Cargando…

The Effects of Repeated Testing, Simulated Malingering, and Traumatic Brain Injury on High-Precision Measures of Simple Visual Reaction Time

Simple reaction time (SRT), the latency to respond to a stimulus, has been widely used as a basic measure of processing speed. In the current experiments, we examined clinically-relevant properties of a new SRT test that presents visual stimuli to the left or right hemifield at varying stimulus onse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woods, David L., Wyma, John M., Yund, E. William, Herron, Timothy J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4637414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26617505
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00540
_version_ 1782399808800030720
author Woods, David L.
Wyma, John M.
Yund, E. William
Herron, Timothy J.
author_facet Woods, David L.
Wyma, John M.
Yund, E. William
Herron, Timothy J.
author_sort Woods, David L.
collection PubMed
description Simple reaction time (SRT), the latency to respond to a stimulus, has been widely used as a basic measure of processing speed. In the current experiments, we examined clinically-relevant properties of a new SRT test that presents visual stimuli to the left or right hemifield at varying stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs). Experiment 1 examined test-retest reliability in 48 participants who underwent three test sessions at weekly intervals. In the first test, log-transformed (log-SRT) z-scores, corrected for the influence of age and computer-use, were well predicted by regression functions derived from a normative population of 189 control participants. Test-retest reliability of log-SRT z-scores was measured with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.83) and equaled or exceeded those of other SRT tests and other widely used tests of processing speed that are administered manually. No significant learning effects were observed across test sessions. Experiment 2 investigated the same participants when instructed to malinger during a fourth testing session: 94% showed abnormal log-SRT z-scores, with 83% producing log-SRT z-scores exceeding a cutoff of 3.0, a degree of abnormality never seen in full-effort conditions. Thus, a log-SRT z-score cutoff of 3.0 had a sensitivity (83%) and specificity (100%) that equaled or exceeded that of existing symptom validity tests. We argue that even expert malingerers, fully informed of the malingering-detection metric, would be unable to successfully feign impairments on the SRT test because of the precise control of SRT latencies that would be required. Experiment 3 investigated 26 patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) tested more than 1 year post-injury. The 22 patients with mild TBI showed insignificantly faster SRTs than controls, but a small group of four patients with severe TBI showed slowed SRTs. Simple visual reaction time is a reliable measure of processing speed that is sensitive to the effects of malingering and TBI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4637414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46374142015-11-27 The Effects of Repeated Testing, Simulated Malingering, and Traumatic Brain Injury on High-Precision Measures of Simple Visual Reaction Time Woods, David L. Wyma, John M. Yund, E. William Herron, Timothy J. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Simple reaction time (SRT), the latency to respond to a stimulus, has been widely used as a basic measure of processing speed. In the current experiments, we examined clinically-relevant properties of a new SRT test that presents visual stimuli to the left or right hemifield at varying stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs). Experiment 1 examined test-retest reliability in 48 participants who underwent three test sessions at weekly intervals. In the first test, log-transformed (log-SRT) z-scores, corrected for the influence of age and computer-use, were well predicted by regression functions derived from a normative population of 189 control participants. Test-retest reliability of log-SRT z-scores was measured with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.83) and equaled or exceeded those of other SRT tests and other widely used tests of processing speed that are administered manually. No significant learning effects were observed across test sessions. Experiment 2 investigated the same participants when instructed to malinger during a fourth testing session: 94% showed abnormal log-SRT z-scores, with 83% producing log-SRT z-scores exceeding a cutoff of 3.0, a degree of abnormality never seen in full-effort conditions. Thus, a log-SRT z-score cutoff of 3.0 had a sensitivity (83%) and specificity (100%) that equaled or exceeded that of existing symptom validity tests. We argue that even expert malingerers, fully informed of the malingering-detection metric, would be unable to successfully feign impairments on the SRT test because of the precise control of SRT latencies that would be required. Experiment 3 investigated 26 patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) tested more than 1 year post-injury. The 22 patients with mild TBI showed insignificantly faster SRTs than controls, but a small group of four patients with severe TBI showed slowed SRTs. Simple visual reaction time is a reliable measure of processing speed that is sensitive to the effects of malingering and TBI. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4637414/ /pubmed/26617505 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00540 Text en Copyright © 2015 Woods, Wyma, Yund and Herron. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution and reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Woods, David L.
Wyma, John M.
Yund, E. William
Herron, Timothy J.
The Effects of Repeated Testing, Simulated Malingering, and Traumatic Brain Injury on High-Precision Measures of Simple Visual Reaction Time
title The Effects of Repeated Testing, Simulated Malingering, and Traumatic Brain Injury on High-Precision Measures of Simple Visual Reaction Time
title_full The Effects of Repeated Testing, Simulated Malingering, and Traumatic Brain Injury on High-Precision Measures of Simple Visual Reaction Time
title_fullStr The Effects of Repeated Testing, Simulated Malingering, and Traumatic Brain Injury on High-Precision Measures of Simple Visual Reaction Time
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Repeated Testing, Simulated Malingering, and Traumatic Brain Injury on High-Precision Measures of Simple Visual Reaction Time
title_short The Effects of Repeated Testing, Simulated Malingering, and Traumatic Brain Injury on High-Precision Measures of Simple Visual Reaction Time
title_sort effects of repeated testing, simulated malingering, and traumatic brain injury on high-precision measures of simple visual reaction time
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4637414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26617505
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00540
work_keys_str_mv AT woodsdavidl theeffectsofrepeatedtestingsimulatedmalingeringandtraumaticbraininjuryonhighprecisionmeasuresofsimplevisualreactiontime
AT wymajohnm theeffectsofrepeatedtestingsimulatedmalingeringandtraumaticbraininjuryonhighprecisionmeasuresofsimplevisualreactiontime
AT yundewilliam theeffectsofrepeatedtestingsimulatedmalingeringandtraumaticbraininjuryonhighprecisionmeasuresofsimplevisualreactiontime
AT herrontimothyj theeffectsofrepeatedtestingsimulatedmalingeringandtraumaticbraininjuryonhighprecisionmeasuresofsimplevisualreactiontime
AT woodsdavidl effectsofrepeatedtestingsimulatedmalingeringandtraumaticbraininjuryonhighprecisionmeasuresofsimplevisualreactiontime
AT wymajohnm effectsofrepeatedtestingsimulatedmalingeringandtraumaticbraininjuryonhighprecisionmeasuresofsimplevisualreactiontime
AT yundewilliam effectsofrepeatedtestingsimulatedmalingeringandtraumaticbraininjuryonhighprecisionmeasuresofsimplevisualreactiontime
AT herrontimothyj effectsofrepeatedtestingsimulatedmalingeringandtraumaticbraininjuryonhighprecisionmeasuresofsimplevisualreactiontime