribing of lumiracoxib and increased use of meloxicam flagged a concern, especially after rofecoxib withdrawal due to safety issues. Bisphosphonates are useful drugs, however the dramatic rise in expenditure on detailing, followed by a rise in utilisation of risedronate could suggest that adverse publicity triggered a marketing response. These examples highlight the importance of tracking utilisation of medication classes in real time, using different data as needed, to ensure that due caution is exercised (and quick intervention provided if needed) for medications in the same class. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1165-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4635584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46355842015-11-07 Actions following adverse drug events – how do these influence uptake and utilisation of newer and/or similar medications? Barozzi, Nadia Peeters, GMEE Geeske Tett, Susan E. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, actions following some adverse drug events received major publicity. This study investigated changes in usage patterns of medications in Australia following two examples - rofecoxib market withdrawal (2004) and warnings about jaw necrosis following bisphosphonates (2007). METHODS: Dispensing data for COX-2 inhibitors (2000–2008) and anti-osteoporosis medications (2003–2012) were obtained from the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme database. For bisphosphonates, data on Australian marketing expenditures were purchased from Cegedim(R). RESULTS: For COX-2 inhibitors, celecoxib dispensing halved after rofecoxib withdrawal, but meloxicam dispensing increased by 60 %. When lumiracoxib was introduced (2006) there was uptake of prescribing at a faster rate than meloxicam in 2002, its first year of use. For bisphosphonates, alendronate had highest use at the time of the warnings (8.3 DDD/1000/day), dropping to 4.9 DDD/1000/day by 2012. In contrast, risedronate use rose 2007–2012 from 4.1 to 4.9 DDD/1000/day. There was 49 % increase in reported annual expenditure on detailing for risedronate from 2007 to 2008 (to AUD$7.3 million) and only 29 % increase for alendronate (to AUD$3.1 million). CONCLUSIONS: The rapid uptake of prescribing of lumiracoxib and increased use of meloxicam flagged a concern, especially after rofecoxib withdrawal due to safety issues. Bisphosphonates are useful drugs, however the dramatic rise in expenditure on detailing, followed by a rise in utilisation of risedronate could suggest that adverse publicity triggered a marketing response. These examples highlight the importance of tracking utilisation of medication classes in real time, using different data as needed, to ensure that due caution is exercised (and quick intervention provided if needed) for medications in the same class. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1165-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4635584/ /pubmed/26545734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1165-9 Text en © Barozzi et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Barozzi, Nadia
Peeters, GMEE Geeske
Tett, Susan E.
Actions following adverse drug events – how do these influence uptake and utilisation of newer and/or similar medications?
title Actions following adverse drug events – how do these influence uptake and utilisation of newer and/or similar medications?
title_full Actions following adverse drug events – how do these influence uptake and utilisation of newer and/or similar medications?
title_fullStr Actions following adverse drug events – how do these influence uptake and utilisation of newer and/or similar medications?
title_full_unstemmed Actions following adverse drug events – how do these influence uptake and utilisation of newer and/or similar medications?
title_short Actions following adverse drug events – how do these influence uptake and utilisation of newer and/or similar medications?
title_sort actions following adverse drug events – how do these influence uptake and utilisation of newer and/or similar medications?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4635584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26545734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1165-9
work_keys_str_mv AT barozzinadia actionsfollowingadversedrugeventshowdotheseinfluenceuptakeandutilisationofnewerandorsimilarmedications
AT peetersgmeegeeske actionsfollowingadversedrugeventshowdotheseinfluenceuptakeandutilisationofnewerandorsimilarmedications
AT tettsusane actionsfollowingadversedrugeventshowdotheseinfluenceuptakeandutilisationofnewerandorsimilarmedications