Cargando…

Results in Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis: A Ten-Year Experience

Background/Aims. Peritoneal dialysis is a successful renal replacement therapy (RRT) for old and dependent patients. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of an assisted peritoneal dialysis (aPD) program developed in a Portuguese center. Methods. Retrospective study based on 200 adult incident patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Querido, Sara, Branco, Patrícia Quadros, Costa, Elisabete, Pereira, Sara, Gaspar, Maria Augusta, Barata, José Diogo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4639672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26600950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/712539
_version_ 1782399962359791616
author Querido, Sara
Branco, Patrícia Quadros
Costa, Elisabete
Pereira, Sara
Gaspar, Maria Augusta
Barata, José Diogo
author_facet Querido, Sara
Branco, Patrícia Quadros
Costa, Elisabete
Pereira, Sara
Gaspar, Maria Augusta
Barata, José Diogo
author_sort Querido, Sara
collection PubMed
description Background/Aims. Peritoneal dialysis is a successful renal replacement therapy (RRT) for old and dependent patients. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of an assisted peritoneal dialysis (aPD) program developed in a Portuguese center. Methods. Retrospective study based on 200 adult incident patients admitted during ten years to a PD program. We included all 17 patients who were under aPD and analysed various parameters, including complications with the technique, hospitalizations, and patient and technique survival. Results. The global peritonitis rate was lower in helped than in nonhelped patients: 0.4 versus 0.59 episodes/patient/year. The global hospitalization rate was higher in helped than in nonhelped patients: 0.67 versus 0.45 episodes/patient/year (p = NS). Technique survival in helped patients versus nonhelped patients was 92.3%, 92.3%, 83.1%, and 72.7% versus 91.9%, 81.7%, and 72.1%, and 68.3%, at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively (p = NS), and patient survival in helped patients versus nonhelped patients was 93.3%, 93.3%, 93.3%, and 74.7% versus 95.9% 93.7%, 89%, and 82% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively (p = NS). Conclusions. aPD offers an opportune, reliable, and effective home care alternative for patients with no other RRT options.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4639672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46396722015-11-23 Results in Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis: A Ten-Year Experience Querido, Sara Branco, Patrícia Quadros Costa, Elisabete Pereira, Sara Gaspar, Maria Augusta Barata, José Diogo Int J Nephrol Clinical Study Background/Aims. Peritoneal dialysis is a successful renal replacement therapy (RRT) for old and dependent patients. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of an assisted peritoneal dialysis (aPD) program developed in a Portuguese center. Methods. Retrospective study based on 200 adult incident patients admitted during ten years to a PD program. We included all 17 patients who were under aPD and analysed various parameters, including complications with the technique, hospitalizations, and patient and technique survival. Results. The global peritonitis rate was lower in helped than in nonhelped patients: 0.4 versus 0.59 episodes/patient/year. The global hospitalization rate was higher in helped than in nonhelped patients: 0.67 versus 0.45 episodes/patient/year (p = NS). Technique survival in helped patients versus nonhelped patients was 92.3%, 92.3%, 83.1%, and 72.7% versus 91.9%, 81.7%, and 72.1%, and 68.3%, at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively (p = NS), and patient survival in helped patients versus nonhelped patients was 93.3%, 93.3%, 93.3%, and 74.7% versus 95.9% 93.7%, 89%, and 82% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively (p = NS). Conclusions. aPD offers an opportune, reliable, and effective home care alternative for patients with no other RRT options. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4639672/ /pubmed/26600950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/712539 Text en Copyright © 2015 Sara Querido et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Querido, Sara
Branco, Patrícia Quadros
Costa, Elisabete
Pereira, Sara
Gaspar, Maria Augusta
Barata, José Diogo
Results in Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis: A Ten-Year Experience
title Results in Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis: A Ten-Year Experience
title_full Results in Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis: A Ten-Year Experience
title_fullStr Results in Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis: A Ten-Year Experience
title_full_unstemmed Results in Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis: A Ten-Year Experience
title_short Results in Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis: A Ten-Year Experience
title_sort results in assisted peritoneal dialysis: a ten-year experience
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4639672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26600950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/712539
work_keys_str_mv AT queridosara resultsinassistedperitonealdialysisatenyearexperience
AT brancopatriciaquadros resultsinassistedperitonealdialysisatenyearexperience
AT costaelisabete resultsinassistedperitonealdialysisatenyearexperience
AT pereirasara resultsinassistedperitonealdialysisatenyearexperience
AT gasparmariaaugusta resultsinassistedperitonealdialysisatenyearexperience
AT baratajosediogo resultsinassistedperitonealdialysisatenyearexperience