Cargando…
Immuno-analysis of microparticles: probing at the limits of detection
Microparticle (MP) research is clouded by debate regarding the accuracy and validity of flow cytometry (FCM) as an analytical methodology, as it is influenced by many variables including the pre-analytical conditions, instruments physical capabilities and detection parameters. This study utilises a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4639787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26553743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16314 |
_version_ | 1782399984761569280 |
---|---|
author | Latham, Sharissa L. Tiberti, Natalia Gokoolparsadh, Naveena Holdaway, Karen Olivier Couraud, Pierre Grau, Georges E. R. Combes, Valery |
author_facet | Latham, Sharissa L. Tiberti, Natalia Gokoolparsadh, Naveena Holdaway, Karen Olivier Couraud, Pierre Grau, Georges E. R. Combes, Valery |
author_sort | Latham, Sharissa L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Microparticle (MP) research is clouded by debate regarding the accuracy and validity of flow cytometry (FCM) as an analytical methodology, as it is influenced by many variables including the pre-analytical conditions, instruments physical capabilities and detection parameters. This study utilises a simplistic in vitro system for generating MP, and through comparative analysis with immuno-electron microscopy (Immuno-EM) assesses the strengths and limitations of probe selection and high-sensitivity FCM. Of the markers examined, MP were most specifically labelled with phosphatidylserine ligands, annexin V and lactadherin, although only ~60% MP are PS positive. Whilst these two ligands detect comparable absolute MP numbers, they interact with the same population in distinct manners; annexin V binding is enhanced on TNF induced MP. CD105 and CD54 expression were, as expected, consistent and enhanced following TNF activation respectively. Their labelling however accounted for as few as 30–40% of MP. The greatest discrepancies between FCM and I-EM were observed in the population solely labelled for the surface antigen. These findings demonstrate that despite significant improvements in resolution, high-sensitivity FCM remains limited in detecting small-size MP expressing low antigen levels. This study highlights factors to consider when selecting endothelial MP probes, as well as interpreting and representing data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4639787 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46397872015-11-16 Immuno-analysis of microparticles: probing at the limits of detection Latham, Sharissa L. Tiberti, Natalia Gokoolparsadh, Naveena Holdaway, Karen Olivier Couraud, Pierre Grau, Georges E. R. Combes, Valery Sci Rep Article Microparticle (MP) research is clouded by debate regarding the accuracy and validity of flow cytometry (FCM) as an analytical methodology, as it is influenced by many variables including the pre-analytical conditions, instruments physical capabilities and detection parameters. This study utilises a simplistic in vitro system for generating MP, and through comparative analysis with immuno-electron microscopy (Immuno-EM) assesses the strengths and limitations of probe selection and high-sensitivity FCM. Of the markers examined, MP were most specifically labelled with phosphatidylserine ligands, annexin V and lactadherin, although only ~60% MP are PS positive. Whilst these two ligands detect comparable absolute MP numbers, they interact with the same population in distinct manners; annexin V binding is enhanced on TNF induced MP. CD105 and CD54 expression were, as expected, consistent and enhanced following TNF activation respectively. Their labelling however accounted for as few as 30–40% of MP. The greatest discrepancies between FCM and I-EM were observed in the population solely labelled for the surface antigen. These findings demonstrate that despite significant improvements in resolution, high-sensitivity FCM remains limited in detecting small-size MP expressing low antigen levels. This study highlights factors to consider when selecting endothelial MP probes, as well as interpreting and representing data. Nature Publishing Group 2015-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4639787/ /pubmed/26553743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16314 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Latham, Sharissa L. Tiberti, Natalia Gokoolparsadh, Naveena Holdaway, Karen Olivier Couraud, Pierre Grau, Georges E. R. Combes, Valery Immuno-analysis of microparticles: probing at the limits of detection |
title | Immuno-analysis of microparticles: probing at the limits of detection |
title_full | Immuno-analysis of microparticles: probing at the limits of detection |
title_fullStr | Immuno-analysis of microparticles: probing at the limits of detection |
title_full_unstemmed | Immuno-analysis of microparticles: probing at the limits of detection |
title_short | Immuno-analysis of microparticles: probing at the limits of detection |
title_sort | immuno-analysis of microparticles: probing at the limits of detection |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4639787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26553743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16314 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lathamsharissal immunoanalysisofmicroparticlesprobingatthelimitsofdetection AT tibertinatalia immunoanalysisofmicroparticlesprobingatthelimitsofdetection AT gokoolparsadhnaveena immunoanalysisofmicroparticlesprobingatthelimitsofdetection AT holdawaykaren immunoanalysisofmicroparticlesprobingatthelimitsofdetection AT oliviercouraudpierre immunoanalysisofmicroparticlesprobingatthelimitsofdetection AT graugeorgeser immunoanalysisofmicroparticlesprobingatthelimitsofdetection AT combesvalery immunoanalysisofmicroparticlesprobingatthelimitsofdetection |