Cargando…

D-dimer testing for safe exclusion and risk stratification in patients with acute pulmonary embolism in primary care

BACKGROUND: Safe exclusion and risk stratification are currently recommended for the initial management of patients with acute pulmonary embolism (APE). The aim of this study was to assess the safe exclusion and risk stratification value of D-dimer (DD) for APE when tested at the beginning of admiss...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yin, Zhou, Chen, Yiyi, Xie, Qiong, Shao, Zhexin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4638070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26622257
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-1995.166217
_version_ 1782399872771555328
author Yin, Zhou
Chen, Yiyi
Xie, Qiong
Shao, Zhexin
author_facet Yin, Zhou
Chen, Yiyi
Xie, Qiong
Shao, Zhexin
author_sort Yin, Zhou
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Safe exclusion and risk stratification are currently recommended for the initial management of patients with acute pulmonary embolism (APE). The aim of this study was to assess the safe exclusion and risk stratification value of D-dimer (DD) for APE when tested at the beginning of admission. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive Chinese APE patients and controls were recruited from January 2010 to December 2012. All measurements of serum indexes were made in duplicate and blinded to the patients’ status. All the 40 patients with the first episode of APE were confirmed by multi-detector computed tomographic pulmonary angiography. The plasma prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time, thrombin time, fibrinogen, and DD levels were measured within 24 h of admission. We used the Mann-Whitney U-test to determine the differences between groups and drew receiver operator characteristic curve to evaluate the indexes’ value in the APE screening. RESULTS: The PT and DD in the APE group were significantly higher than those in the disease control group (P < 0.05). Taking PT and DD as the useful screening tests for APE and AUC was 0.765 and 0.822, respectively. DD yielded the higher screening efficiency, with DD >1820 μg/L as cut-off value, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value was 82.5%, 75.2%, 56.9%, and 91.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The patients with APE showed significant higher DD levels compared with disease controls, suggesting a negative qualitative DD test result can safely and efficiently exclude APE in primary care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4638070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46380702015-11-30 D-dimer testing for safe exclusion and risk stratification in patients with acute pulmonary embolism in primary care Yin, Zhou Chen, Yiyi Xie, Qiong Shao, Zhexin J Res Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Safe exclusion and risk stratification are currently recommended for the initial management of patients with acute pulmonary embolism (APE). The aim of this study was to assess the safe exclusion and risk stratification value of D-dimer (DD) for APE when tested at the beginning of admission. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive Chinese APE patients and controls were recruited from January 2010 to December 2012. All measurements of serum indexes were made in duplicate and blinded to the patients’ status. All the 40 patients with the first episode of APE were confirmed by multi-detector computed tomographic pulmonary angiography. The plasma prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time, thrombin time, fibrinogen, and DD levels were measured within 24 h of admission. We used the Mann-Whitney U-test to determine the differences between groups and drew receiver operator characteristic curve to evaluate the indexes’ value in the APE screening. RESULTS: The PT and DD in the APE group were significantly higher than those in the disease control group (P < 0.05). Taking PT and DD as the useful screening tests for APE and AUC was 0.765 and 0.822, respectively. DD yielded the higher screening efficiency, with DD >1820 μg/L as cut-off value, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value was 82.5%, 75.2%, 56.9%, and 91.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The patients with APE showed significant higher DD levels compared with disease controls, suggesting a negative qualitative DD test result can safely and efficiently exclude APE in primary care. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4638070/ /pubmed/26622257 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-1995.166217 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Journal of Research in Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yin, Zhou
Chen, Yiyi
Xie, Qiong
Shao, Zhexin
D-dimer testing for safe exclusion and risk stratification in patients with acute pulmonary embolism in primary care
title D-dimer testing for safe exclusion and risk stratification in patients with acute pulmonary embolism in primary care
title_full D-dimer testing for safe exclusion and risk stratification in patients with acute pulmonary embolism in primary care
title_fullStr D-dimer testing for safe exclusion and risk stratification in patients with acute pulmonary embolism in primary care
title_full_unstemmed D-dimer testing for safe exclusion and risk stratification in patients with acute pulmonary embolism in primary care
title_short D-dimer testing for safe exclusion and risk stratification in patients with acute pulmonary embolism in primary care
title_sort d-dimer testing for safe exclusion and risk stratification in patients with acute pulmonary embolism in primary care
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4638070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26622257
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-1995.166217
work_keys_str_mv AT yinzhou ddimertestingforsafeexclusionandriskstratificationinpatientswithacutepulmonaryembolisminprimarycare
AT chenyiyi ddimertestingforsafeexclusionandriskstratificationinpatientswithacutepulmonaryembolisminprimarycare
AT xieqiong ddimertestingforsafeexclusionandriskstratificationinpatientswithacutepulmonaryembolisminprimarycare
AT shaozhexin ddimertestingforsafeexclusionandriskstratificationinpatientswithacutepulmonaryembolisminprimarycare