Cargando…

The impact of meeting locations for men having sex with men on the risk for bacterial sexually transmitted infections: analyses from a cross-sectional online survey

OBJECTIVES: Opportunities for men having sex with men (MSM) to meet each other have very much improved by new communication technologies. Meeting venue-based characteristics can impact how many partners are met and how much sexual risk is taken. We analysed the association between physical and virtu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marcus, U, an der Heiden, M, Gassowski, M, Kruspe, M, Drewes, J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4636635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26537499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009107
_version_ 1782399682207547392
author Marcus, U
an der Heiden, M
Gassowski, M
Kruspe, M
Drewes, J
author_facet Marcus, U
an der Heiden, M
Gassowski, M
Kruspe, M
Drewes, J
author_sort Marcus, U
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Opportunities for men having sex with men (MSM) to meet each other have very much improved by new communication technologies. Meeting venue-based characteristics can impact how many partners are met and how much sexual risk is taken. We analysed the association between physical and virtual venues and the risk for bacterial sexually transmitted infections (bSTIs) among participants in an MSM online survey. METHODS: Data were collected during 2013/2014 with a survey targeting MSM living in Germany. The impact of the meeting place with the last non-steady anal sex partner on diagnosis with a bSTI in the previous year was analysed using bivariate and multivariate regression analysis, taking into account self-reported HIV status, serostatus communication, condom use, partner number, age and city size. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 8878 respondents (7799 not diagnosed with HIV; 1079 diagnosed with HIV). Meeting partners online was most common (62% HIV−/51% HIV+), followed by sex venues (11% HIV−/25% HIV+); other venues were each reported by 2–6% of the respondents. Venue-dependent proportions reporting bSTIs in the recent year were 2–4 folds higher among men diagnosed with HIV. In multivariate analysis, HIV status was the strongest predictor for bSTIs (OR=5.0; 95% CI 2.8 to 8.7). Compared with meeting partners online, sex (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.0 to 2.5) and social venues (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.4 to 2.6) were associated with increased bSTI risk for men not diagnosed with HIV, but the risk when meeting partners by smartphone apps was only of borderline significance (OR 1.5; 95% CI 0.9 to 2.3). For men diagnosed with HIV, bSTI risk increased for sex venues (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.1 to 2.1), and was lower for non-gay/other venues (OR 0.2; 95% CI 0.1 to 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Venues are connected to social-behavioural facets of corresponding sexual encounters, and may be important arenas for differential HIV and STI education, treatment and prevention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4636635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46366352015-11-13 The impact of meeting locations for men having sex with men on the risk for bacterial sexually transmitted infections: analyses from a cross-sectional online survey Marcus, U an der Heiden, M Gassowski, M Kruspe, M Drewes, J BMJ Open Sexual Health OBJECTIVES: Opportunities for men having sex with men (MSM) to meet each other have very much improved by new communication technologies. Meeting venue-based characteristics can impact how many partners are met and how much sexual risk is taken. We analysed the association between physical and virtual venues and the risk for bacterial sexually transmitted infections (bSTIs) among participants in an MSM online survey. METHODS: Data were collected during 2013/2014 with a survey targeting MSM living in Germany. The impact of the meeting place with the last non-steady anal sex partner on diagnosis with a bSTI in the previous year was analysed using bivariate and multivariate regression analysis, taking into account self-reported HIV status, serostatus communication, condom use, partner number, age and city size. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 8878 respondents (7799 not diagnosed with HIV; 1079 diagnosed with HIV). Meeting partners online was most common (62% HIV−/51% HIV+), followed by sex venues (11% HIV−/25% HIV+); other venues were each reported by 2–6% of the respondents. Venue-dependent proportions reporting bSTIs in the recent year were 2–4 folds higher among men diagnosed with HIV. In multivariate analysis, HIV status was the strongest predictor for bSTIs (OR=5.0; 95% CI 2.8 to 8.7). Compared with meeting partners online, sex (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.0 to 2.5) and social venues (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.4 to 2.6) were associated with increased bSTI risk for men not diagnosed with HIV, but the risk when meeting partners by smartphone apps was only of borderline significance (OR 1.5; 95% CI 0.9 to 2.3). For men diagnosed with HIV, bSTI risk increased for sex venues (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.1 to 2.1), and was lower for non-gay/other venues (OR 0.2; 95% CI 0.1 to 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Venues are connected to social-behavioural facets of corresponding sexual encounters, and may be important arenas for differential HIV and STI education, treatment and prevention. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4636635/ /pubmed/26537499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009107 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Sexual Health
Marcus, U
an der Heiden, M
Gassowski, M
Kruspe, M
Drewes, J
The impact of meeting locations for men having sex with men on the risk for bacterial sexually transmitted infections: analyses from a cross-sectional online survey
title The impact of meeting locations for men having sex with men on the risk for bacterial sexually transmitted infections: analyses from a cross-sectional online survey
title_full The impact of meeting locations for men having sex with men on the risk for bacterial sexually transmitted infections: analyses from a cross-sectional online survey
title_fullStr The impact of meeting locations for men having sex with men on the risk for bacterial sexually transmitted infections: analyses from a cross-sectional online survey
title_full_unstemmed The impact of meeting locations for men having sex with men on the risk for bacterial sexually transmitted infections: analyses from a cross-sectional online survey
title_short The impact of meeting locations for men having sex with men on the risk for bacterial sexually transmitted infections: analyses from a cross-sectional online survey
title_sort impact of meeting locations for men having sex with men on the risk for bacterial sexually transmitted infections: analyses from a cross-sectional online survey
topic Sexual Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4636635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26537499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009107
work_keys_str_mv AT marcusu theimpactofmeetinglocationsformenhavingsexwithmenontheriskforbacterialsexuallytransmittedinfectionsanalysesfromacrosssectionalonlinesurvey
AT anderheidenm theimpactofmeetinglocationsformenhavingsexwithmenontheriskforbacterialsexuallytransmittedinfectionsanalysesfromacrosssectionalonlinesurvey
AT gassowskim theimpactofmeetinglocationsformenhavingsexwithmenontheriskforbacterialsexuallytransmittedinfectionsanalysesfromacrosssectionalonlinesurvey
AT kruspem theimpactofmeetinglocationsformenhavingsexwithmenontheriskforbacterialsexuallytransmittedinfectionsanalysesfromacrosssectionalonlinesurvey
AT drewesj theimpactofmeetinglocationsformenhavingsexwithmenontheriskforbacterialsexuallytransmittedinfectionsanalysesfromacrosssectionalonlinesurvey
AT marcusu impactofmeetinglocationsformenhavingsexwithmenontheriskforbacterialsexuallytransmittedinfectionsanalysesfromacrosssectionalonlinesurvey
AT anderheidenm impactofmeetinglocationsformenhavingsexwithmenontheriskforbacterialsexuallytransmittedinfectionsanalysesfromacrosssectionalonlinesurvey
AT gassowskim impactofmeetinglocationsformenhavingsexwithmenontheriskforbacterialsexuallytransmittedinfectionsanalysesfromacrosssectionalonlinesurvey
AT kruspem impactofmeetinglocationsformenhavingsexwithmenontheriskforbacterialsexuallytransmittedinfectionsanalysesfromacrosssectionalonlinesurvey
AT drewesj impactofmeetinglocationsformenhavingsexwithmenontheriskforbacterialsexuallytransmittedinfectionsanalysesfromacrosssectionalonlinesurvey