Cargando…
Comparison of thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis with McKeown esophagectomy for middle esophageal cancer
BACKGROUND: In China, the middle esophageal squamous cell cancer is the most common tumor type, and Mckeown esophagectomy (ME) is preferably adopted by thoracic surgeon. But, the surgical trauma of ME is great. Thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy (TE) was developed to decrease the operative stress; ho...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4635614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26542373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0727-y |
_version_ | 1782399533029785600 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Hai-Tao Wang, Fei Shen, Liang Xia, Chun-Qiu Lu, Chen-Xi Zhong, Chong-Jun |
author_facet | Huang, Hai-Tao Wang, Fei Shen, Liang Xia, Chun-Qiu Lu, Chen-Xi Zhong, Chong-Jun |
author_sort | Huang, Hai-Tao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In China, the middle esophageal squamous cell cancer is the most common tumor type, and Mckeown esophagectomy (ME) is preferably adopted by thoracic surgeon. But, the surgical trauma of ME is great. Thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy (TE) was developed to decrease the operative stress; however, the safety and efficacy were not defined. In this study, clinical outcomes were compared between patients who received ME and TE. METHODS: The data of 113 patients who suffered from middle-thoracic esophageal cancer during the same period were collected. Sixty-two patients received ME (ME group), and 51 patients received TE (TE group). Patients’ demographics and short-term clinicopathologic outcomes were comparable between the two groups. Survival rate was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and comparisons between groups were performed with log–rank test. RESULTS: Patients in TE group had lower body mass index (BMI). Preoperative tumor stage in TE group was much earlier. Both overall and thoracic operation time were longer in TE group. The blood loss during operation and postoperative day (POD) 1 was less in TE group, which contributed to the less blood transfusion. In TE group, postoperative incidence of pulmonary complications and atrial fibrillation (p = 0.035 and p = 0.033) was lower; the inflammatory response and incision pain were significantly alleviated; the ICU and in-hospital stay was shorter as well because of less surgical trauma. No statistically significant difference was found between two groups in terms of overall survival or disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety of TE were supported by the selected patients in this cohort study. Although it is lack of randomness in this research, some advantages of TE were gratifying such as lower postoperative complications and similar survival with ME. A multicenter prospective randomized study is now required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4635614 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46356142015-11-07 Comparison of thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis with McKeown esophagectomy for middle esophageal cancer Huang, Hai-Tao Wang, Fei Shen, Liang Xia, Chun-Qiu Lu, Chen-Xi Zhong, Chong-Jun World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: In China, the middle esophageal squamous cell cancer is the most common tumor type, and Mckeown esophagectomy (ME) is preferably adopted by thoracic surgeon. But, the surgical trauma of ME is great. Thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy (TE) was developed to decrease the operative stress; however, the safety and efficacy were not defined. In this study, clinical outcomes were compared between patients who received ME and TE. METHODS: The data of 113 patients who suffered from middle-thoracic esophageal cancer during the same period were collected. Sixty-two patients received ME (ME group), and 51 patients received TE (TE group). Patients’ demographics and short-term clinicopathologic outcomes were comparable between the two groups. Survival rate was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and comparisons between groups were performed with log–rank test. RESULTS: Patients in TE group had lower body mass index (BMI). Preoperative tumor stage in TE group was much earlier. Both overall and thoracic operation time were longer in TE group. The blood loss during operation and postoperative day (POD) 1 was less in TE group, which contributed to the less blood transfusion. In TE group, postoperative incidence of pulmonary complications and atrial fibrillation (p = 0.035 and p = 0.033) was lower; the inflammatory response and incision pain were significantly alleviated; the ICU and in-hospital stay was shorter as well because of less surgical trauma. No statistically significant difference was found between two groups in terms of overall survival or disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety of TE were supported by the selected patients in this cohort study. Although it is lack of randomness in this research, some advantages of TE were gratifying such as lower postoperative complications and similar survival with ME. A multicenter prospective randomized study is now required. BioMed Central 2015-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4635614/ /pubmed/26542373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0727-y Text en © Huang et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Huang, Hai-Tao Wang, Fei Shen, Liang Xia, Chun-Qiu Lu, Chen-Xi Zhong, Chong-Jun Comparison of thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis with McKeown esophagectomy for middle esophageal cancer |
title | Comparison of thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis with McKeown esophagectomy for middle esophageal cancer |
title_full | Comparison of thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis with McKeown esophagectomy for middle esophageal cancer |
title_fullStr | Comparison of thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis with McKeown esophagectomy for middle esophageal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis with McKeown esophagectomy for middle esophageal cancer |
title_short | Comparison of thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis with McKeown esophagectomy for middle esophageal cancer |
title_sort | comparison of thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis with mckeown esophagectomy for middle esophageal cancer |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4635614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26542373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0727-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huanghaitao comparisonofthoracolaparoscopicesophagectomywithcervicalanastomosiswithmckeownesophagectomyformiddleesophagealcancer AT wangfei comparisonofthoracolaparoscopicesophagectomywithcervicalanastomosiswithmckeownesophagectomyformiddleesophagealcancer AT shenliang comparisonofthoracolaparoscopicesophagectomywithcervicalanastomosiswithmckeownesophagectomyformiddleesophagealcancer AT xiachunqiu comparisonofthoracolaparoscopicesophagectomywithcervicalanastomosiswithmckeownesophagectomyformiddleesophagealcancer AT luchenxi comparisonofthoracolaparoscopicesophagectomywithcervicalanastomosiswithmckeownesophagectomyformiddleesophagealcancer AT zhongchongjun comparisonofthoracolaparoscopicesophagectomywithcervicalanastomosiswithmckeownesophagectomyformiddleesophagealcancer |