Cargando…

Comparative Study of Non-Enveloped Icosahedral Viruses Size

Now, as before, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is a widely used technique for the determination of virions size. In some studies, dynamic light scattering (DLS) has also been applied for this purpose. Data obtained by different authors and using different methods could vary significantly. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nikitin, Nikolai, Trifonova, Ekaterina, Evtushenko, Evgeniy, Kirpichnikov, Mikhail, Atabekov, Joseph, Karpova, Olga
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4636260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26545232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142415
_version_ 1782399626621485056
author Nikitin, Nikolai
Trifonova, Ekaterina
Evtushenko, Evgeniy
Kirpichnikov, Mikhail
Atabekov, Joseph
Karpova, Olga
author_facet Nikitin, Nikolai
Trifonova, Ekaterina
Evtushenko, Evgeniy
Kirpichnikov, Mikhail
Atabekov, Joseph
Karpova, Olga
author_sort Nikitin, Nikolai
collection PubMed
description Now, as before, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is a widely used technique for the determination of virions size. In some studies, dynamic light scattering (DLS) has also been applied for this purpose. Data obtained by different authors and using different methods could vary significantly. The process of TEM sample preparation involves drying on the substrate, which can cause virions to undergo morphology changes. Therefore, other techniques should be used for measurements of virions size in liquid, (i.e. under conditions closer to native). DLS and nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) provide supplementary data about the virions hydrodynamic diameter and aggregation state in liquid. In contrast to DLS, NTA data have a higher resolution and also are less sensitive to minor admixtures. In the present work, the size of non-enveloped icosahedral viruses of different nature was analyzed by TEM, DLS and NTA: the viruses used were the encephalomyocarditis virus (animal virus), and cauliflower mosaic virus, brome mosaic virus and bean mild mosaic virus (plant viruses). The same, freshly purified, samples of each virus were used for analysis using the different techniques. The results were compared with earlier published data and description databases. DLS data about the hydrodynamic diameter of bean mild mosaic virus, and NTA data for all examined viruses, were obtained for the first time. For all virus samples, the values of size obtained by TEM were less than virions sizes determined by DLS and NTA. The contribution of the electrical double layer (EDL) in virions hydrodynamic diameter was evaluated. DLS and NTA data adjusted for EDL thickness were in better agreement with TEM results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4636260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46362602015-11-13 Comparative Study of Non-Enveloped Icosahedral Viruses Size Nikitin, Nikolai Trifonova, Ekaterina Evtushenko, Evgeniy Kirpichnikov, Mikhail Atabekov, Joseph Karpova, Olga PLoS One Research Article Now, as before, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is a widely used technique for the determination of virions size. In some studies, dynamic light scattering (DLS) has also been applied for this purpose. Data obtained by different authors and using different methods could vary significantly. The process of TEM sample preparation involves drying on the substrate, which can cause virions to undergo morphology changes. Therefore, other techniques should be used for measurements of virions size in liquid, (i.e. under conditions closer to native). DLS and nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) provide supplementary data about the virions hydrodynamic diameter and aggregation state in liquid. In contrast to DLS, NTA data have a higher resolution and also are less sensitive to minor admixtures. In the present work, the size of non-enveloped icosahedral viruses of different nature was analyzed by TEM, DLS and NTA: the viruses used were the encephalomyocarditis virus (animal virus), and cauliflower mosaic virus, brome mosaic virus and bean mild mosaic virus (plant viruses). The same, freshly purified, samples of each virus were used for analysis using the different techniques. The results were compared with earlier published data and description databases. DLS data about the hydrodynamic diameter of bean mild mosaic virus, and NTA data for all examined viruses, were obtained for the first time. For all virus samples, the values of size obtained by TEM were less than virions sizes determined by DLS and NTA. The contribution of the electrical double layer (EDL) in virions hydrodynamic diameter was evaluated. DLS and NTA data adjusted for EDL thickness were in better agreement with TEM results. Public Library of Science 2015-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4636260/ /pubmed/26545232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142415 Text en © 2015 Nikitin et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nikitin, Nikolai
Trifonova, Ekaterina
Evtushenko, Evgeniy
Kirpichnikov, Mikhail
Atabekov, Joseph
Karpova, Olga
Comparative Study of Non-Enveloped Icosahedral Viruses Size
title Comparative Study of Non-Enveloped Icosahedral Viruses Size
title_full Comparative Study of Non-Enveloped Icosahedral Viruses Size
title_fullStr Comparative Study of Non-Enveloped Icosahedral Viruses Size
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study of Non-Enveloped Icosahedral Viruses Size
title_short Comparative Study of Non-Enveloped Icosahedral Viruses Size
title_sort comparative study of non-enveloped icosahedral viruses size
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4636260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26545232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142415
work_keys_str_mv AT nikitinnikolai comparativestudyofnonenvelopedicosahedralvirusessize
AT trifonovaekaterina comparativestudyofnonenvelopedicosahedralvirusessize
AT evtushenkoevgeniy comparativestudyofnonenvelopedicosahedralvirusessize
AT kirpichnikovmikhail comparativestudyofnonenvelopedicosahedralvirusessize
AT atabekovjoseph comparativestudyofnonenvelopedicosahedralvirusessize
AT karpovaolga comparativestudyofnonenvelopedicosahedralvirusessize