Cargando…

The contributions of the European Medicines Agency and its pediatric committee to the fight against childhood leukemia

BACKGROUND: Although the diagnosis of childhood leukemia is no longer a death sentence, too many patients still die, more with acute myeloid leukemia than with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The European Union pediatric legislation was introduced to improve pharmaceutical treatment of children, but s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rose, Klaus, Walson, Philip D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4640230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26604845
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S63029
_version_ 1782400051785498624
author Rose, Klaus
Walson, Philip D
author_facet Rose, Klaus
Walson, Philip D
author_sort Rose, Klaus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although the diagnosis of childhood leukemia is no longer a death sentence, too many patients still die, more with acute myeloid leukemia than with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The European Union pediatric legislation was introduced to improve pharmaceutical treatment of children, but some question whether the European Medicines Agency (EMA) approach is helping children with leukemia. Some have even suggested that the decisions of EMA pediatric committee (PDCO) are counterproductive. This study was designed to investigate the impact of PDCO-issued pediatric investigation plans (PIPs) for leukemia drugs. METHODS: All PIPs listed under “oncology” were downloaded from the EMA website. Non-leukemia decisions including misclassifications, waivers (no PIP), and solid tumors were discarded. The leukemia decisions were analyzed, compared to pediatric leukemia trials in the database http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, and discussed in the light of current literature. RESULTS: The PDCO leukemia decisions demand clinical trials in pediatric leukemia for all new adult drugs without prioritization. However, because leukemia in children is different and much rarer than in adults, these decisions have resulted in proposed studies that are scientifically and ethically questionable. They are also unnecessary, since once promising new compounds are approved for adults, more appropriate, prioritized pediatric leukemia trials are initiated worldwide without PDCO involvement. CONCLUSION: EMA/PDCO leukemia PIPs do little to advance the treatment of childhood leukemia. The unintended negative effects of the flawed EMA/PDCO’s standardized requesting of non-prioritized testing of every new adult leukemia drug in children with relapsed or refractory disease expose these children to questionable trials, and could undermine public trust in pediatric clinical research. Institutions, investigators, and ethics committees/institutional review boards need to be skeptical of trials triggered by PDCO. New, better ways to facilitate drug development for pediatric leukemia are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4640230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46402302015-11-24 The contributions of the European Medicines Agency and its pediatric committee to the fight against childhood leukemia Rose, Klaus Walson, Philip D Risk Manag Healthc Policy Review BACKGROUND: Although the diagnosis of childhood leukemia is no longer a death sentence, too many patients still die, more with acute myeloid leukemia than with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The European Union pediatric legislation was introduced to improve pharmaceutical treatment of children, but some question whether the European Medicines Agency (EMA) approach is helping children with leukemia. Some have even suggested that the decisions of EMA pediatric committee (PDCO) are counterproductive. This study was designed to investigate the impact of PDCO-issued pediatric investigation plans (PIPs) for leukemia drugs. METHODS: All PIPs listed under “oncology” were downloaded from the EMA website. Non-leukemia decisions including misclassifications, waivers (no PIP), and solid tumors were discarded. The leukemia decisions were analyzed, compared to pediatric leukemia trials in the database http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, and discussed in the light of current literature. RESULTS: The PDCO leukemia decisions demand clinical trials in pediatric leukemia for all new adult drugs without prioritization. However, because leukemia in children is different and much rarer than in adults, these decisions have resulted in proposed studies that are scientifically and ethically questionable. They are also unnecessary, since once promising new compounds are approved for adults, more appropriate, prioritized pediatric leukemia trials are initiated worldwide without PDCO involvement. CONCLUSION: EMA/PDCO leukemia PIPs do little to advance the treatment of childhood leukemia. The unintended negative effects of the flawed EMA/PDCO’s standardized requesting of non-prioritized testing of every new adult leukemia drug in children with relapsed or refractory disease expose these children to questionable trials, and could undermine public trust in pediatric clinical research. Institutions, investigators, and ethics committees/institutional review boards need to be skeptical of trials triggered by PDCO. New, better ways to facilitate drug development for pediatric leukemia are needed. Dove Medical Press 2015-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4640230/ /pubmed/26604845 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S63029 Text en © 2015 Rose and Walson. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Rose, Klaus
Walson, Philip D
The contributions of the European Medicines Agency and its pediatric committee to the fight against childhood leukemia
title The contributions of the European Medicines Agency and its pediatric committee to the fight against childhood leukemia
title_full The contributions of the European Medicines Agency and its pediatric committee to the fight against childhood leukemia
title_fullStr The contributions of the European Medicines Agency and its pediatric committee to the fight against childhood leukemia
title_full_unstemmed The contributions of the European Medicines Agency and its pediatric committee to the fight against childhood leukemia
title_short The contributions of the European Medicines Agency and its pediatric committee to the fight against childhood leukemia
title_sort contributions of the european medicines agency and its pediatric committee to the fight against childhood leukemia
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4640230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26604845
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S63029
work_keys_str_mv AT roseklaus thecontributionsoftheeuropeanmedicinesagencyanditspediatriccommitteetothefightagainstchildhoodleukemia
AT walsonphilipd thecontributionsoftheeuropeanmedicinesagencyanditspediatriccommitteetothefightagainstchildhoodleukemia
AT roseklaus contributionsoftheeuropeanmedicinesagencyanditspediatriccommitteetothefightagainstchildhoodleukemia
AT walsonphilipd contributionsoftheeuropeanmedicinesagencyanditspediatriccommitteetothefightagainstchildhoodleukemia