Cargando…

Disparities in health and access to healthcare between asylum seekers and residents in Germany: a population-based cross-sectional feasibility study

OBJECTIVES: To assess disparities in health and healthcare between asylum seekers (AS) and residents in Germany as a proof of concept using European Core Health Indicators (ECHI). DESIGN: Population-based cross-sectional feasibility study. PARTICIPANTS: All AS (aged 18 years or above) registered in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schneider, Christine, Joos, Stefanie, Bozorgmehr, Kayvan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4636623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26537498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008784
_version_ 1782399679386877952
author Schneider, Christine
Joos, Stefanie
Bozorgmehr, Kayvan
author_facet Schneider, Christine
Joos, Stefanie
Bozorgmehr, Kayvan
author_sort Schneider, Christine
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess disparities in health and healthcare between asylum seekers (AS) and residents in Germany as a proof of concept using European Core Health Indicators (ECHI). DESIGN: Population-based cross-sectional feasibility study. PARTICIPANTS: All AS (aged 18 years or above) registered in three counties in Germany during a 3-month study period (N=1017). Cross-sectional data on the resident population were taken from the German Health Interview (2008–2011, N=8152), and the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (2012, N=23 065). OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported health status and healthcare access (utilisation and unmet medical need) in line with ECHI. METHOD: Inequalities in health and access to healthcare were quantified both by crude and age-stratified/sex-stratified ORs with 95% CI using cross-tabulations. RESULTS: A total of N=156 AS (15.34%) participated in the study. Compared with residents, AS were significantly more likely to report a bad health status (OR=1.72 (1.23 to 2.41)), activity limitations (OR=1.97 (1.39 to 2.79)) or (only younger age groups) any chronic morbidity (18–24 years: OR=6.23 (2.62 to 14.57); 25–49 years: OR=2.05 (1.23 to 3.37)). AS had significantly lower odds for consulting any physician (OR=0.1 (0.07 to 0.16)) or general practitioners (OR=0.44 (0.31 to 0.62)), but higher odds for hospital admissions (OR=2.29 (1.54 to 3.34)), visits to psychotherapists (OR=4.07 (2.48 to 6.43)) and unmet needs (OR=3.74 (2.62 to 5.21)). The direction of healthcare-related associations was consistent across all strata despite variation in magnitude and statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Quantifying disparities between AS and the resident population by means of selected ECHI proved to be feasible. The approach yielded first quantitative evidence for disparities in health and access to healthcare in the German context. Further research is needed to generate representative estimates, for example, by including AS in national health monitoring programmes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4636623
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46366232015-11-13 Disparities in health and access to healthcare between asylum seekers and residents in Germany: a population-based cross-sectional feasibility study Schneider, Christine Joos, Stefanie Bozorgmehr, Kayvan BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: To assess disparities in health and healthcare between asylum seekers (AS) and residents in Germany as a proof of concept using European Core Health Indicators (ECHI). DESIGN: Population-based cross-sectional feasibility study. PARTICIPANTS: All AS (aged 18 years or above) registered in three counties in Germany during a 3-month study period (N=1017). Cross-sectional data on the resident population were taken from the German Health Interview (2008–2011, N=8152), and the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (2012, N=23 065). OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported health status and healthcare access (utilisation and unmet medical need) in line with ECHI. METHOD: Inequalities in health and access to healthcare were quantified both by crude and age-stratified/sex-stratified ORs with 95% CI using cross-tabulations. RESULTS: A total of N=156 AS (15.34%) participated in the study. Compared with residents, AS were significantly more likely to report a bad health status (OR=1.72 (1.23 to 2.41)), activity limitations (OR=1.97 (1.39 to 2.79)) or (only younger age groups) any chronic morbidity (18–24 years: OR=6.23 (2.62 to 14.57); 25–49 years: OR=2.05 (1.23 to 3.37)). AS had significantly lower odds for consulting any physician (OR=0.1 (0.07 to 0.16)) or general practitioners (OR=0.44 (0.31 to 0.62)), but higher odds for hospital admissions (OR=2.29 (1.54 to 3.34)), visits to psychotherapists (OR=4.07 (2.48 to 6.43)) and unmet needs (OR=3.74 (2.62 to 5.21)). The direction of healthcare-related associations was consistent across all strata despite variation in magnitude and statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Quantifying disparities between AS and the resident population by means of selected ECHI proved to be feasible. The approach yielded first quantitative evidence for disparities in health and access to healthcare in the German context. Further research is needed to generate representative estimates, for example, by including AS in national health monitoring programmes. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4636623/ /pubmed/26537498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008784 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Schneider, Christine
Joos, Stefanie
Bozorgmehr, Kayvan
Disparities in health and access to healthcare between asylum seekers and residents in Germany: a population-based cross-sectional feasibility study
title Disparities in health and access to healthcare between asylum seekers and residents in Germany: a population-based cross-sectional feasibility study
title_full Disparities in health and access to healthcare between asylum seekers and residents in Germany: a population-based cross-sectional feasibility study
title_fullStr Disparities in health and access to healthcare between asylum seekers and residents in Germany: a population-based cross-sectional feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Disparities in health and access to healthcare between asylum seekers and residents in Germany: a population-based cross-sectional feasibility study
title_short Disparities in health and access to healthcare between asylum seekers and residents in Germany: a population-based cross-sectional feasibility study
title_sort disparities in health and access to healthcare between asylum seekers and residents in germany: a population-based cross-sectional feasibility study
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4636623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26537498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008784
work_keys_str_mv AT schneiderchristine disparitiesinhealthandaccesstohealthcarebetweenasylumseekersandresidentsingermanyapopulationbasedcrosssectionalfeasibilitystudy
AT joosstefanie disparitiesinhealthandaccesstohealthcarebetweenasylumseekersandresidentsingermanyapopulationbasedcrosssectionalfeasibilitystudy
AT bozorgmehrkayvan disparitiesinhealthandaccesstohealthcarebetweenasylumseekersandresidentsingermanyapopulationbasedcrosssectionalfeasibilitystudy