Cargando…

Practical execution of defect preparation prior to surgical cartilage intervention: results from a representative meeting survey among experts

During a specialised orthopedic meeting held on ‘the state of the art in cartilage defect repair’, all previously fully-registered participants were requested to participate in an electronic survey by the use of a moderator-presented “Power Point Presentation-based” 9-item questionnaire. The aim of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salzmann, Gian M., Niemeyer, Philipp, Vogt, Stephan, Kreuz, Peter, Arnold, Markus, Fritz, Jürgen, Mujeeb, Ayeesha, Rosenberger, Ralf, Steinwachs, Matthias, Angele, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4637330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27385105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1451-3
_version_ 1782399790434222080
author Salzmann, Gian M.
Niemeyer, Philipp
Vogt, Stephan
Kreuz, Peter
Arnold, Markus
Fritz, Jürgen
Mujeeb, Ayeesha
Rosenberger, Ralf
Steinwachs, Matthias
Angele, Peter
author_facet Salzmann, Gian M.
Niemeyer, Philipp
Vogt, Stephan
Kreuz, Peter
Arnold, Markus
Fritz, Jürgen
Mujeeb, Ayeesha
Rosenberger, Ralf
Steinwachs, Matthias
Angele, Peter
author_sort Salzmann, Gian M.
collection PubMed
description During a specialised orthopedic meeting held on ‘the state of the art in cartilage defect repair’, all previously fully-registered participants were requested to participate in an electronic survey by the use of a moderator-presented “Power Point Presentation-based” 9-item questionnaire. The aim of this survey was to assess indication, approach, and treatment execution of cartilage defect debridement prior to planned microfracture (MFX) or autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI). All participants completed the questionnaire (n = 146) resulting in a return rate of 100 %. An uncertainty exists as to whether the removal of the calcifying layer prior to cartilage repair must be carried out or not. The same was true for the acceptability of subchondral bleeding prior to microfracturing and its handling prior to autologous chondrocyte implantation. There is a degree of unanimity among experts regarding the management of osteophytes and bone marrow edema. In a homogenous society collective of consultants that frequently deal with cartilage defective pathologies, there still remain a significant heterogeneity in selected topics of defect debridement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4637330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46373302015-11-12 Practical execution of defect preparation prior to surgical cartilage intervention: results from a representative meeting survey among experts Salzmann, Gian M. Niemeyer, Philipp Vogt, Stephan Kreuz, Peter Arnold, Markus Fritz, Jürgen Mujeeb, Ayeesha Rosenberger, Ralf Steinwachs, Matthias Angele, Peter Springerplus Meeting Report During a specialised orthopedic meeting held on ‘the state of the art in cartilage defect repair’, all previously fully-registered participants were requested to participate in an electronic survey by the use of a moderator-presented “Power Point Presentation-based” 9-item questionnaire. The aim of this survey was to assess indication, approach, and treatment execution of cartilage defect debridement prior to planned microfracture (MFX) or autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI). All participants completed the questionnaire (n = 146) resulting in a return rate of 100 %. An uncertainty exists as to whether the removal of the calcifying layer prior to cartilage repair must be carried out or not. The same was true for the acceptability of subchondral bleeding prior to microfracturing and its handling prior to autologous chondrocyte implantation. There is a degree of unanimity among experts regarding the management of osteophytes and bone marrow edema. In a homogenous society collective of consultants that frequently deal with cartilage defective pathologies, there still remain a significant heterogeneity in selected topics of defect debridement. Springer International Publishing 2015-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4637330/ /pubmed/27385105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1451-3 Text en © Salzmann et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Meeting Report
Salzmann, Gian M.
Niemeyer, Philipp
Vogt, Stephan
Kreuz, Peter
Arnold, Markus
Fritz, Jürgen
Mujeeb, Ayeesha
Rosenberger, Ralf
Steinwachs, Matthias
Angele, Peter
Practical execution of defect preparation prior to surgical cartilage intervention: results from a representative meeting survey among experts
title Practical execution of defect preparation prior to surgical cartilage intervention: results from a representative meeting survey among experts
title_full Practical execution of defect preparation prior to surgical cartilage intervention: results from a representative meeting survey among experts
title_fullStr Practical execution of defect preparation prior to surgical cartilage intervention: results from a representative meeting survey among experts
title_full_unstemmed Practical execution of defect preparation prior to surgical cartilage intervention: results from a representative meeting survey among experts
title_short Practical execution of defect preparation prior to surgical cartilage intervention: results from a representative meeting survey among experts
title_sort practical execution of defect preparation prior to surgical cartilage intervention: results from a representative meeting survey among experts
topic Meeting Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4637330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27385105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1451-3
work_keys_str_mv AT salzmanngianm practicalexecutionofdefectpreparationpriortosurgicalcartilageinterventionresultsfromarepresentativemeetingsurveyamongexperts
AT niemeyerphilipp practicalexecutionofdefectpreparationpriortosurgicalcartilageinterventionresultsfromarepresentativemeetingsurveyamongexperts
AT vogtstephan practicalexecutionofdefectpreparationpriortosurgicalcartilageinterventionresultsfromarepresentativemeetingsurveyamongexperts
AT kreuzpeter practicalexecutionofdefectpreparationpriortosurgicalcartilageinterventionresultsfromarepresentativemeetingsurveyamongexperts
AT arnoldmarkus practicalexecutionofdefectpreparationpriortosurgicalcartilageinterventionresultsfromarepresentativemeetingsurveyamongexperts
AT fritzjurgen practicalexecutionofdefectpreparationpriortosurgicalcartilageinterventionresultsfromarepresentativemeetingsurveyamongexperts
AT mujeebayeesha practicalexecutionofdefectpreparationpriortosurgicalcartilageinterventionresultsfromarepresentativemeetingsurveyamongexperts
AT rosenbergerralf practicalexecutionofdefectpreparationpriortosurgicalcartilageinterventionresultsfromarepresentativemeetingsurveyamongexperts
AT steinwachsmatthias practicalexecutionofdefectpreparationpriortosurgicalcartilageinterventionresultsfromarepresentativemeetingsurveyamongexperts
AT angelepeter practicalexecutionofdefectpreparationpriortosurgicalcartilageinterventionresultsfromarepresentativemeetingsurveyamongexperts