Cargando…

Opportunity costs of carbon sequestration in a forest concession in central Africa

BACKGROUND: A large proportion of the tropical rain forests of central Africa undergo periodic selective logging for timber harvesting. The REDD+ mechanism could promote less intensive logging if revenue from the additional carbon stored in the forest compensates financially for the reduced timber y...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ndjondo, Michel, Gourlet-Fleury, Sylvie, Manlay, Raphaël J, Engone Obiang, Nestor Laurier, Ngomanda, Alfred, Romero, Claudia, Claeys, Florian, Picard, Nicolas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4637000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26568769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-014-0004-3
_version_ 1782399729517199360
author Ndjondo, Michel
Gourlet-Fleury, Sylvie
Manlay, Raphaël J
Engone Obiang, Nestor Laurier
Ngomanda, Alfred
Romero, Claudia
Claeys, Florian
Picard, Nicolas
author_facet Ndjondo, Michel
Gourlet-Fleury, Sylvie
Manlay, Raphaël J
Engone Obiang, Nestor Laurier
Ngomanda, Alfred
Romero, Claudia
Claeys, Florian
Picard, Nicolas
author_sort Ndjondo, Michel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A large proportion of the tropical rain forests of central Africa undergo periodic selective logging for timber harvesting. The REDD+ mechanism could promote less intensive logging if revenue from the additional carbon stored in the forest compensates financially for the reduced timber yield. RESULTS: Carbon stocks, and timber yields, and their associated values, were predicted at the scale of a forest concession in Gabon over a project scenario of 40 yr with reduced logging intensity. Considering that the timber contribution margin (i.e. the selling price of timber minus its production costs) varies between 10 and US$40 m (−3), the minimum price of carbon that enables carbon revenues to compensate forgone timber benefits ranges between US$4.4 and US$25.9/tCO (2) depending on the management scenario implemented. CONCLUSIONS: Where multiple suppliers of emission reductions compete in a REDD+ carbon market, tropical timber companies are likely to change their management practices only if very favourable conditions are met, namely if the timber contribution margin remains low enough and if alternative management practices and associated incentives are appropriately chosen. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13021-014-0004-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4637000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46370002015-11-12 Opportunity costs of carbon sequestration in a forest concession in central Africa Ndjondo, Michel Gourlet-Fleury, Sylvie Manlay, Raphaël J Engone Obiang, Nestor Laurier Ngomanda, Alfred Romero, Claudia Claeys, Florian Picard, Nicolas Carbon Balance Manag Research BACKGROUND: A large proportion of the tropical rain forests of central Africa undergo periodic selective logging for timber harvesting. The REDD+ mechanism could promote less intensive logging if revenue from the additional carbon stored in the forest compensates financially for the reduced timber yield. RESULTS: Carbon stocks, and timber yields, and their associated values, were predicted at the scale of a forest concession in Gabon over a project scenario of 40 yr with reduced logging intensity. Considering that the timber contribution margin (i.e. the selling price of timber minus its production costs) varies between 10 and US$40 m (−3), the minimum price of carbon that enables carbon revenues to compensate forgone timber benefits ranges between US$4.4 and US$25.9/tCO (2) depending on the management scenario implemented. CONCLUSIONS: Where multiple suppliers of emission reductions compete in a REDD+ carbon market, tropical timber companies are likely to change their management practices only if very favourable conditions are met, namely if the timber contribution margin remains low enough and if alternative management practices and associated incentives are appropriately chosen. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13021-014-0004-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2014-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4637000/ /pubmed/26568769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-014-0004-3 Text en © Ndjondo et al.; licensee Springer 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research
Ndjondo, Michel
Gourlet-Fleury, Sylvie
Manlay, Raphaël J
Engone Obiang, Nestor Laurier
Ngomanda, Alfred
Romero, Claudia
Claeys, Florian
Picard, Nicolas
Opportunity costs of carbon sequestration in a forest concession in central Africa
title Opportunity costs of carbon sequestration in a forest concession in central Africa
title_full Opportunity costs of carbon sequestration in a forest concession in central Africa
title_fullStr Opportunity costs of carbon sequestration in a forest concession in central Africa
title_full_unstemmed Opportunity costs of carbon sequestration in a forest concession in central Africa
title_short Opportunity costs of carbon sequestration in a forest concession in central Africa
title_sort opportunity costs of carbon sequestration in a forest concession in central africa
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4637000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26568769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-014-0004-3
work_keys_str_mv AT ndjondomichel opportunitycostsofcarbonsequestrationinaforestconcessionincentralafrica
AT gourletfleurysylvie opportunitycostsofcarbonsequestrationinaforestconcessionincentralafrica
AT manlayraphaelj opportunitycostsofcarbonsequestrationinaforestconcessionincentralafrica
AT engoneobiangnestorlaurier opportunitycostsofcarbonsequestrationinaforestconcessionincentralafrica
AT ngomandaalfred opportunitycostsofcarbonsequestrationinaforestconcessionincentralafrica
AT romeroclaudia opportunitycostsofcarbonsequestrationinaforestconcessionincentralafrica
AT claeysflorian opportunitycostsofcarbonsequestrationinaforestconcessionincentralafrica
AT picardnicolas opportunitycostsofcarbonsequestrationinaforestconcessionincentralafrica