Cargando…

Different Scoring Methods of FDG PET/CT in Giant Cell Arteritis: Need for Standardization

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most frequent form of vasculitis in persons older than 50 years. Cranial and systemic large vessels can be involved. [(18)F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is increasingly used to diagnose inflammation of the lar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stellingwerff, Menno D., Brouwer, Elisabeth, Lensen, Karel-Jan D.F., Rutgers, Abraham, Arends, Suzanne, van der Geest, Kornelis S.M., Glaudemans, Andor W.J.M., Slart, Riemer H.J.A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4635818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26376404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001542
_version_ 1782399563172151296
author Stellingwerff, Menno D.
Brouwer, Elisabeth
Lensen, Karel-Jan D.F.
Rutgers, Abraham
Arends, Suzanne
van der Geest, Kornelis S.M.
Glaudemans, Andor W.J.M.
Slart, Riemer H.J.A.
author_facet Stellingwerff, Menno D.
Brouwer, Elisabeth
Lensen, Karel-Jan D.F.
Rutgers, Abraham
Arends, Suzanne
van der Geest, Kornelis S.M.
Glaudemans, Andor W.J.M.
Slart, Riemer H.J.A.
author_sort Stellingwerff, Menno D.
collection PubMed
description Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most frequent form of vasculitis in persons older than 50 years. Cranial and systemic large vessels can be involved. [(18)F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is increasingly used to diagnose inflammation of the large arteries in GCA. Unfortunately, no consensus exists on the preferred scoring method. In the present study, we aim to define the optimal FDG PET/CT scoring method for GCA diagnosis using temporal artery biopsy and clinical diagnosis as the reference method. FDG PET/CT scans of GCA patients (12 glucocorticoid-naive, 6 on glucocorticoid treatment) and 3 control groups (inflammatory, atherosclerotic, and normal controls) were evaluated. We compared 2 qualitative visual methods (i.e. (1a) first impression and (1b) vascular uptake versus liver uptake) and 4 semiquantitative methods ((2a) SUVmax aorta, (2b) SUVmax aorta-to-liver ratio, (2c) SUVmax aorta-to-superior-caval-vein ratio, and (2d) SUVmax aorta-to-inferior-caval-vein ratio). FDG uptake pattern (diffuse or focal) and presence of arterial calcifications were also scored. Diagnostic accuracy of the visual method vascular versus liver uptake (1b) was highest when the cut-off point “vascular uptake higher than liver uptake” (sensitivity 83%, specificity 91%) was used. Sensitivity increased to 92% when patients on glucocorticoids were excluded from the analysis. Regarding the semiquantitative methods, the aorta-to-liver ratio (2b) with a cutoff of 1.03 had the highest diagnostic accuracy, with a sensitivity and specificity of 69% and 92%, respectively. Sensitivity increased to 90% when patients on glucocorticoids were excluded. The number of vascular segments with diffuse FDG uptake pattern was significantly higher in GCA patients without glucocorticoid use compared with all control patient groups. CRP was not significantly different between positive and negative FDG PET scans in the GCA group. Visual vascular uptake higher than liver uptake resulted in the highest diagnostic accuracy for the detection of GCA, especially in combination with a diffuse FDG uptake pattern. Of the semiquantitative methods, the aorta-to-liver SUVmax ratio (cutoff point = 1.03) had the highest diagnostic accuracy. The diagnostic accuracy increased when patients using glucocorticoids were excluded from the analyses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4635818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46358182015-11-30 Different Scoring Methods of FDG PET/CT in Giant Cell Arteritis: Need for Standardization Stellingwerff, Menno D. Brouwer, Elisabeth Lensen, Karel-Jan D.F. Rutgers, Abraham Arends, Suzanne van der Geest, Kornelis S.M. Glaudemans, Andor W.J.M. Slart, Riemer H.J.A. Medicine (Baltimore) 3400 Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most frequent form of vasculitis in persons older than 50 years. Cranial and systemic large vessels can be involved. [(18)F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is