Cargando…
Scapular Notching on Kinematic Simulated Range of Motion After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Is Not the Result of Impingement in Adduction
Impingement after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is believed to occur from repetitive contact in adduction between the humeral component and the inferior scapular pillar. The primary purpose of this biomechanical study was to confirm the presence of different types of impingement and to examine...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4635769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26402829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001615 |
_version_ | 1782399551970213888 |
---|---|
author | Lädermann, Alexandre Gueorguiev, Boyko Charbonnier, Caecilia Stimec, Bojan V. Fasel, Jean H.D. Zderic, Ivan Hagen, Jennifer Walch, Gilles |
author_facet | Lädermann, Alexandre Gueorguiev, Boyko Charbonnier, Caecilia Stimec, Bojan V. Fasel, Jean H.D. Zderic, Ivan Hagen, Jennifer Walch, Gilles |
author_sort | Lädermann, Alexandre |
collection | PubMed |
description | Impingement after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is believed to occur from repetitive contact in adduction between the humeral component and the inferior scapular pillar. The primary purpose of this biomechanical study was to confirm the presence of different types of impingement and to examine which daily-life movements are responsible for them. A secondary aim was to provide recommendations on the type of components that would best minimize notching and loss of range of motion (ROM). The study included 12 fresh frozen shoulder specimens; each had a computed tomography (CT) image of the entire scapula and humerus in order to acquire topological information of the bones before RSA implantation. Cyclic tests were run postimplantation with 3 shoulders in each modalities. To quantify bone loss due to impingement, 3-dimensional anatomical models of the scapula were reconstructed from the CT scans and compared to their intact states. We found 8 bony impingements in 7 specimens: 2 at the lateral acromion, 1 at the inferior acromion, 4 scapular notching, and 1 with the glenoid resulting to wear at the 3:00 to 6:00 clock-face position. Impingements occurred in all kinds of tested motions, except for the internal/external rotation at 90° of abduction. The 3 specimens tested in abduction/adduction presented bone loss on the acromion side only. Scapular notching was noted in flexion/extension and in internal/external rotation at 0° of abduction. The humeral polyethylene liner was worn in 2 specimens—1 at the 6:00 to 8:00 clock-face position during internal/external rotation at 0° of abduction and 1 at the 4:00 clock-face position during flexion/extension. The present study revealed that 2 types of impingement interactions coexist and correspond to a frank abutment or lead to a scapular notching (friction-type impingement). Scapular notching seems to be caused by more movements or combination of movements than previously considered, and in particular by movements of flexion/extension and internal/external rotation with the arm at the side. Polyethylene cups with a notch between 3 and 9 o’clock and lower neck-shaft angle (145° or 135°) may play an important role in postoperative ROM limiting scapular notching. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4635769 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46357692015-11-30 Scapular Notching on Kinematic Simulated Range of Motion After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Is Not the Result of Impingement in Adduction Lädermann, Alexandre Gueorguiev, Boyko Charbonnier, Caecilia Stimec, Bojan V. Fasel, Jean H.D. Zderic, Ivan Hagen, Jennifer Walch, Gilles Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 Impingement after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is believed to occur from repetitive contact in adduction between the humeral component and the inferior scapular pillar. The primary purpose of this biomechanical study was to confirm the presence of different types of impingement and to examine which daily-life movements are responsible for them. A secondary aim was to provide recommendations on the type of components that would best minimize notching and loss of range of motion (ROM). The study included 12 fresh frozen shoulder specimens; each had a computed tomography (CT) image of the entire scapula and humerus in order to acquire topological information of the bones before RSA implantation. Cyclic tests were run postimplantation with 3 shoulders in each modalities. To quantify bone loss due to impingement, 3-dimensional anatomical models of the scapula were reconstructed from the CT scans and compared to their intact states. We found 8 bony impingements in 7 specimens: 2 at the lateral acromion, 1 at the inferior acromion, 4 scapular notching, and 1 with the glenoid resulting to wear at the 3:00 to 6:00 clock-face position. Impingements occurred in all kinds of tested motions, except for the internal/external rotation at 90° of abduction. The 3 specimens tested in abduction/adduction presented bone loss on the acromion side only. Scapular notching was noted in flexion/extension and in internal/external rotation at 0° of abduction. The humeral polyethylene liner was worn in 2 specimens—1 at the 6:00 to 8:00 clock-face position during internal/external rotation at 0° of abduction and 1 at the 4:00 clock-face position during flexion/extension. The present study revealed that 2 types of impingement interactions coexist and correspond to a frank abutment or lead to a scapular notching (friction-type impingement). Scapular notching seems to be caused by more movements or combination of movements than previously considered, and in particular by movements of flexion/extension and internal/external rotation with the arm at the side. Polyethylene cups with a notch between 3 and 9 o’clock and lower neck-shaft angle (145° or 135°) may play an important role in postoperative ROM limiting scapular notching. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4635769/ /pubmed/26402829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001615 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 7100 Lädermann, Alexandre Gueorguiev, Boyko Charbonnier, Caecilia Stimec, Bojan V. Fasel, Jean H.D. Zderic, Ivan Hagen, Jennifer Walch, Gilles Scapular Notching on Kinematic Simulated Range of Motion After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Is Not the Result of Impingement in Adduction |
title | Scapular Notching on Kinematic Simulated Range of Motion After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Is Not the Result of Impingement in Adduction |
title_full | Scapular Notching on Kinematic Simulated Range of Motion After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Is Not the Result of Impingement in Adduction |
title_fullStr | Scapular Notching on Kinematic Simulated Range of Motion After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Is Not the Result of Impingement in Adduction |
title_full_unstemmed | Scapular Notching on Kinematic Simulated Range of Motion After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Is Not the Result of Impingement in Adduction |
title_short | Scapular Notching on Kinematic Simulated Range of Motion After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Is Not the Result of Impingement in Adduction |
title_sort | scapular notching on kinematic simulated range of motion after reverse shoulder arthroplasty is not the result of impingement in adduction |
topic | 7100 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4635769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26402829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001615 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ladermannalexandre scapularnotchingonkinematicsimulatedrangeofmotionafterreverseshoulderarthroplastyisnottheresultofimpingementinadduction AT gueorguievboyko scapularnotchingonkinematicsimulatedrangeofmotionafterreverseshoulderarthroplastyisnottheresultofimpingementinadduction AT charbonniercaecilia scapularnotchingonkinematicsimulatedrangeofmotionafterreverseshoulderarthroplastyisnottheresultofimpingementinadduction AT stimecbojanv scapularnotchingonkinematicsimulatedrangeofmotionafterreverseshoulderarthroplastyisnottheresultofimpingementinadduction AT faseljeanhd scapularnotchingonkinematicsimulatedrangeofmotionafterreverseshoulderarthroplastyisnottheresultofimpingementinadduction AT zdericivan scapularnotchingonkinematicsimulatedrangeofmotionafterreverseshoulderarthroplastyisnottheresultofimpingementinadduction AT hagenjennifer scapularnotchingonkinematicsimulatedrangeofmotionafterreverseshoulderarthroplastyisnottheresultofimpingementinadduction AT walchgilles scapularnotchingonkinematicsimulatedrangeofmotionafterreverseshoulderarthroplastyisnottheresultofimpingementinadduction |