Cargando…
A systematic review of instruments for measuring outcomes in economic evaluation within aged care
BACKGROUND: This paper describes the methods and results of a systematic review to identify instruments used to measure quality of life outcomes in older people. The primary focus of the review was to identify instruments suitable for application with older people within economic evaluations conduct...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4640110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26553129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0372-8 |
_version_ | 1782400035781083136 |
---|---|
author | Bulamu, Norma B. Kaambwa, Billingsley Ratcliffe, Julie |
author_facet | Bulamu, Norma B. Kaambwa, Billingsley Ratcliffe, Julie |
author_sort | Bulamu, Norma B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This paper describes the methods and results of a systematic review to identify instruments used to measure quality of life outcomes in older people. The primary focus of the review was to identify instruments suitable for application with older people within economic evaluations conducted in the aged care sector. METHODS: Online databases searched were PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Embase and Informit. Studies that met the following criteria were included: 1) study population exclusively above 65 years of age 2) measured health status, health related quality of life or quality of life outcomes more broadly through use of an instrument developed for this purpose, 3) used a generic preference based instrument or an older person specific preference based or non-preference based instrument or both, and 4) published in journals in the English language after 2000. RESULTS: The most commonly applied generic preference based instrument in both the community and residential aged care context was the EuroQol - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), followed by the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) and the Health Utilities Index (HUI2/3). The most widely applied older person specific instrument was the ICEpop CAPability measure for Older people (ICECAP-O) in both community and residential aged care. CONCLUSION: In the absence of an ideal instrument for incorporating into economic evaluations in the aged care sector, this review recommends the use of a generic preference based measure of health related quality of life such as the EQ-5D to obtain quality adjusted life years, in combination with an instrument that has a broader quality of life focus like the ASCOT, which was designed specifically for evaluating interventions in social care or the ICECAP-O, a capability measure for older people. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12955-015-0372-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4640110 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46401102015-11-11 A systematic review of instruments for measuring outcomes in economic evaluation within aged care Bulamu, Norma B. Kaambwa, Billingsley Ratcliffe, Julie Health Qual Life Outcomes Review BACKGROUND: This paper describes the methods and results of a systematic review to identify instruments used to measure quality of life outcomes in older people. The primary focus of the review was to identify instruments suitable for application with older people within economic evaluations conducted in the aged care sector. METHODS: Online databases searched were PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Embase and Informit. Studies that met the following criteria were included: 1) study population exclusively above 65 years of age 2) measured health status, health related quality of life or quality of life outcomes more broadly through use of an instrument developed for this purpose, 3) used a generic preference based instrument or an older person specific preference based or non-preference based instrument or both, and 4) published in journals in the English language after 2000. RESULTS: The most commonly applied generic preference based instrument in both the community and residential aged care context was the EuroQol - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), followed by the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) and the Health Utilities Index (HUI2/3). The most widely applied older person specific instrument was the ICEpop CAPability measure for Older people (ICECAP-O) in both community and residential aged care. CONCLUSION: In the absence of an ideal instrument for incorporating into economic evaluations in the aged care sector, this review recommends the use of a generic preference based measure of health related quality of life such as the EQ-5D to obtain quality adjusted life years, in combination with an instrument that has a broader quality of life focus like the ASCOT, which was designed specifically for evaluating interventions in social care or the ICECAP-O, a capability measure for older people. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12955-015-0372-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4640110/ /pubmed/26553129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0372-8 Text en © Bulamu et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Bulamu, Norma B. Kaambwa, Billingsley Ratcliffe, Julie A systematic review of instruments for measuring outcomes in economic evaluation within aged care |
title | A systematic review of instruments for measuring outcomes in economic evaluation within aged care |
title_full | A systematic review of instruments for measuring outcomes in economic evaluation within aged care |
title_fullStr | A systematic review of instruments for measuring outcomes in economic evaluation within aged care |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review of instruments for measuring outcomes in economic evaluation within aged care |
title_short | A systematic review of instruments for measuring outcomes in economic evaluation within aged care |
title_sort | systematic review of instruments for measuring outcomes in economic evaluation within aged care |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4640110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26553129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0372-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bulamunormab asystematicreviewofinstrumentsformeasuringoutcomesineconomicevaluationwithinagedcare AT kaambwabillingsley asystematicreviewofinstrumentsformeasuringoutcomesineconomicevaluationwithinagedcare AT ratcliffejulie asystematicreviewofinstrumentsformeasuringoutcomesineconomicevaluationwithinagedcare AT bulamunormab systematicreviewofinstrumentsformeasuringoutcomesineconomicevaluationwithinagedcare AT kaambwabillingsley systematicreviewofinstrumentsformeasuringoutcomesineconomicevaluationwithinagedcare AT ratcliffejulie systematicreviewofinstrumentsformeasuringoutcomesineconomicevaluationwithinagedcare |