Cargando…

Tear film osmolarity and dry eye disease: a review of the literature

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the evidence in the peer-reviewed literature regarding the use of tear osmolarity as a physiological marker to diagnose, grade severity, and track therapeutic response in dry eye disease (DED). In addition, to review the evidence for the role of tear osmolarity in the pathophy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Potvin, Richard, Makari, Sarah, Rapuano, Christopher J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4636089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26586933
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S95242
_version_ 1782399597262405632
author Potvin, Richard
Makari, Sarah
Rapuano, Christopher J
author_facet Potvin, Richard
Makari, Sarah
Rapuano, Christopher J
author_sort Potvin, Richard
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the evidence in the peer-reviewed literature regarding the use of tear osmolarity as a physiological marker to diagnose, grade severity, and track therapeutic response in dry eye disease (DED). In addition, to review the evidence for the role of tear osmolarity in the pathophysiology of DED and ocular surface disease. METHODS: A literature review of all publications after the year 2000, which included the keywords “tear osmolarity”, was conducted. Relevant articles were graded according to quality of evidence and research, using the University of Michigan Practice Guideline and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) rating systems. Articles were further categorized by the nature of any reported financial support and by the overall impression they provided related to tear osmolarity. RESULTS: A total of 164 articles were identified as relevant to the search criteria, although some were editorials, and some were written in a foreign language. Of the total, it was possible to grade 159, and an overall impression was generated for 163. A positive impression of tear osmolarity in DED diagnosis was evident in 72% (117/163) of all articles, with a neutral impression in a further 21% (35/163); 7% had a negative impression. The percentage of positive impressions appeared independent of the quality of research; 73% (38/52) of articles graded high/moderate quality supported the use of tear film osmolarity measurement in DED diagnosis. Impressions were also independent of the source of financial support, with 72% (75/104) of independent studies positive. CONCLUSION: The literature broadly supports the use of tear film osmolarity as an objective numerical measure for diagnosing, grading severity, and managing treatment of DED.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4636089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46360892015-11-19 Tear film osmolarity and dry eye disease: a review of the literature Potvin, Richard Makari, Sarah Rapuano, Christopher J Clin Ophthalmol Review OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the evidence in the peer-reviewed literature regarding the use of tear osmolarity as a physiological marker to diagnose, grade severity, and track therapeutic response in dry eye disease (DED). In addition, to review the evidence for the role of tear osmolarity in the pathophysiology of DED and ocular surface disease. METHODS: A literature review of all publications after the year 2000, which included the keywords “tear osmolarity”, was conducted. Relevant articles were graded according to quality of evidence and research, using the University of Michigan Practice Guideline and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) rating systems. Articles were further categorized by the nature of any reported financial support and by the overall impression they provided related to tear osmolarity. RESULTS: A total of 164 articles were identified as relevant to the search criteria, although some were editorials, and some were written in a foreign language. Of the total, it was possible to grade 159, and an overall impression was generated for 163. A positive impression of tear osmolarity in DED diagnosis was evident in 72% (117/163) of all articles, with a neutral impression in a further 21% (35/163); 7% had a negative impression. The percentage of positive impressions appeared independent of the quality of research; 73% (38/52) of articles graded high/moderate quality supported the use of tear film osmolarity measurement in DED diagnosis. Impressions were also independent of the source of financial support, with 72% (75/104) of independent studies positive. CONCLUSION: The literature broadly supports the use of tear film osmolarity as an objective numerical measure for diagnosing, grading severity, and managing treatment of DED. Dove Medical Press 2015-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4636089/ /pubmed/26586933 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S95242 Text en © 2015 Potvin et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Potvin, Richard
Makari, Sarah
Rapuano, Christopher J
Tear film osmolarity and dry eye disease: a review of the literature
title Tear film osmolarity and dry eye disease: a review of the literature
title_full Tear film osmolarity and dry eye disease: a review of the literature
title_fullStr Tear film osmolarity and dry eye disease: a review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Tear film osmolarity and dry eye disease: a review of the literature
title_short Tear film osmolarity and dry eye disease: a review of the literature
title_sort tear film osmolarity and dry eye disease: a review of the literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4636089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26586933
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S95242
work_keys_str_mv AT potvinrichard tearfilmosmolarityanddryeyediseaseareviewoftheliterature
AT makarisarah tearfilmosmolarityanddryeyediseaseareviewoftheliterature
AT rapuanochristopherj tearfilmosmolarityanddryeyediseaseareviewoftheliterature