Cargando…

Laboratory and clinical trials of cocamide diethanolamine lotion against head lice

Context. During the late 1990s, insecticide resistance had rendered a number of treatment products ineffective; some companies saw this as an opportunity to develop alternative types of treatment. We investigated the possibility that a surfactant-based lotion containing 10% cocamide diethanolamine (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burgess, Ian F., Brunton, Elizabeth R., Brown, Christine M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4636399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26557439
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1368
_version_ 1782399653404213248
author Burgess, Ian F.
Brunton, Elizabeth R.
Brown, Christine M.
author_facet Burgess, Ian F.
Brunton, Elizabeth R.
Brown, Christine M.
author_sort Burgess, Ian F.
collection PubMed
description Context. During the late 1990s, insecticide resistance had rendered a number of treatment products ineffective; some companies saw this as an opportunity to develop alternative types of treatment. We investigated the possibility that a surfactant-based lotion containing 10% cocamide diethanolamine (cocamide DEA) was effective to eliminate head louse infestation. Settings and Design. Initial in vitro testing of the lotion formulation versus laboratory reared body/clothing lice, followed by two randomised, controlled, community-based, assessor blinded, clinical studies. Materials and Methods. Preliminary laboratory tests were performed by exposing lice or louse eggs to the product using a method that mimicked the intended use. Clinical Study 1: Children and adults with confirmed head louse infestation were treated by investigators using a single application of aqueous 10% cocamide DEA lotion applied for 60 min followed by shampooing or a single 1% permethrin creme rinse treatment applied to pre-washed hair for 10 min. Clinical Study 2: Compared two treatment regimens using 10% cocamide DEA lotion that was concentrated by hair drying. A single application left on for 8 h/overnight was compared with two applications 7 days apart of 2 h duration, followed by a shampoo wash. Results. The initial laboratory tests showed a pediculicidal effect for a 60 min application but limited ovicidal effect. A longer application time of 8 h or overnight was found capable of killing all eggs but this differed between batches of test material. Clinical Study 1: Both treatments performed badly with only 3/23 (13%) successful treatments using cocamide DEA and 5/25 (23.8%) using permethrin. Clinical Study 2: The single overnight application of cocamide DEA concentrated by hair drying gave 10/56 (17.9%) successes compared with 19/56 (33.9%) for the 2 h application regimen repeated after 1 week. Intention to treat analysis showed no significant difference (p = 0.0523) between the treatments. Over the two studies, there were 18 adverse events possibly or probably associated with treatment, most of which were increased pruritus after treatment. Conclusions. Cocamide DEA 10% lotion, even when concentrated by hair drying, showed limited activity to eliminate head louse infestation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4636399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46363992015-11-09 Laboratory and clinical trials of cocamide diethanolamine lotion against head lice Burgess, Ian F. Brunton, Elizabeth R. Brown, Christine M. PeerJ Clinical Trials Context. During the late 1990s, insecticide resistance had rendered a number of treatment products ineffective; some companies saw this as an opportunity to develop alternative types of treatment. We investigated the possibility that a surfactant-based lotion containing 10% cocamide diethanolamine (cocamide DEA) was effective to eliminate head louse infestation. Settings and Design. Initial in vitro testing of the lotion formulation versus laboratory reared body/clothing lice, followed by two randomised, controlled, community-based, assessor blinded, clinical studies. Materials and Methods. Preliminary laboratory tests were performed by exposing lice or louse eggs to the product using a method that mimicked the intended use. Clinical Study 1: Children and adults with confirmed head louse infestation were treated by investigators using a single application of aqueous 10% cocamide DEA lotion applied for 60 min followed by shampooing or a single 1% permethrin creme rinse treatment applied to pre-washed hair for 10 min. Clinical Study 2: Compared two treatment regimens using 10% cocamide DEA lotion that was concentrated by hair drying. A single application left on for 8 h/overnight was compared with two applications 7 days apart of 2 h duration, followed by a shampoo wash. Results. The initial laboratory tests showed a pediculicidal effect for a 60 min application but limited ovicidal effect. A longer application time of 8 h or overnight was found capable of killing all eggs but this differed between batches of test material. Clinical Study 1: Both treatments performed badly with only 3/23 (13%) successful treatments using cocamide DEA and 5/25 (23.8%) using permethrin. Clinical Study 2: The single overnight application of cocamide DEA concentrated by hair drying gave 10/56 (17.9%) successes compared with 19/56 (33.9%) for the 2 h application regimen repeated after 1 week. Intention to treat analysis showed no significant difference (p = 0.0523) between the treatments. Over the two studies, there were 18 adverse events possibly or probably associated with treatment, most of which were increased pruritus after treatment. Conclusions. Cocamide DEA 10% lotion, even when concentrated by hair drying, showed limited activity to eliminate head louse infestation. PeerJ Inc. 2015-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4636399/ /pubmed/26557439 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1368 Text en © 2015 Burgess et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Trials
Burgess, Ian F.
Brunton, Elizabeth R.
Brown, Christine M.
Laboratory and clinical trials of cocamide diethanolamine lotion against head lice
title Laboratory and clinical trials of cocamide diethanolamine lotion against head lice
title_full Laboratory and clinical trials of cocamide diethanolamine lotion against head lice
title_fullStr Laboratory and clinical trials of cocamide diethanolamine lotion against head lice
title_full_unstemmed Laboratory and clinical trials of cocamide diethanolamine lotion against head lice
title_short Laboratory and clinical trials of cocamide diethanolamine lotion against head lice
title_sort laboratory and clinical trials of cocamide diethanolamine lotion against head lice
topic Clinical Trials
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4636399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26557439
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1368
work_keys_str_mv AT burgessianf laboratoryandclinicaltrialsofcocamidediethanolaminelotionagainstheadlice
AT bruntonelizabethr laboratoryandclinicaltrialsofcocamidediethanolaminelotionagainstheadlice
AT brownchristinem laboratoryandclinicaltrialsofcocamidediethanolaminelotionagainstheadlice