Cargando…

Immuno-analysis of microparticles: probing at the limits of detection

Microparticle (MP) research is clouded by debate regarding the accuracy and validity of flow cytometry (FCM) as an analytical methodology, as it is influenced by many variables including the pre-analytical conditions, instruments physical capabilities and detection parameters. This study utilises a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Latham, Sharissa L., Tiberti, Natalia, Gokoolparsadh, Naveena, Holdaway, Karen, Olivier Couraud, Pierre, Grau, Georges E. R., Combes, Valery
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4639787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26553743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16314
_version_ 1782399984761569280
author Latham, Sharissa L.
Tiberti, Natalia
Gokoolparsadh, Naveena
Holdaway, Karen
Olivier Couraud, Pierre
Grau, Georges E. R.
Combes, Valery
author_facet Latham, Sharissa L.
Tiberti, Natalia
Gokoolparsadh, Naveena
Holdaway, Karen
Olivier Couraud, Pierre
Grau, Georges E. R.
Combes, Valery
author_sort Latham, Sharissa L.
collection PubMed
description Microparticle (MP) research is clouded by debate regarding the accuracy and validity of flow cytometry (FCM) as an analytical methodology, as it is influenced by many variables including the pre-analytical conditions, instruments physical capabilities and detection parameters. This study utilises a simplistic in vitro system for generating MP, and through comparative analysis with immuno-electron microscopy (Immuno-EM) assesses the strengths and limitations of probe selection and high-sensitivity FCM. Of the markers examined, MP were most specifically labelled with phosphatidylserine ligands, annexin V and lactadherin, although only ~60% MP are PS positive. Whilst these two ligands detect comparable absolute MP numbers, they interact with the same population in distinct manners; annexin V binding is enhanced on TNF induced MP. CD105 and CD54 expression were, as expected, consistent and enhanced following TNF activation respectively. Their labelling however accounted for as few as 30–40% of MP. The greatest discrepancies between FCM and I-EM were observed in the population solely labelled for the surface antigen. These findings demonstrate that despite significant improvements in resolution, high-sensitivity FCM remains limited in detecting small-size MP expressing low antigen levels. This study highlights factors to consider when selecting endothelial MP probes, as well as interpreting and representing data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4639787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46397872015-11-16 Immuno-analysis of microparticles: probing at the limits of detection Latham, Sharissa L. Tiberti, Natalia Gokoolparsadh, Naveena Holdaway, Karen Olivier Couraud, Pierre Grau, Georges E. R. Combes, Valery Sci Rep Article Microparticle (MP) research is clouded by debate regarding the accuracy and validity of flow cytometry (FCM) as an analytical methodology, as it is influenced by many variables including the pre-analytical conditions, instruments physical capabilities and detection parameters. This study utilises a simplistic in vitro system for generating MP, and through comparative analysis with immuno-electron microscopy (Immuno-EM) assesses the strengths and limitations of probe selection and high-sensitivity FCM. Of the markers examined, MP were most specifically labelled with phosphatidylserine ligands, annexin V and lactadherin, although only ~60% MP are PS positive. Whilst these two ligands detect comparable absolute MP numbers, they interact with the same population in distinct manners; annexin V binding is enhanced on TNF induced MP. CD105 and CD54 expression were, as expected, consistent and enhanced following TNF activation respectively. Their labelling however accounted for as few as 30–40% of MP. The greatest discrepancies between FCM and I-EM were observed in the population solely labelled for the surface antigen. These findings demonstrate that despite significant improvements in resolution, high-sensitivity FCM remains limited in detecting small-size MP expressing low antigen levels. This study highlights factors to consider when selecting endothelial MP probes, as well as interpreting and representing data. Nature Publishing Group 2015-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4639787/ /pubmed/26553743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16314 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Latham, Sharissa L.
Tiberti, Natalia
Gokoolparsadh, Naveena
Holdaway, Karen
Olivier Couraud, Pierre
Grau, Georges E. R.
Combes, Valery
Immuno-analysis of microparticles: probing at the limits of detection
title Immuno-analysis of microparticles: probing at the limits of detection
title_full Immuno-analysis of microparticles: probing at the limits of detection
title_fullStr Immuno-analysis of microparticles: probing at the limits of detection
title_full_unstemmed Immuno-analysis of microparticles: probing at the limits of detection
title_short Immuno-analysis of microparticles: probing at the limits of detection
title_sort immuno-analysis of microparticles: probing at the limits of detection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4639787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26553743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16314
work_keys_str_mv AT lathamsharissal immunoanalysisofmicroparticlesprobingatthelimitsofdetection
AT tibertinatalia immunoanalysisofmicroparticlesprobingatthelimitsofdetection
AT gokoolparsadhnaveena immunoanalysisofmicroparticlesprobingatthelimitsofdetection
AT holdawaykaren immunoanalysisofmicroparticlesprobingatthelimitsofdetection
AT oliviercouraudpierre immunoanalysisofmicroparticlesprobingatthelimitsofdetection
AT graugeorgeser immunoanalysisofmicroparticlesprobingatthelimitsofdetection
AT combesvalery immunoanalysisofmicroparticlesprobingatthelimitsofdetection