Cargando…

The impact of early surgical intervention in free intestinal perforation: a time-to-intervention pilot study

PURPOSES: An abdominal inflammatory focus is the second most often source of sepsis with a high risk of death in surgical intensive care units. By establishing evidence-based bundled strategies the surviving sepsis campaign provided an optimized rapid and continuous treatment of these emergency pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hecker, Andreas, Schneck, E., Röhrig, R., Roller, F., Hecker, B., Holler, J., Koch, C., Hecker, M., Reichert, M., Lichtenstern, C., Krombach, G. A., Padberg, W., Weigand, M. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4636838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26550026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-015-0047-0
_version_ 1782399715518709760
author Hecker, Andreas
Schneck, E.
Röhrig, R.
Roller, F.
Hecker, B.
Holler, J.
Koch, C.
Hecker, M.
Reichert, M.
Lichtenstern, C.
Krombach, G. A.
Padberg, W.
Weigand, M. A.
author_facet Hecker, Andreas
Schneck, E.
Röhrig, R.
Roller, F.
Hecker, B.
Holler, J.
Koch, C.
Hecker, M.
Reichert, M.
Lichtenstern, C.
Krombach, G. A.
Padberg, W.
Weigand, M. A.
author_sort Hecker, Andreas
collection PubMed
description PURPOSES: An abdominal inflammatory focus is the second most often source of sepsis with a high risk of death in surgical intensive care units. By establishing evidence-based bundled strategies the surviving sepsis campaign provided an optimized rapid and continuous treatment of these emergency patients. Hereby the hospital mortality decreased from 35 to 30 %. Sepsis treatment is based on three major therapeutic elements: surgical treatment (source control), antiinfective treatment, and supportive care. The international guidelines of the surviving sepsis campaign were updated recently and recommend rapid diagnosis of the infection and source control within the first 12 h after the diagnosis (grade 1c). Interestingly this recommendation is mainly based on studies on soft tissue infections. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis 76 septic patients with an intraabdominal inflammatory focus were included. All patients underwent surgery at different time-points after diagnosis. RESULTS: With 80 % patients of the early intervention group had an improved overall survival (vs. 73 % in the late intervention group). CONCLUSIONS: Literature on the time dependency of early source control is rare and in part contradicting. Results of this pilot study reveal that immediate surgical intervention might be of advantage for septic emergency patients. Further multi-center approaches will be necessary to evaluate, whether the TTI has any impact on the outcome of septic patients with intestinal perforation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4636838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46368382015-11-08 The impact of early surgical intervention in free intestinal perforation: a time-to-intervention pilot study Hecker, Andreas Schneck, E. Röhrig, R. Roller, F. Hecker, B. Holler, J. Koch, C. Hecker, M. Reichert, M. Lichtenstern, C. Krombach, G. A. Padberg, W. Weigand, M. A. World J Emerg Surg Research Article PURPOSES: An abdominal inflammatory focus is the second most often source of sepsis with a high risk of death in surgical intensive care units. By establishing evidence-based bundled strategies the surviving sepsis campaign provided an optimized rapid and continuous treatment of these emergency patients. Hereby the hospital mortality decreased from 35 to 30 %. Sepsis treatment is based on three major therapeutic elements: surgical treatment (source control), antiinfective treatment, and supportive care. The international guidelines of the surviving sepsis campaign were updated recently and recommend rapid diagnosis of the infection and source control within the first 12 h after the diagnosis (grade 1c). Interestingly this recommendation is mainly based on studies on soft tissue infections. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis 76 septic patients with an intraabdominal inflammatory focus were included. All patients underwent surgery at different time-points after diagnosis. RESULTS: With 80 % patients of the early intervention group had an improved overall survival (vs. 73 % in the late intervention group). CONCLUSIONS: Literature on the time dependency of early source control is rare and in part contradicting. Results of this pilot study reveal that immediate surgical intervention might be of advantage for septic emergency patients. Further multi-center approaches will be necessary to evaluate, whether the TTI has any impact on the outcome of septic patients with intestinal perforation. BioMed Central 2015-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4636838/ /pubmed/26550026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-015-0047-0 Text en © Hecker et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hecker, Andreas
Schneck, E.
