Cargando…
Nebulised dornase alfa versus placebo or hypertonic saline in adult critically ill patients: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
BACKGROUND: Nebulised dornase alfa is used off-label in critically ill patients. We aimed to assess the benefits and harms of nebulised dornase alfa versus placebo, no prophylaxis, or hypertonic saline on patient-important outcome measures in adult critically ill patients. METHODS: We performed a sy...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4637143/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26547839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0142-z |
_version_ | 1782399767640276992 |
---|---|
author | Claudius, Casper Perner, Anders Møller, Morten Hylander |
author_facet | Claudius, Casper Perner, Anders Møller, Morten Hylander |
author_sort | Claudius, Casper |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Nebulised dornase alfa is used off-label in critically ill patients. We aimed to assess the benefits and harms of nebulised dornase alfa versus placebo, no prophylaxis, or hypertonic saline on patient-important outcome measures in adult critically ill patients. METHODS: We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) using the Cochrane Collaboration methodology. Eligible trials were randomised clinical trials comparing nebulised dornase alfa with placebo, no prophylaxis, or hypertonic saline. The predefined outcome measures were all-cause mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay, and adverse events. Two reviewers independently assessed trials for inclusion, data extraction, and risk of bias. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by conventional cumulative meta-analysis, and the robustness of the primary estimate was assessed by TSA. RESULTS: Two trials (n = 63) were included; both were judged to have high risk of bias. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality (random effects model RR (95 % CI) 0.73 (0.09–5.77); P = 0.24; I(2) = 30 %). TSA could not be conducted because less than 1 % of the required information size had been accrued. None of the two trials reported adequate and detailed data on any of the secondary outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: We found very low quantity and quality of evidence for use of nebulised dornase alfa in adult critically ill patients in this systematic review with meta-analysis. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), no. CRD442015016047. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-015-0142-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4637143 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46371432015-11-09 Nebulised dornase alfa versus placebo or hypertonic saline in adult critically ill patients: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis Claudius, Casper Perner, Anders Møller, Morten Hylander Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: Nebulised dornase alfa is used off-label in critically ill patients. We aimed to assess the benefits and harms of nebulised dornase alfa versus placebo, no prophylaxis, or hypertonic saline on patient-important outcome measures in adult critically ill patients. METHODS: We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) using the Cochrane Collaboration methodology. Eligible trials were randomised clinical trials comparing nebulised dornase alfa with placebo, no prophylaxis, or hypertonic saline. The predefined outcome measures were all-cause mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay, and adverse events. Two reviewers independently assessed trials for inclusion, data extraction, and risk of bias. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by conventional cumulative meta-analysis, and the robustness of the primary estimate was assessed by TSA. RESULTS: Two trials (n = 63) were included; both were judged to have high risk of bias. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality (random effects model RR (95 % CI) 0.73 (0.09–5.77); P = 0.24; I(2) = 30 %). TSA could not be conducted because less than 1 % of the required information size had been accrued. None of the two trials reported adequate and detailed data on any of the secondary outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: We found very low quantity and quality of evidence for use of nebulised dornase alfa in adult critically ill patients in this systematic review with meta-analysis. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), no. CRD442015016047. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-015-0142-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4637143/ /pubmed/26547839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0142-z Text en © Claudius et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Claudius, Casper Perner, Anders Møller, Morten Hylander Nebulised dornase alfa versus placebo or hypertonic saline in adult critically ill patients: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis |
title | Nebulised dornase alfa versus placebo or hypertonic saline in adult critically ill patients: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis |
title_full | Nebulised dornase alfa versus placebo or hypertonic saline in adult critically ill patients: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis |
title_fullStr | Nebulised dornase alfa versus placebo or hypertonic saline in adult critically ill patients: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Nebulised dornase alfa versus placebo or hypertonic saline in adult critically ill patients: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis |
title_short | Nebulised dornase alfa versus placebo or hypertonic saline in adult critically ill patients: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis |
title_sort | nebulised dornase alfa versus placebo or hypertonic saline in adult critically ill patients: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4637143/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26547839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0142-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT claudiuscasper nebuliseddornasealfaversusplaceboorhypertonicsalineinadultcriticallyillpatientsasystematicreviewofrandomisedclinicaltrialswithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis AT perneranders nebuliseddornasealfaversusplaceboorhypertonicsalineinadultcriticallyillpatientsasystematicreviewofrandomisedclinicaltrialswithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis AT møllermortenhylander nebuliseddornasealfaversusplaceboorhypertonicsalineinadultcriticallyillpatientsasystematicreviewofrandomisedclinicaltrialswithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis |