Cargando…

Perception of electronic cigarettes in the general population: does their usefulness outweigh their risks?

OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare the perceptions of the general population about the harmful effects of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) on users and on those passively exposed to e-cigarettes and the perceptions about e-cigarette usefulness for reducing or eliminating tobacco smoking. DESIGN,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martínez-Sánchez, Jose M, Fu, Marcela, Martín-Sánchez, Juan Carlos, Ballbè, Montse, Saltó, Esteve, Fernández, Esteve
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4636602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26534735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009218
_version_ 1782399674561331200
author Martínez-Sánchez, Jose M
Fu, Marcela
Martín-Sánchez, Juan Carlos
Ballbè, Montse
Saltó, Esteve
Fernández, Esteve
author_facet Martínez-Sánchez, Jose M
Fu, Marcela
Martín-Sánchez, Juan Carlos
Ballbè, Montse
Saltó, Esteve
Fernández, Esteve
author_sort Martínez-Sánchez, Jose M
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare the perceptions of the general population about the harmful effects of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) on users and on those passively exposed to e-cigarettes and the perceptions about e-cigarette usefulness for reducing or eliminating tobacco smoking. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We analysed cross-sectional data from a longitudinal study of a representative sample of the general adult (≥16 years) population of Barcelona, Spain (336 men and 400 women). The fieldwork was conducted between May 2013 and February 2014. We computed the percentages, adjusted OR and their corresponding 95% CI among participants with some awareness of e-cigarettes (79.2% of the sample). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We assessed the perception about harmfulness for e-cigarette users and for passively exposed non-e-cigarette users, as well as the perception of usefulness for smokers of cigarette cessation and reduction. RESULTS: In this sample, 40.1% thought that e-cigarettes had a harmful effect on users, and 27.1% thought that e-cigarettes had a harmful effect on passively exposed bystanders (p<0.001). Particularly, more never-smokers perceived that e-cigarettes had harmful effects on passively exposed bystanders than current smokers (34.4% vs 20.6%; OR=1.93, 95% CI 1.02 to 3.63). More people perceived e-cigarettes as being useful for reducing smoking than for quitting (50.6% vs 29.9%, p<0.001), as well as for reducing smoking than as being harmful to users (50.6% vs 40.1%, p=0.044). DISCUSSION: The perception that e-cigarettes are useful for reducing tobacco consumption was more prevalent than the perception that e-cigarettes are harmful to users and to those passively exposed to e-cigarettes. Advertisements and messages about the use of e-cigarettes and their harmful effects should be regulated and based on scientific evidence to avoid creating erroneous ideas about their use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4636602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46366022015-11-13 Perception of electronic cigarettes in the general population: does their usefulness outweigh their risks? Martínez-Sánchez, Jose M Fu, Marcela Martín-Sánchez, Juan Carlos Ballbè, Montse Saltó, Esteve Fernández, Esteve BMJ Open Smoking and Tobacco OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare the perceptions of the general population about the harmful effects of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) on users and on those passively exposed to e-cigarettes and the perceptions about e-cigarette usefulness for reducing or eliminating tobacco smoking. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We analysed cross-sectional data from a longitudinal study of a representative sample of the general adult (≥16 years) population of Barcelona, Spain (336 men and 400 women). The fieldwork was conducted between May 2013 and February 2014. We computed the percentages, adjusted OR and their corresponding 95% CI among participants with some awareness of e-cigarettes (79.2% of the sample). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We assessed the perception about harmfulness for e-cigarette users and for passively exposed non-e-cigarette users, as well as the perception of usefulness for smokers of cigarette cessation and reduction. RESULTS: In this sample, 40.1% thought that e-cigarettes had a harmful effect on users, and 27.1% thought that e-cigarettes had a harmful effect on passively exposed bystanders (p<0.001). Particularly, more never-smokers perceived that e-cigarettes had harmful effects on passively exposed bystanders than current smokers (34.4% vs 20.6%; OR=1.93, 95% CI 1.02 to 3.63). More people perceived e-cigarettes as being useful for reducing smoking than for quitting (50.6% vs 29.9%, p<0.001), as well as for reducing smoking than as being harmful to users (50.6% vs 40.1%, p=0.044). DISCUSSION: The perception that e-cigarettes are useful for reducing tobacco consumption was more prevalent than the perception that e-cigarettes are harmful to users and to those passively exposed to e-cigarettes. Advertisements and messages about the use of e-cigarettes and their harmful effects should be regulated and based on scientific evidence to avoid creating erroneous ideas about their use. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4636602/ /pubmed/26534735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009218 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Smoking and Tobacco
Martínez-Sánchez, Jose M
Fu, Marcela
Martín-Sánchez, Juan Carlos
Ballbè, Montse
Saltó, Esteve
Fernández, Esteve
Perception of electronic cigarettes in the general population: does their usefulness outweigh their risks?
title Perception of electronic cigarettes in the general population: does their usefulness outweigh their risks?
title_full Perception of electronic cigarettes in the general population: does their usefulness outweigh their risks?
title_fullStr Perception of electronic cigarettes in the general population: does their usefulness outweigh their risks?
title_full_unstemmed Perception of electronic cigarettes in the general population: does their usefulness outweigh their risks?
title_short Perception of electronic cigarettes in the general population: does their usefulness outweigh their risks?
title_sort perception of electronic cigarettes in the general population: does their usefulness outweigh their risks?
topic Smoking and Tobacco
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4636602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26534735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009218
work_keys_str_mv AT martinezsanchezjosem perceptionofelectroniccigarettesinthegeneralpopulationdoestheirusefulnessoutweightheirrisks
AT fumarcela perceptionofelectroniccigarettesinthegeneralpopulationdoestheirusefulnessoutweightheirrisks
AT martinsanchezjuancarlos perceptionofelectroniccigarettesinthegeneralpopulationdoestheirusefulnessoutweightheirrisks
AT ballbemontse perceptionofelectroniccigarettesinthegeneralpopulationdoestheirusefulnessoutweightheirrisks
AT saltoesteve perceptionofelectroniccigarettesinthegeneralpopulationdoestheirusefulnessoutweightheirrisks
AT fernandezesteve perceptionofelectroniccigarettesinthegeneralpopulationdoestheirusefulnessoutweightheirrisks