Cargando…
Open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase II DeCOG-study of ipilimumab in pretreated patients with different subtypes of metastatic melanoma
BACKGROUND: Ipilimumab is an approved immunotherapy that has shown an overall survival benefit in patients with cutaneous metastatic melanoma in two phase III trials. As results of registrational trials might not answer all questions regarding safety and efficacy of ipilimumab in patients with advan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4635983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26541511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-015-0716-5 |
_version_ | 1782399584627064832 |
---|---|
author | Zimmer, Lisa Eigentler, Thomas K. Kiecker, Felix Simon, Jan Utikal, Jochen Mohr, Peter Berking, Carola Kämpgen, Eckhart Dippel, Edgar Stadler, Rudolf Hauschild, Axel Fluck, Michael Terheyden, Patrick Rompel, Rainer Loquai, Carmen Assi, Zeinab Garbe, Claus Schadendorf, Dirk |
author_facet | Zimmer, Lisa Eigentler, Thomas K. Kiecker, Felix Simon, Jan Utikal, Jochen Mohr, Peter Berking, Carola Kämpgen, Eckhart Dippel, Edgar Stadler, Rudolf Hauschild, Axel Fluck, Michael Terheyden, Patrick Rompel, Rainer Loquai, Carmen Assi, Zeinab Garbe, Claus Schadendorf, Dirk |
author_sort | Zimmer, Lisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ipilimumab is an approved immunotherapy that has shown an overall survival benefit in patients with cutaneous metastatic melanoma in two phase III trials. As results of registrational trials might not answer all questions regarding safety and efficacy of ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma seen in daily clinical practice, the Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group conducted a phase II study to assess the efficacy and safety of ipilimumab in patients with different subtypes of metastatic melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We undertook a multicenter phase II study in melanoma patients irrespective of location of the primary melanoma. Here we present data on patients with pretreated metastatic cutaneous, mucosal and occult melanoma who received up to four cycles of ipilimumab administered at a dose of 3 mg/kg in 3 week intervals. Tumor assessments were conducted at baseline, weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48 according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Adverse events (AEs), including immune-related AEs were graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) v.4.0. Primary endpoint was the OS rate at 12 months. RESULTS: 103 pretreated patients received at least one dose of ipilimumab, including 83 cutaneous, seven mucosal and 13 occult melanomas. 1-year OS rates for cutaneous, mucosal and occult melanoma were 38 %, 14 % and 27 %, respectively. Median OS was 6.8 months (95 % CI 5.3–9.9) for cutaneous, 9.6 months (95 % CI 1.6–11.1) for mucosal, and 9.9 months (lower 95 % CI 2.3, upper 95 % CI non-existent) for occult melanoma. Overall response rates for cutaneous, mucosal and occult melanoma were 16 %, 17 % and 11 %, respectively. Eleven patients had partial response (16 %) and ten patients experienced stable disease (14 %), none achieved a complete response. Treatment-related AEs were observed in 71 patients (69 %), including 20 grade 3–4 events (19 %). No new and unexpected safety findings were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Ipilimumab is a treatment option for pretreated patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma seen in daily routine. Toxicity was manageable when treated as per protocol-specific guidelines. Trial registration: Clinical Trials.gov NCT01355120 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12967-015-0716-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4635983 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46359832015-11-07 Open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase II DeCOG-study of ipilimumab in pretreated patients with different subtypes of metastatic melanoma Zimmer, Lisa Eigentler, Thomas K. Kiecker, Felix Simon, Jan Utikal, Jochen Mohr, Peter Berking, Carola Kämpgen, Eckhart Dippel, Edgar Stadler, Rudolf Hauschild, Axel Fluck, Michael Terheyden, Patrick Rompel, Rainer Loquai, Carmen Assi, Zeinab Garbe, Claus Schadendorf, Dirk J Transl Med Research BACKGROUND: Ipilimumab is an approved immunotherapy that has shown an overall survival benefit in patients with cutaneous metastatic melanoma in two phase III trials. As results of registrational trials might not answer all questions regarding safety and efficacy of ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma seen in daily clinical practice, the Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group conducted a phase II study to assess the efficacy and safety of ipilimumab in patients with different subtypes of metastatic melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We undertook a multicenter phase II study in melanoma patients irrespective of location of the primary melanoma. Here we present data on patients with pretreated metastatic cutaneous, mucosal and occult melanoma who received up to four cycles of ipilimumab administered at a dose of 3 mg/kg in 3 week intervals. Tumor assessments were conducted at baseline, weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48 according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Adverse events (AEs), including immune-related AEs were graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) v.4.0. Primary endpoint was the OS rate at 12 months. RESULTS: 103 pretreated patients received at least one dose of ipilimumab, including 83 cutaneous, seven mucosal and 13 occult melanomas. 