increasingly used to diagnose inflammation of the large arteries in GCA. Unfortunately, no consensus exists on the preferred scoring method. In the present study, we aim to define the optimal FDG PET/CT scoring method for GCA diagnosis using temporal artery biopsy and clinical diagnosis as the reference method. FDG PET/CT scans of GCA patients (12 glucocorticoid-naive, 6 on glucocorticoid treatment) and 3 control groups (inflammatory, atherosclerotic, and normal controls) were evaluated. We compared 2 qualitative visual methods (i.e. (1a) first impression and (1b) vascular uptake versus liver uptake) and 4 semiquantitative methods ((2a) SUVmax aorta, (2b) SUVmax aorta-to-liver ratio, (2c) SUVmax aorta-to-superior-caval-vein ratio, and (2d) SUVmax aorta-to-inferior-caval-vein ratio). FDG uptake pattern (diffuse or focal) and presence of arterial calcifications were also scored. Diagnostic accuracy of the visual method vascular versus liver uptake (1b) was highest when the cut-off point “vascular uptake higher than liver uptake” (sensitivity 83%, specificity 91%) was used. Sensitivity increased to 92% when patients on glucocorticoids were excluded from the analysis. Regarding the semiquantitative methods, the aorta-to-liver ratio (2b) with a cutoff of 1.03 had the highest diagnostic accuracy, with a sensitivity and specificity of 69% and 92%, respectively. Sensitivity increased to 90% when patients on glucocorticoids were excluded. The number of vascular segments with diffuse FDG uptake pattern was significantly higher in GCA patients without glucocorticoid use compared with all control patient groups. CRP was not significantly different between positive and negative FDG PET scans in the GCA group. Visual vascular uptake higher than liver uptake resulted in the highest diagnostic accuracy for the detection of GCA, especially in combination with a diffuse FDG uptake pattern. Of the semiquantitative methods, the aorta-to-liver SUVmax ratio (cutoff point = 1.03) had the highest diagnostic accuracy. The diagnostic accuracy increased when patients using glucocorticoids were excluded from the analyses. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4635818/ /pubmed/26376404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001542 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives License 4.0, which allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 3400
Stellingwerff, Menno D.
Brouwer, Elisabeth
Lensen, Karel-Jan D.F.
Rutgers, Abraham
Arends, Suzanne
van der Geest, Kornelis S.M.
Glaudemans, Andor W.J.M.
Slart, Riemer H.J.A.
Different Scoring Methods of FDG PET/CT in Giant Cell Arteritis: Need for Standardization
title Different Scoring Methods of FDG PET/CT in Giant Cell Arteritis: Need for Standardization
title_full Different Scoring Methods of FDG PET/CT in Giant Cell Arteritis: Need for Standardization
title_fullStr Different Scoring Methods of FDG PET/CT in Giant Cell Arteritis: Need for Standardization
title_full_unstemmed Different Scoring Methods of FDG PET/CT in Giant Cell Arteritis: Need for Standardization
title_short Different Scoring Methods of FDG PET/CT in Giant Cell Arteritis: Need for Standardization
title_sort different scoring methods of fdg pet/ct in giant cell arteritis: need for standardization
topic 3400
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4635818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26376404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001542
work_keys_str_mv AT stellingwerffmennod differentscoringmethodsoffdgpetctingiantcellarteritisneedforstandardization
AT brouwerelisabeth differentscoringmethodsoffdgpetctingiantcellarteritisneedforstandardization
AT lensenkareljandf differentscoringmethodsoffdgpetctingiantcellarteritisneedforstandardization
AT rutgersabraham differentscoringmethodsoffdgpetctingiantcellarteritisneedforstandardization
AT arendssuzanne differentscoringmethodsoffdgpetctingiantcellarteritisneedforstandardization
AT vandergeestkornelissm differentscoringmethodsoffdgpetctingiantcellarteritisneedforstandardization
AT glaudemansandorwjm differentscoringmethodsoffdgpetctingiantcellarteritisneedforstandardization
AT slartriemerhja differentscoringmethodsoffdgpetctingiantcellarteritisneedforstandardization