Cargando…

Association of rule of law and health outcomes: an ecological study

OBJECTIVES: To explore whether the rule of law is a foundational determinant of health that underlies other socioeconomic, political and cultural factors that have been associated with health outcomes. SETTING: Global project. PARTICIPANTS: Data set of 96 countries, comprising 91% of the global popu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pinzon-Rondon, Angela Maria, Attaran, Amir, Botero, Juan Carlos, Ruiz-Sternberg, Angela Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4636637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26515684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007004
_version_ 1782399682681503744
author Pinzon-Rondon, Angela Maria
Attaran, Amir
Botero, Juan Carlos
Ruiz-Sternberg, Angela Maria
author_facet Pinzon-Rondon, Angela Maria
Attaran, Amir
Botero, Juan Carlos
Ruiz-Sternberg, Angela Maria
author_sort Pinzon-Rondon, Angela Maria
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To explore whether the rule of law is a foundational determinant of health that underlies other socioeconomic, political and cultural factors that have been associated with health outcomes. SETTING: Global project. PARTICIPANTS: Data set of 96 countries, comprising 91% of the global population. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The following health indicators, infant mortality rate, maternal mortality rate, life expectancy, and cardiovascular disease and diabetes mortality rate, were included to explore their association with the rule of law. We used a novel Rule of Law Index, gathered from survey sources, in a cross-sectional and ecological design. The Index is based on eight subindices: (1) Constraints on Government Powers; (2) Absence of Corruption; (3) Order and Security; (4) Fundamental Rights; (5) Open Government; (6) Regulatory Enforcement, (7) Civil Justice; and (8) Criminal Justice. RESULTS: The rule of law showed an independent association with infant mortality rate, maternal mortality rate, life expectancy, and cardiovascular disease and diabetes mortality rate, after adjusting for the countries’ level of per capita income, their expenditures in health, their level of political and civil freedom, their Gini measure of inequality and women's status (p<0.05). Rule of law remained significant in all the multivariate models, and the following adjustment for potential confounders remained robust for at least one or more of the health outcomes across all eight subindices of the rule of law. Findings show that the higher the country's level of adherence to the rule of law, the better the health of the population. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to start considering the country's adherence to the rule of law as a foundational determinant of health. Health advocates should consider the improvement of rule of law as a tool to improve population health. Conversely, lack of progress in rule of law may constitute a structural barrier to health improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4636637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46366372015-11-13 Association of rule of law and health outcomes: an ecological study Pinzon-Rondon, Angela Maria Attaran, Amir Botero, Juan Carlos Ruiz-Sternberg, Angela Maria BMJ Open Global Health OBJECTIVES: To explore whether the rule of law is a foundational determinant of health that underlies other socioeconomic, political and cultural factors that have been associated with health outcomes. SETTING: Global project. PARTICIPANTS: Data set of 96 countries, comprising 91% of the global population. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The following health indicators, infant mortality rate, maternal mortality rate, life expectancy, and cardiovascular disease and diabetes mortality rate, were included to explore their association with the rule of law. We used a novel Rule of Law Index, gathered from survey sources, in a cross-sectional and ecological design. The Index is based on eight subindices: (1) Constraints on Government Powers; (2) Absence of Corruption; (3) Order and Security; (4) Fundamental Rights; (5) Open Government; (6) Regulatory Enforcement, (7) Civil Justice; and (8) Criminal Justice. RESULTS: The rule of law showed an independent association with infant mortality rate, maternal mortality rate, life expectancy, and cardiovascular disease and diabetes mortality rate, after adjusting for the countries’ level of per capita income, their expenditures in health, their level of political and civil freedom, their Gini measure of inequality and women's status (p<0.05). Rule of law remained significant in all the multivariate models, and the following adjustment for potential confounders remained robust for at least one or more of the health outcomes across all eight subindices of the rule of law. Findings show that the higher the country's level of adherence to the rule of law, the better the health of the population. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to start considering the country's adherence to the rule of law as a foundational determinant of health. Health advocates should consider the improvement of rule of law as a tool to improve population health. Conversely, lack of progress in rule of law may constitute a structural barrier to health improvement. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4636637/ /pubmed/26515684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007004 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Global Health
Pinzon-Rondon, Angela Maria
Attaran, Amir
Botero, Juan Carlos
Ruiz-Sternberg, Angela Maria
Association of rule of law and health outcomes: an ecological study
title Association of rule of law and health outcomes: an ecological study
title_full Association of rule of law and health outcomes: an ecological study
title_fullStr Association of rule of law and health outcomes: an ecological study
title_full_unstemmed Association of rule of law and health outcomes: an ecological study
title_short Association of rule of law and health outcomes: an ecological study
title_sort association of rule of law and health outcomes: an ecological study
topic Global Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4636637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26515684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007004
work_keys_str_mv AT pinzonrondonangelamaria associationofruleoflawandhealthoutcomesanecologicalstudy
AT attaranamir associationofruleoflawandhealthoutcomesanecologicalstudy
AT boterojuancarlos associationofruleoflawandhealthoutcomesanecologicalstudy
AT ruizsternbergangelamaria associationofruleoflawandhealthoutcomesanecologicalstudy