Cargando…

How different terminology for ductal carcinoma in situ impacts women's concern and treatment preferences: a randomised comparison within a national community survey

OBJECTIVE: There have been calls to remove ‘carcinoma’ from terminology for in situ cancers such as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), to reduce overdiagnosis and overtreatment. We investigated the effect of describing DCIS as ‘abnormal cells’ versus ‘pre-invasive breast cancer cells’ on women's...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCaffery, Kirsten, Nickel, Brooke, Moynihan, Ray, Hersch, Jolyn, Teixeira-Pinto, Armando, Irwig, Les, Barratt, Alexandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4636630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26525720
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008094
_version_ 1782399681011122176
author McCaffery, Kirsten
Nickel, Brooke
Moynihan, Ray
Hersch, Jolyn
Teixeira-Pinto, Armando
Irwig, Les
Barratt, Alexandra
author_facet McCaffery, Kirsten
Nickel, Brooke
Moynihan, Ray
Hersch, Jolyn
Teixeira-Pinto, Armando
Irwig, Les
Barratt, Alexandra
author_sort McCaffery, Kirsten
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: There have been calls to remove ‘carcinoma’ from terminology for in situ cancers such as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), to reduce overdiagnosis and overtreatment. We investigated the effect of describing DCIS as ‘abnormal cells’ versus ‘pre-invasive breast cancer cells’ on women's concern and treatment preferences. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Community sample of Australian women (n=269) who spoke English as their main language at home. DESIGN: Randomised comparison within a community survey. Women considered a hypothetical scenario involving a diagnosis of DCIS described as either ‘abnormal cells’ (arm A) or ‘pre-invasive breast cancer cells’ (arm B). Within each arm, the initial description was followed by the alternative term and outcomes reassessed. RESULTS: Women in both arms indicated high concern, but still indicated strong initial preferences for watchful waiting (64%). There were no differences in initial concern or preferences by trial arm. However, more women in arm A (‘abnormal cells’ first term) indicated they would feel more concerned if given the alternative term (‘pre-invasive breast cancer cells’) compared to women in arm B who received the terms in the opposite order (67% arm A vs 52% arm B would feel more concerned, p=0.001). More women in arm A also changed their preference towards treatment when the terminology was switched from ‘abnormal cells’ to ‘pre-invasive breast cancer cells’ compared to arm B. In arm A, 18% of women changed their preference to treatment while only 6% changed to watchful waiting (p=0.008). In contrast, there were no significant changes in treatment preference in arm B when the terminology was switched (9% vs 8% changed their stated preference). CONCLUSIONS: In a hypothetical scenario, interest in watchful waiting for DCIS was high, and changing terminology impacted women's concern and treatment preferences. Removal of the cancer term from DCIS may assist in efforts towards reducing overtreatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4636630
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46366302015-11-13 How different terminology for ductal carcinoma in situ impacts women's concern and treatment preferences: a randomised comparison within a national community survey McCaffery, Kirsten Nickel, Brooke Moynihan, Ray Hersch, Jolyn Teixeira-Pinto, Armando Irwig, Les Barratt, Alexandra BMJ Open Communication OBJECTIVE: There have been calls to remove ‘carcinoma’ from terminology for in situ cancers such as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), to reduce overdiagnosis and overtreatment. We investigated the effect of describing DCIS as ‘abnormal cells’ versus ‘pre-invasive breast cancer cells’ on women's concern and treatment preferences. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Community sample of Australian women (n=269) who spoke English as their main language at home. DESIGN: Randomised comparison within a community survey. Women considered a hypothetical scenario involving a diagnosis of DCIS described as either ‘abnormal cells’ (arm A) or ‘pre-invasive breast cancer cells’ (arm B). Within each arm, the initial description was followed by the alternative term and outcomes reassessed. RESULTS: Women in both arms indicated high concern, but still indicated strong initial preferences for watchful waiting (64%). There were no differences in initial concern or preferences by trial arm. However, more women in arm A (‘abnormal cells’ first term) indicated they would feel more concerned if given the alternative term (‘pre-invasive breast cancer cells’) compared to women in arm B who received the terms in the opposite order (67% arm A vs 52% arm B would feel more concerned, p=0.001). More women in arm A also changed their preference towards treatment when the terminology was switched from ‘abnormal cells’ to ‘pre-invasive breast cancer cells’ compared to arm B. In arm A, 18% of women changed their preference to treatment while only 6% changed to watchful waiting (p=0.008). In contrast, there were no significant changes in treatment preference in arm B when the terminology was switched (9% vs 8% changed their stated preference). CONCLUSIONS: In a hypothetical scenario, interest in watchful waiting for DCIS was high, and changing terminology impacted women's concern and treatment preferences. Removal of the cancer term from DCIS may assist in efforts towards reducing overtreatment. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4636630/ /pubmed/26525720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008094 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Communication
McCaffery, Kirsten
Nickel, Brooke
Moynihan, Ray
Hersch, Jolyn
Teixeira-Pinto, Armando
Irwig, Les
Barratt, Alexandra
How different terminology for ductal carcinoma in situ impacts women's concern and treatment preferences: a randomised comparison within a national community survey
title How different terminology for ductal carcinoma in situ impacts women's concern and treatment preferences: a randomised comparison within a national community survey
title_full How different terminology for ductal carcinoma in situ impacts women's concern and treatment preferences: a randomised comparison within a national community survey
title_fullStr How different terminology for ductal carcinoma in situ impacts women's concern and treatment preferences: a randomised comparison within a national community survey
title_full_unstemmed How different terminology for ductal carcinoma in situ impacts women's concern and treatment preferences: a randomised comparison within a national community survey
title_short How different terminology for ductal carcinoma in situ impacts women's concern and treatment preferences: a randomised comparison within a national community survey
title_sort how different terminology for ductal carcinoma in situ impacts women's concern and treatment preferences: a randomised comparison within a national community survey
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4636630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26525720
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008094
work_keys_str_mv AT mccafferykirsten howdifferentterminologyforductalcarcinomainsituimpactswomensconcernandtreatmentpreferencesarandomisedcomparisonwithinanationalcommunitysurvey
AT nickelbrooke howdifferentterminologyforductalcarcinomainsituimpactswomensconcernandtreatmentpreferencesarandomisedcomparisonwithinanationalcommunitysurvey
AT moynihanray howdifferentterminologyforductalcarcinomainsituimpactswomensconcernandtreatmentpreferencesarandomisedcomparisonwithinanationalcommunitysurvey
AT herschjolyn howdifferentterminologyforductalcarcinomainsituimpactswomensconcernandtreatmentpreferencesarandomisedcomparisonwithinanationalcommunitysurvey
AT teixeirapintoarmando howdifferentterminologyforductalcarcinomainsituimpactswomensconcernandtreatmentpreferencesarandomisedcomparisonwithinanationalcommunitysurvey
AT irwigles howdifferentterminologyforductalcarcinomainsituimpactswomensconcernandtreatmentpreferencesarandomisedcomparisonwithinanationalcommunitysurvey
AT barrattalexandra howdifferentterminologyforductalcarcinomainsituimpactswomensconcernandtreatmentpreferencesarandomisedcomparisonwithinanationalcommunitysurvey