Cargando…

Structure Matters: The Role of Clique Hierarchy in the Relationship Between Adolescent Social Status and Aggression and Prosociality

Peer cliques form an important context for the social development of adolescents. Although clique members are often similar in social status, also within cliques, status differences exist. How differences in social status between clique members are related to behaviors of its individual members is r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pattiselanno, Kim, Dijkstra, Jan Kornelis, Steglich, Christian, Vollebergh, Wilma, Veenstra, René
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4636991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26077559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0310-4
_version_ 1782399728091136000
author Pattiselanno, Kim
Dijkstra, Jan Kornelis
Steglich, Christian
Vollebergh, Wilma
Veenstra, René
author_facet Pattiselanno, Kim
Dijkstra, Jan Kornelis
Steglich, Christian
Vollebergh, Wilma
Veenstra, René
author_sort Pattiselanno, Kim
collection PubMed
description Peer cliques form an important context for the social development of adolescents. Although clique members are often similar in social status, also within cliques, status differences exist. How differences in social status between clique members are related to behaviors of its individual members is rather unknown. This study examined to what extent the relationship of individual social status (i.e., perceived popularity) with aggression and prosocial behavior depends on the level of internal clique hierarchy. The sample consists of 2674 adolescents (49.8 % boys), with a mean age of 14.02. We focused specifically on physical and relational aggression, and practical and emotional support, because these behaviors have shown to be of great importance for social relationships and social standing among adolescents. The internal status hierarchy of cliques was based on the variation in individual social status between clique members (i.e., clique hierarchization) and the structure of status scores within a clique (pyramid shape, inverted pyramid, or equal distribution of social status scores) (i.e., clique status structure). The results showed that differences in aggressive and prosocial behaviors were particularly moderated by clique status structure: aggression was stronger related to individual social status in (girls’) cliques where the clique status structure reflected an inverted pyramid with relatively more high status adolescents within the clique than low status peers, and prosocial behavior showed a significant relationship with individual social status, again predominantly in inverted pyramid structured (boys’ and girls’) cliques. Furthermore, these effects differed by types of gender cliques: the associations were found in same gender but not mixed-gender cliques. The findings stress the importance of taking into account internal clique characteristics when studying adolescent social status in relationship to aggression and prosociality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4636991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46369912015-11-12 Structure Matters: The Role of Clique Hierarchy in the Relationship Between Adolescent Social Status and Aggression and Prosociality Pattiselanno, Kim Dijkstra, Jan Kornelis Steglich, Christian Vollebergh, Wilma Veenstra, René J Youth Adolesc Empirical Research Peer cliques form an important context for the social development of adolescents. Although clique members are often similar in social status, also within cliques, status differences exist. How differences in social status between clique members are related to behaviors of its individual members is rather unknown. This study examined to what extent the relationship of individual social status (i.e., perceived popularity) with aggression and prosocial behavior depends on the level of internal clique hierarchy. The sample consists of 2674 adolescents (49.8 % boys), with a mean age of 14.02. We focused specifically on physical and relational aggression, and practical and emotional support, because these behaviors have shown to be of great importance for social relationships and social standing among adolescents. The internal status hierarchy of cliques was based on the variation in individual social status between clique members (i.e., clique hierarchization) and the structure of status scores within a clique (pyramid shape, inverted pyramid, or equal distribution of social status scores) (i.e., clique status structure). The results showed that differences in aggressive and prosocial behaviors were particularly moderated by clique status structure: aggression was stronger related to individual social status in (girls’) cliques where the clique status structure reflected an inverted pyramid with relatively more high status adolescents within the clique than low status peers, and prosocial behavior showed a significant relationship with individual social status, again predominantly in inverted pyramid structured (boys’ and girls’) cliques. Furthermore, these effects differed by types of gender cliques: the associations were found in same gender but not mixed-gender cliques. The findings stress the importance of taking into account internal clique characteristics when studying adolescent social status in relationship to aggression and prosociality. Springer US 2015-06-16 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4636991/ /pubmed/26077559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0310-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Empirical Research
Pattiselanno, Kim
Dijkstra, Jan Kornelis
Steglich, Christian
Vollebergh, Wilma
Veenstra, René
Structure Matters: The Role of Clique Hierarchy in the Relationship Between Adolescent Social Status and Aggression and Prosociality
title Structure Matters: The Role of Clique Hierarchy in the Relationship Between Adolescent Social Status and Aggression and Prosociality
title_full Structure Matters: The Role of Clique Hierarchy in the Relationship Between Adolescent Social Status and Aggression and Prosociality
title_fullStr Structure Matters: The Role of Clique Hierarchy in the Relationship Between Adolescent Social Status and Aggression and Prosociality
title_full_unstemmed Structure Matters: The Role of Clique Hierarchy in the Relationship Between Adolescent Social Status and Aggression and Prosociality
title_short Structure Matters: The Role of Clique Hierarchy in the Relationship Between Adolescent Social Status and Aggression and Prosociality
title_sort structure matters: the role of clique hierarchy in the relationship between adolescent social status and aggression and prosociality
topic Empirical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4636991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26077559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0310-4
work_keys_str_mv AT pattiselannokim structurematterstheroleofcliquehierarchyintherelationshipbetweenadolescentsocialstatusandaggressionandprosociality
AT dijkstrajankornelis structurematterstheroleofcliquehierarchyintherelationshipbetweenadolescentsocialstatusandaggressionandprosociality
AT steglichchristian structurematterstheroleofcliquehierarchyintherelationshipbetweenadolescentsocialstatusandaggressionandprosociality
AT volleberghwilma structurematterstheroleofcliquehierarchyintherelationshipbetweenadolescentsocialstatusandaggressionandprosociality
AT veenstrarene structurematterstheroleofcliquehierarchyintherelationshipbetweenadolescentsocialstatusandaggressionandprosociality