Cargando…

Occult Infection in Aseptic Joint Loosening and the Diagnostic Role of Implant Sonication

Our aim was to determine the incidence of occult infection and to examine the role of ultrasound sonication of the implants in cases of presumed aseptic loosening in a prospective trial. Joint swabs, aspirates, and deep tissue samples were obtained from around the prosthesis for routine microbiology...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kempthorne, J. T., Ailabouni, R., Raniga, S., Hammer, D., Hooper, G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4637070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26583149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/946215
_version_ 1782399746420244480
author Kempthorne, J. T.
Ailabouni, R.
Raniga, S.
Hammer, D.
Hooper, G.
author_facet Kempthorne, J. T.
Ailabouni, R.
Raniga, S.
Hammer, D.
Hooper, G.
author_sort Kempthorne, J. T.
collection PubMed
description Our aim was to determine the incidence of occult infection and to examine the role of ultrasound sonication of the implants in cases of presumed aseptic loosening in a prospective trial. Joint swabs, aspirates, and deep tissue samples were obtained from around the prosthesis for routine microbiology. Each prosthesis was sonicated and the sonicate examined with Gram staining and extended cultures. There were 106 joints in the study of which 54 were revised for aseptic loosening and 52 were assigned to the control revision group. There were 9 positive cultures with 8/54 positive cultures in the aseptic loosening group and 1/52 in the control revision group (p = 0.017, associated OR 47.7). We found concordant results between sonication fluid culture and conventional samples in 5/9 cultures. Preoperative inflammatory markers were not prognostic for infection. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was the most commonly cultured organism (7/9). Previously unrecognised infection was present in 15% of patients undergoing revision for aseptic loosening. Ultrasound sonication of the removed prosthesis was less sensitive than conventional sampling techniques. We recommend routine intraoperative sampling for patients having revision for aseptic loosening, but we do not support the routine use of ultrasound sonication for its detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4637070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46370702015-11-18 Occult Infection in Aseptic Joint Loosening and the Diagnostic Role of Implant Sonication Kempthorne, J. T. Ailabouni, R. Raniga, S. Hammer, D. Hooper, G. Biomed Res Int Clinical Study Our aim was to determine the incidence of occult infection and to examine the role of ultrasound sonication of the implants in cases of presumed aseptic loosening in a prospective trial. Joint swabs, aspirates, and deep tissue samples were obtained from around the prosthesis for routine microbiology. Each prosthesis was sonicated and the sonicate examined with Gram staining and extended cultures. There were 106 joints in the study of which 54 were revised for aseptic loosening and 52 were assigned to the control revision group. There were 9 positive cultures with 8/54 positive cultures in the aseptic loosening group and 1/52 in the control revision group (p = 0.017, associated OR 47.7). We found concordant results between sonication fluid culture and conventional samples in 5/9 cultures. Preoperative inflammatory markers were not prognostic for infection. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was the most commonly cultured organism (7/9). Previously unrecognised infection was present in 15% of patients undergoing revision for aseptic loosening. Ultrasound sonication of the removed prosthesis was less sensitive than conventional sampling techniques. We recommend routine intraoperative sampling for patients having revision for aseptic loosening, but we do not support the routine use of ultrasound sonication for its detection. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4637070/ /pubmed/26583149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/946215 Text en Copyright © 2015 J. T. Kempthorne et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Kempthorne, J. T.
Ailabouni, R.
Raniga, S.
Hammer, D.
Hooper, G.
Occult Infection in Aseptic Joint Loosening and the Diagnostic Role of Implant Sonication
title Occult Infection in Aseptic Joint Loosening and the Diagnostic Role of Implant Sonication
title_full Occult Infection in Aseptic Joint Loosening and the Diagnostic Role of Implant Sonication
title_fullStr Occult Infection in Aseptic Joint Loosening and the Diagnostic Role of Implant Sonication
title_full_unstemmed Occult Infection in Aseptic Joint Loosening and the Diagnostic Role of Implant Sonication
title_short Occult Infection in Aseptic Joint Loosening and the Diagnostic Role of Implant Sonication
title_sort occult infection in aseptic joint loosening and the diagnostic role of implant sonication
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4637070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26583149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/946215
work_keys_str_mv AT kempthornejt occultinfectioninasepticjointlooseningandthediagnosticroleofimplantsonication
AT ailabounir occultinfectioninasepticjointlooseningandthediagnosticroleofimplantsonication
AT ranigas occultinfectioninasepticjointlooseningandthediagnosticroleofimplantsonication
AT hammerd occultinfectioninasepticjointlooseningandthediagnosticroleofimplantsonication
AT hooperg occultinfectioninasepticjointlooseningandthediagnosticroleofimplantsonication