Cargando…
Opportunity costs of carbon sequestration in a forest concession in central Africa
BACKGROUND: A large proportion of the tropical rain forests of central Africa undergo periodic selective logging for timber harvesting. The REDD+ mechanism could promote less intensive logging if revenue from the additional carbon stored in the forest compensates financially for the reduced timber y...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4637000/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26568769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-014-0004-3 |
_version_ | 1782399729517199360 |
---|---|
author | Ndjondo, Michel Gourlet-Fleury, Sylvie Manlay, Raphaël J Engone Obiang, Nestor Laurier Ngomanda, Alfred Romero, Claudia Claeys, Florian Picard, Nicolas |
author_facet | Ndjondo, Michel Gourlet-Fleury, Sylvie Manlay, Raphaël J Engone Obiang, Nestor Laurier Ngomanda, Alfred Romero, Claudia Claeys, Florian Picard, Nicolas |
author_sort | Ndjondo, Michel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A large proportion of the tropical rain forests of central Africa undergo periodic selective logging for timber harvesting. The REDD+ mechanism could promote less intensive logging if revenue from the additional carbon stored in the forest compensates financially for the reduced timber yield. RESULTS: Carbon stocks, and timber yields, and their associated values, were predicted at the scale of a forest concession in Gabon over a project scenario of 40 yr with reduced logging intensity. Considering that the timber contribution margin (i.e. the selling price of timber minus its production costs) varies between 10 and US$40 m (−3), the minimum price of carbon that enables carbon revenues to compensate forgone timber benefits ranges between US$4.4 and US$25.9/tCO (2) depending on the management scenario implemented. CONCLUSIONS: Where multiple suppliers of emission reductions compete in a REDD+ carbon market, tropical timber companies are likely to change their management practices only if very favourable conditions are met, namely if the timber contribution margin remains low enough and if alternative management practices and associated incentives are appropriately chosen. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13021-014-0004-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4637000 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46370002015-11-12 Opportunity costs of carbon sequestration in a forest concession in central Africa Ndjondo, Michel Gourlet-Fleury, Sylvie Manlay, Raphaël J Engone Obiang, Nestor Laurier Ngomanda, Alfred Romero, Claudia Claeys, Florian Picard, Nicolas Carbon Balance Manag Research BACKGROUND: A large proportion of the tropical rain forests of central Africa undergo periodic selective logging for timber harvesting. The REDD+ mechanism could promote less intensive logging if revenue from the additional carbon stored in the forest compensates financially for the reduced timber yield. RESULTS: Carbon stocks, and timber yields, and their associated values, were predicted at the scale of a forest concession in Gabon over a project scenario of 40 yr with reduced logging intensity. Considering that the timber contribution margin (i.e. the selling price of timber minus its production costs) varies between 10 and US$40 m (−3), the minimum price of carbon that enables carbon revenues to compensate forgone timber benefits ranges between US$4.4 and US$25.9/tCO (2) depending on the management scenario implemented. CONCLUSIONS: Where multiple suppliers of emission reductions compete in a REDD+ carbon market, tropical timber companies are likely to change their management practices only if very favourable conditions are met, namely if the timber contribution margin remains low enough and if alternative management practices and associated incentives are appropriately chosen. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13021-014-0004-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2014-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4637000/ /pubmed/26568769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-014-0004-3 Text en © Ndjondo et al.; licensee Springer 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Ndjondo, Michel Gourlet-Fleury, Sylvie Manlay, Raphaël J Engone Obiang, Nestor Laurier Ngomanda, Alfred Romero, Claudia Claeys, Florian Picard, Nicolas Opportunity costs of carbon sequestration in a forest concession in central Africa |
title | Opportunity costs of carbon sequestration in a forest concession in central Africa |
title_full | Opportunity costs of carbon sequestration in a forest concession in central Africa |
title_fullStr | Opportunity costs of carbon sequestration in a forest concession in central Africa |
title_full_unstemmed | Opportunity costs of carbon sequestration in a forest concession in central Africa |
title_short | Opportunity costs of carbon sequestration in a forest concession in central Africa |
title_sort | opportunity costs of carbon sequestration in a forest concession in central africa |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4637000/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26568769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-014-0004-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ndjondomichel opportunitycostsofcarbonsequestrationinaforestconcessionincentralafrica AT gourletfleurysylvie opportunitycostsofcarbonsequestrationinaforestconcessionincentralafrica AT manlayraphaelj opportunitycostsofcarbonsequestrationinaforestconcessionincentralafrica AT engoneobiangnestorlaurier opportunitycostsofcarbonsequestrationinaforestconcessionincentralafrica AT ngomandaalfred opportunitycostsofcarbonsequestrationinaforestconcessionincentralafrica AT romeroclaudia opportunitycostsofcarbonsequestrationinaforestconcessionincentralafrica AT claeysflorian opportunitycostsofcarbonsequestrationinaforestconcessionincentralafrica AT picardnicolas opportunitycostsofcarbonsequestrationinaforestconcessionincentralafrica |