Cargando…
The impact of meeting locations for men having sex with men on the risk for bacterial sexually transmitted infections: analyses from a cross-sectional online survey
OBJECTIVES: Opportunities for men having sex with men (MSM) to meet each other have very much improved by new communication technologies. Meeting venue-based characteristics can impact how many partners are met and how much sexual risk is taken. We analysed the association between physical and virtu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4636635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26537499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009107 |
_version_ | 1782399682207547392 |
---|---|
author | Marcus, U an der Heiden, M Gassowski, M Kruspe, M Drewes, J |
author_facet | Marcus, U an der Heiden, M Gassowski, M Kruspe, M Drewes, J |
author_sort | Marcus, U |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Opportunities for men having sex with men (MSM) to meet each other have very much improved by new communication technologies. Meeting venue-based characteristics can impact how many partners are met and how much sexual risk is taken. We analysed the association between physical and virtual venues and the risk for bacterial sexually transmitted infections (bSTIs) among participants in an MSM online survey. METHODS: Data were collected during 2013/2014 with a survey targeting MSM living in Germany. The impact of the meeting place with the last non-steady anal sex partner on diagnosis with a bSTI in the previous year was analysed using bivariate and multivariate regression analysis, taking into account self-reported HIV status, serostatus communication, condom use, partner number, age and city size. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 8878 respondents (7799 not diagnosed with HIV; 1079 diagnosed with HIV). Meeting partners online was most common (62% HIV−/51% HIV+), followed by sex venues (11% HIV−/25% HIV+); other venues were each reported by 2–6% of the respondents. Venue-dependent proportions reporting bSTIs in the recent year were 2–4 folds higher among men diagnosed with HIV. In multivariate analysis, HIV status was the strongest predictor for bSTIs (OR=5.0; 95% CI 2.8 to 8.7). Compared with meeting partners online, sex (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.0 to 2.5) and social venues (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.4 to 2.6) were associated with increased bSTI risk for men not diagnosed with HIV, but the risk when meeting partners by smartphone apps was only of borderline significance (OR 1.5; 95% CI 0.9 to 2.3). For men diagnosed with HIV, bSTI risk increased for sex venues (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.1 to 2.1), and was lower for non-gay/other venues (OR 0.2; 95% CI 0.1 to 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Venues are connected to social-behavioural facets of corresponding sexual encounters, and may be important arenas for differential HIV and STI education, treatment and prevention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4636635 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46366352015-11-13 The impact of meeting locations for men having sex with men on the risk for bacterial sexually transmitted infections: analyses from a cross-sectional online survey Marcus, U an der Heiden, M Gassowski, M Kruspe, M Drewes, J BMJ Open Sexual Health OBJECTIVES: Opportunities for men having sex with men (MSM) to meet each other have very much improved by new communication technologies. Meeting venue-based characteristics can impact how many partners are met and how much sexual risk is taken. We analysed the association between physical and virtual venues and the risk for bacterial sexually transmitted infections (bSTIs) among participants in an MSM online survey. METHODS: Data were collected during 2013/2014 with a survey targeting MSM living in Germany. The impact of the meeting place with the last non-steady anal sex partner on diagnosis with a bSTI in the previous year was analysed using bivariate and multivariate regression analysis, taking into account self-reported HIV status, serostatus communication, condom use, partner number, age and city size. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 8878 respondents (7799 not diagnosed with HIV; 1079 diagnosed with HIV). Meeting partners online was most common (62% HIV−/51% HIV+), followed by sex venues (11% HIV−/25% HIV+); other venues were each reported by 2–6% of the respondents. Venue-dependent proportions reporting bSTIs in the recent year were 2–4 folds higher among men diagnosed with HIV. In multivariate analysis, HIV status was the strongest predictor for bSTIs (OR=5.0; 95% CI 2.8 to 8.7). Compared with meeting partners online, sex (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.0 to 2.5) and social venues (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.4 to 2.6) were associated with increased bSTI risk for men not diagnosed with HIV, but the risk when meeting partners by smartphone apps was only of borderline significance (OR 1.5; 95% CI 0.9 to 2.3). For men diagnosed with HIV, bSTI risk increased for sex venues (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.1 to 2.1), and was lower for non-gay/other venues (OR 0.2; 95% CI 0.1 to 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Venues are connected to social-behavioural facets of corresponding sexual encounters, and may be important arenas for differential HIV and STI education, treatment and prevention. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4636635/ /pubmed/26537499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009107 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Sexual Health Marcus, U an der Heiden, M Gassowski, M Kruspe, M Drewes, J The impact of meeting locations for men having sex with men on the risk for bacterial sexually transmitted infections: analyses from a cross-sectional online survey |
title | The impact of meeting locations for men having sex with men on the risk for bacterial sexually transmitted infections: analyses from a cross-sectional online survey |
title_full | The impact of meeting locations for men having sex with men on the risk for bacterial sexually transmitted infections: analyses from a cross-sectional online survey |
title_fullStr | The impact of meeting locations for men having sex with men on the risk for bacterial sexually transmitted infections: analyses from a cross-sectional online survey |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of meeting locations for men having sex with men on the risk for bacterial sexually transmitted infections: analyses from a cross-sectional online survey |
title_short | The impact of meeting locations for men having sex with men on the risk for bacterial sexually transmitted infections: analyses from a cross-sectional online survey |
title_sort | impact of meeting locations for men having sex with men on the risk for bacterial sexually transmitted infections: analyses from a cross-sectional online survey |
topic | Sexual Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4636635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26537499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009107 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marcusu theimpactofmeetinglocationsformenhavingsexwithmenontheriskforbacterialsexuallytransmittedinfectionsanalysesfromacrosssectionalonlinesurvey AT anderheidenm theimpactofmeetinglocationsformenhavingsexwithmenontheriskforbacterialsexuallytransmittedinfectionsanalysesfromacrosssectionalonlinesurvey AT gassowskim theimpactofmeetinglocationsformenhavingsexwithmenontheriskforbacterialsexuallytransmittedinfectionsanalysesfromacrosssectionalonlinesurvey AT kruspem theimpactofmeetinglocationsformenhavingsexwithmenontheriskforbacterialsexuallytransmittedinfectionsanalysesfromacrosssectionalonlinesurvey AT drewesj theimpactofmeetinglocationsformenhavingsexwithmenontheriskforbacterialsexuallytransmittedinfectionsanalysesfromacrosssectionalonlinesurvey AT marcusu impactofmeetinglocationsformenhavingsexwithmenontheriskforbacterialsexuallytransmittedinfectionsanalysesfromacrosssectionalonlinesurvey AT anderheidenm impactofmeetinglocationsformenhavingsexwithmenontheriskforbacterialsexuallytransmittedinfectionsanalysesfromacrosssectionalonlinesurvey AT gassowskim impactofmeetinglocationsformenhavingsexwithmenontheriskforbacterialsexuallytransmittedinfectionsanalysesfromacrosssectionalonlinesurvey AT kruspem impactofmeetinglocationsformenhavingsexwithmenontheriskforbacterialsexuallytransmittedinfectionsanalysesfromacrosssectionalonlinesurvey AT drewesj impactofmeetinglocationsformenhavingsexwithmenontheriskforbacterialsexuallytransmittedinfectionsanalysesfromacrosssectionalonlinesurvey |