Cargando…

Biomechanical evaluation of inferior scapula notching of reverse shoulder arthroplasty depending on implant configuration and scapula neck anatomy

PURPOSE: The presence of inferior scapula notching is significantly affected by the anatomy the scapula and can be influenced by the glenosphere design and position and the onlay type. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A biomechanical study was undertaken with 13 human shoulder specimens in a robot-assisted sh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Tomas, Bäunker, Alexandra, Krämer, Manuel, Hurschler, Christof, Kaufmann, Melena, Pastor, Marc Frederic, Wellmann, Mathias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4639998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26622125
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.167932
_version_ 1782400013842776064
author Smith, Tomas
Bäunker, Alexandra
Krämer, Manuel
Hurschler, Christof
Kaufmann, Melena
Pastor, Marc Frederic
Wellmann, Mathias
author_facet Smith, Tomas
Bäunker, Alexandra
Krämer, Manuel
Hurschler, Christof
Kaufmann, Melena
Pastor, Marc Frederic
Wellmann, Mathias
author_sort Smith, Tomas
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The presence of inferior scapula notching is significantly affected by the anatomy the scapula and can be influenced by the glenosphere design and position and the onlay type. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A biomechanical study was undertaken with 13 human shoulder specimens in a robot-assisted shoulder simulator. Inferior scapula contact during adduction of the humerus was detected using a contact pressure film. Computed tomography scans with three-dimensional reconstructions of each specimen were performed. RESULTS: The greatest improvement of the scapula notching angle (SNA) was achieved by simultaneous implantation of a shallow humeral onlay and an eccentric glenosphere design: 16.3-19.0° (P < 0.005). The SNA was significantly decreased by 5.8° when shifting from a 38 mm centric glenosphere to a 42 mm centric glenosphere (P < 0.005) and by 8.9° comparing the 38 mm centric glenosphere with 38 mm eccentric glenosphere (P < 0.005). The solitary implantation of a shallow onlay significantly decreased the SNA depending on the glenosphere size between 7.4° and 8.0° (P = 0.001). A more inferior position of the metaglene as well as a long scapula neck (P = 0.029) and a large lateral scapula pillar angle (P = 0.033) were correlated with a lower SNA. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the importance of inferior glenosphere placement and the benefit of eccentric glenosphere and shallow humeral cup design to reduce the adduction deficit of the reverse shoulder. The presence of a short neck of the scapula can have a negative prognostic effect on inferior impingement during adduction of the arm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic Science Study
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4639998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46399982015-11-30 Biomechanical evaluation of inferior scapula notching of reverse shoulder arthroplasty depending on implant configuration and scapula neck anatomy Smith, Tomas Bäunker, Alexandra Krämer, Manuel Hurschler, Christof Kaufmann, Melena Pastor, Marc Frederic Wellmann, Mathias Int J Shoulder Surg Original Article PURPOSE: The presence of inferior scapula notching is significantly affected by the anatomy the scapula and can be influenced by the glenosphere design and position and the onlay type. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A biomechanical study was undertaken with 13 human shoulder specimens in a robot-assisted shoulder simulator. Inferior scapula contact during adduction of the humerus was detected using a contact pressure film. Computed tomography scans with three-dimensional reconstructions of each specimen were performed. RESULTS: The greatest improvement of the scapula notching angle (SNA) was achieved by simultaneous implantation of a shallow humeral onlay and an eccentric glenosphere design: 16.3-19.0° (P < 0.005). The SNA was significantly decreased by 5.8° when shifting from a 38 mm centric glenosphere to a 42 mm centric glenosphere (P < 0.005) and by 8.9° comparing the 38 mm centric glenosphere with 38 mm eccentric glenosphere (P < 0.005). The solitary implantation of a shallow onlay significantly decreased the SNA depending on the glenosphere size between 7.4° and 8.0° (P = 0.001). A more inferior position of the metaglene as well as a long scapula neck (P = 0.029) and a large lateral scapula pillar angle (P = 0.033) were correlated with a lower SNA. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the importance of inferior glenosphere placement and the benefit of eccentric glenosphere and shallow humeral cup design to reduce the adduction deficit of the reverse shoulder. The presence of a short neck of the scapula can have a negative prognostic effect on inferior impingement during adduction of the arm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic Science Study Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4639998/ /pubmed/26622125 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.167932 Text en Copyright: © International Journal of Shoulder Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Smith, Tomas
Bäunker, Alexandra
Krämer, Manuel
Hurschler, Christof
Kaufmann, Melena
Pastor, Marc Frederic
Wellmann, Mathias
Biomechanical evaluation of inferior scapula notching of reverse shoulder arthroplasty depending on implant configuration and scapula neck anatomy
title Biomechanical evaluation of inferior scapula notching of reverse shoulder arthroplasty depending on implant configuration and scapula neck anatomy
title_full Biomechanical evaluation of inferior scapula notching of reverse shoulder arthroplasty depending on implant configuration and scapula neck anatomy
title_fullStr Biomechanical evaluation of inferior scapula notching of reverse shoulder arthroplasty depending on implant configuration and scapula neck anatomy
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical evaluation of inferior scapula notching of reverse shoulder arthroplasty depending on implant configuration and scapula neck anatomy
title_short Biomechanical evaluation of inferior scapula notching of reverse shoulder arthroplasty depending on implant configuration and scapula neck anatomy
title_sort biomechanical evaluation of inferior scapula notching of reverse shoulder arthroplasty depending on implant configuration and scapula neck anatomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4639998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26622125
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.167932
work_keys_str_mv AT smithtomas biomechanicalevaluationofinferiorscapulanotchingofreverseshoulderarthroplastydependingonimplantconfigurationandscapulaneckanatomy
AT baunkeralexandra biomechanicalevaluationofinferiorscapulanotchingofreverseshoulderarthroplastydependingonimplantconfigurationandscapulaneckanatomy
AT kramermanuel biomechanicalevaluationofinferiorscapulanotchingofreverseshoulderarthroplastydependingonimplantconfigurationandscapulaneckanatomy
AT hurschlerchristof biomechanicalevaluationofinferiorscapulanotchingofreverseshoulderarthroplastydependingonimplantconfigurationandscapulaneckanatomy
AT kaufmannmelena biomechanicalevaluationofinferiorscapulanotchingofreverseshoulderarthroplastydependingonimplantconfigurationandscapulaneckanatomy
AT pastormarcfrederic biomechanicalevaluationofinferiorscapulanotchingofreverseshoulderarthroplastydependingonimplantconfigurationandscapulaneckanatomy
AT wellmannmathias biomechanicalevaluationofinferiorscapulanotchingofreverseshoulderarthroplastydependingonimplantconfigurationandscapulaneckanatomy