1-year OS rates for cutaneous, mucosal and occult melanoma were 38 %, 14 % and 27 %, respectively. Median OS was 6.8 months (95 % CI 5.3–9.9) for cutaneous, 9.6 months (95 % CI 1.6–11.1) for mucosal, and 9.9 months (lower 95 % CI 2.3, upper 95 % CI non-existent) for occult melanoma. Overall response rates for cutaneous, mucosal and occult melanoma were 16 %, 17 % and 11 %, respectively. Eleven patients had partial response (16 %) and ten patients experienced stable disease (14 %), none achieved a complete response. Treatment-related AEs were observed in 71 patients (69 %), including 20 grade 3–4 events (19 %). No new and unexpected safety findings were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Ipilimumab is a treatment option for pretreated patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma seen in daily routine. Toxicity was manageable when treated as per protocol-specific guidelines. Trial registration: Clinical Trials.gov NCT01355120 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12967-015-0716-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4635983/ /pubmed/26541511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-015-0716-5 Text en © Zimmer et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Zimmer, Lisa Eigentler, Thomas K. Kiecker, Felix Simon, Jan Utikal, Jochen Mohr, Peter Berking, Carola Kämpgen, Eckhart Dippel, Edgar Stadler, Rudolf Hauschild, Axel Fluck, Michael Terheyden, Patrick Rompel, Rainer Loquai, Carmen Assi, Zeinab Garbe, Claus Schadendorf, Dirk Open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase II DeCOG-study of ipilimumab in pretreated patients with different subtypes of metastatic melanoma |
title | Open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase II DeCOG-study of ipilimumab in pretreated patients with different subtypes of metastatic melanoma |
title_full | Open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase II DeCOG-study of ipilimumab in pretreated patients with different subtypes of metastatic melanoma |
title_fullStr | Open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase II DeCOG-study of ipilimumab in pretreated patients with different subtypes of metastatic melanoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase II DeCOG-study of ipilimumab in pretreated patients with different subtypes of metastatic melanoma |
title_short | Open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase II DeCOG-study of ipilimumab in pretreated patients with different subtypes of metastatic melanoma |
title_sort | open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase ii decog-study of ipilimumab in pretreated patients with different subtypes of metastatic melanoma |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4635983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26541511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-015-0716-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zimmerlisa openlabelmulticentersinglearmphaseiidecogstudyofipilimumabinpretreatedpatientswithdifferentsubtypesofmetastaticmelanoma AT eigentlerthomask openlabelmulticentersinglearmphaseiidecogstudyofipilimumabinpretreatedpatientswithdifferentsubtypesofmetastaticmelanoma AT kieckerfelix openlabelmulticentersinglearmphaseiidecogstudyofipilimumabinpretreatedpatientswithdifferentsubtypesofmetastaticmelanoma AT simonjan openlabelmulticentersinglearmphaseiidecogstudyofipilimumabinpretreatedpatientswithdifferentsubtypesofmetastaticmelanoma AT utikaljochen openlabelmulticentersinglearmphaseiidecogstudyofipilimumabinpretreatedpatientswithdifferentsubtypesofmetastaticmelanoma AT mohrpeter openlabelmulticentersinglearmphaseiidecogstudyofipilimumabinpretreatedpatientswithdifferentsubtypesofmetastaticmelanoma AT berkingcarola openlabelmulticentersinglearmphaseiidecogstudyofipilimumabinpretreatedpatientswithdifferentsubtypesofmetastaticmelanoma AT kampgeneckhart openlabelmulticentersinglearmphaseiidecogstudyofipilimumabinpretreatedpatientswithdifferentsubtypesofmetastaticmelanoma AT dippeledgar openlabelmulticentersinglearmphaseiidecogstudyofipilimumabinpretreatedpatientswithdifferentsubtypesofmetastaticmelanoma AT stadlerrudolf openlabelmulticentersinglearmphaseiidecogstudyofipilimumabinpretreatedpatientswithdifferentsubtypesofmetastaticmelanoma AT hauschildaxel openlabelmulticentersinglearmphaseiidecogstudyofipilimumabinpretreatedpatientswithdifferentsubtypesofmetastaticmelanoma AT fluckmichael openlabelmulticentersinglearmphaseiidecogstudyofipilimumabinpretreatedpatientswithdifferentsubtypesofmetastaticmelanoma AT terheydenpatrick openlabelmulticentersinglearmphaseiidecogstudyofipilimumabinpretreatedpatientswithdifferentsubtypesofmetastaticmelanoma AT rompelrainer openlabelmulticentersinglearmphaseiidecogstudyofipilimumabinpretreatedpatientswithdifferentsubtypesofmetastaticmelanoma AT loquaicarmen openlabelmulticentersinglearmphaseiidecogstudyofipilimumabinpretreatedpatientswithdifferentsubtypesofmetastaticmelanoma AT assizeinab openlabelmulticentersinglearmphaseiidecogstudyofipilimumabinpretreatedpatientswithdifferentsubtypesofmetastaticmelanoma AT garbeclaus openlabelmulticentersinglearmphaseiidecogstudyofipilimumabinpretreatedpatientswithdifferentsubtypesofmetastaticmelanoma AT schadendorfdirk openlabelmulticentersinglearmphaseiidecogstudyofipilimumabinpretreatedpatientswithdifferentsubtypesofmetastaticmelanoma |