Röhrig, R.
Roller, F.
Hecker, B.
Holler, J.
Koch, C.
Hecker, M.
Reichert, M.
Lichtenstern, C.
Krombach, G. A.
Padberg, W.
Weigand, M. A.
The impact of early surgical intervention in free intestinal perforation: a time-to-intervention pilot study
title The impact of early surgical intervention in free intestinal perforation: a time-to-intervention pilot study
title_full The impact of early surgical intervention in free intestinal perforation: a time-to-intervention pilot study
title_fullStr The impact of early surgical intervention in free intestinal perforation: a time-to-intervention pilot study
title_full_unstemmed The impact of early surgical intervention in free intestinal perforation: a time-to-intervention pilot study
title_short The impact of early surgical intervention in free intestinal perforation: a time-to-intervention pilot study
title_sort impact of early surgical intervention in free intestinal perforation: a time-to-intervention pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4636838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26550026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-015-0047-0
work_keys_str_mv AT heckerandreas theimpactofearlysurgicalinterventioninfreeintestinalperforationatimetointerventionpilotstudy
AT schnecke theimpactofearlysurgicalinterventioninfreeintestinalperforationatimetointerventionpilotstudy
AT rohrigr theimpactofearlysurgicalinterventioninfreeintestinalperforationatimetointerventionpilotstudy
AT rollerf theimpactofearlysurgicalinterventioninfreeintestinalperforationatimetointerventionpilotstudy
AT heckerb theimpactofearlysurgicalinterventioninfreeintestinalperforationatimetointerventionpilotstudy
AT hollerj theimpactofearlysurgicalinterventioninfreeintestinalperforationatimetointerventionpilotstudy
AT kochc theimpactofearlysurgicalinterventioninfreeintestinalperforationatimetointerventionpilotstudy
AT heckerm theimpactofearlysurgicalinterventioninfreeintestinalperforationatimetointerventionpilotstudy
AT reichertm theimpactofearlysurgicalinterventioninfreeintestinalperforationatimetointerventionpilotstudy
AT lichtensternc theimpactofearlysurgicalinterventioninfreeintestinalperforationatimetointerventionpilotstudy
AT krombachga theimpactofearlysurgicalinterventioninfreeintestinalperforationatimetointerventionpilotstudy
AT padbergw theimpactofearlysurgicalinterventioninfreeintestinalperforationatimetointerventionpilotstudy
AT weigandma theimpactofearlysurgicalinterventioninfreeintestinalperforationatimetointerventionpilotstudy
AT heckerandreas impactofearlysurgicalinterventioninfreeintestinalperforationatimetointerventionpilotstudy
AT schnecke impactofearlysurgicalinterventioninfreeintestinalperforationatimetointerventionpilotstudy
AT rohrigr impactofearlysurgicalinterventioninfreeintestinalperforationatimetointerventionpilotstudy
AT rollerf impactofearlysurgicalinterventioninfreeintestinalperforationatimetointerventionpilotstudy
AT heckerb impactofearlysurgicalinterventioninfreeintestinalperforationatimetointerventionpilotstudy
AT hollerj impactofearlysurgicalinterventioninfreeintestinalperforationatimetointerventionpilotstudy
AT kochc impactofearlysurgicalinterventioninfreeintestinalperforationatimetointerventionpilotstudy
AT heckerm impactofearlysurgicalinterventioninfreeintestinalperforationatimetointerventionpilotstudy
AT reichertm impactofearlysurgicalinterventioninfreeintestinalperforationatimetointerventionpilotstudy
AT lichtensternc impactofearlysurgicalinterventioninfreeintestinalperforationatimetointerventionpilotstudy
AT krombachga impactofearlysurgicalinterventioninfreeintestinalperforationatimetointerventionpilotstudy
AT padbergw impactofearlysurgicalinterventioninfreeintestinalperforationatimetointerventionpilotstudy
AT weigandma impactofearlysurgicalinterventioninfreeintestinalperforationatimetointerventionpilotstudy