Cargando…

Impact of a decision aid on reducing uncertainty: pilot study of women in their 40s and screening mammography

BACKGROUND: In 2009 the United States Preventive Services Task Force updated its breast cancer screening guidelines to recommend that average-risk women obtain a screening mammogram every two years starting at age 50 instead of annually starting at age 40. Inconsistencies in data regarding the benef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scariati, Paula, Nelson, Lisa, Watson, Lindsey, Bedrick, Stephen, Eden, Karen B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4640415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26554555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0210-2
_version_ 1782400071427424256
author Scariati, Paula
Nelson, Lisa
Watson, Lindsey
Bedrick, Stephen
Eden, Karen B.
author_facet Scariati, Paula
Nelson, Lisa
Watson, Lindsey
Bedrick, Stephen
Eden, Karen B.
author_sort Scariati, Paula
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2009 the United States Preventive Services Task Force updated its breast cancer screening guidelines to recommend that average-risk women obtain a screening mammogram every two years starting at age 50 instead of annually starting at age 40. Inconsistencies in data regarding the benefit versus risk of routine screening for women less than 50-years-of-age led to a second recommendation – that women in their forties engage in a shared decision making process with their provider to make an individualized choice about screening mammography that was right for them. In response, a web-based interactive mammography screening decision aid was developed and evaluated. METHODS: The decision aid was developed using an agile, iterative process. It was further honed based on feedback from clinical and technical subject matter experts. A convenience sample of 51 age- and risk-appropriate women was recruited to pilot the aid. Pre-post decisional conflict and screening choice was assessed. RESULTS: Women reported a significant reduction in overall decisional conflict after using the decision aid (Z = -5.3, p < 0.001). These participants also reported statistically significant reductions in each of the decisional conflict subscales: feeling uncertain (Z = -4.7, p < 0.001), feeling uninformed (Z = -5.2, p < 0.001), feeling unclear about values (Z = -5.0, p < 0.001), and feeling unsupported (Z = -4.0, p < 0.001). However, a woman’s intention to obtain a screening mammogram in the next 1-2 years was not significantly changed (Wilcoxon signed-rank Z = -1.508, p = 0.132). CONCLUSION: This mammography screening decision aid brings value to patient care not by impacting what a woman chooses but by lending clarity to why or how she chooses it. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12911-015-0210-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4640415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46404152015-11-11 Impact of a decision aid on reducing uncertainty: pilot study of women in their 40s and screening mammography Scariati, Paula Nelson, Lisa Watson, Lindsey Bedrick, Stephen Eden, Karen B. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: In 2009 the United States Preventive Services Task Force updated its breast cancer screening guidelines to recommend that average-risk women obtain a screening mammogram every two years starting at age 50 instead of annually starting at age 40. Inconsistencies in data regarding the benefit versus risk of routine screening for women less than 50-years-of-age led to a second recommendation – that women in their forties engage in a shared decision making process with their provider to make an individualized choice about screening mammography that was right for them. In response, a web-based interactive mammography screening decision aid was developed and evaluated. METHODS: The decision aid was developed using an agile, iterative process. It was further honed based on feedback from clinical and technical subject matter experts. A convenience sample of 51 age- and risk-appropriate women was recruited to pilot the aid. Pre-post decisional conflict and screening choice was assessed. RESULTS: Women reported a significant reduction in overall decisional conflict after using the decision aid (Z = -5.3, p < 0.001). These participants also reported statistically significant reductions in each of the decisional conflict subscales: feeling uncertain (Z = -4.7, p < 0.001), feeling uninformed (Z = -5.2, p < 0.001), feeling unclear about values (Z = -5.0, p < 0.001), and feeling unsupported (Z = -4.0, p < 0.001). However, a woman’s intention to obtain a screening mammogram in the next 1-2 years was not significantly changed (Wilcoxon signed-rank Z = -1.508, p = 0.132). CONCLUSION: This mammography screening decision aid brings value to patient care not by impacting what a woman chooses but by lending clarity to why or how she chooses it. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12911-015-0210-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4640415/ /pubmed/26554555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0210-2 Text en © Scariati et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Scariati, Paula
Nelson, Lisa
Watson, Lindsey
Bedrick, Stephen
Eden, Karen B.
Impact of a decision aid on reducing uncertainty: pilot study of women in their 40s and screening mammography
title Impact of a decision aid on reducing uncertainty: pilot study of women in their 40s and screening mammography
title_full Impact of a decision aid on reducing uncertainty: pilot study of women in their 40s and screening mammography
title_fullStr Impact of a decision aid on reducing uncertainty: pilot study of women in their 40s and screening mammography
title_full_unstemmed Impact of a decision aid on reducing uncertainty: pilot study of women in their 40s and screening mammography
title_short Impact of a decision aid on reducing uncertainty: pilot study of women in their 40s and screening mammography
title_sort impact of a decision aid on reducing uncertainty: pilot study of women in their 40s and screening mammography
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4640415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26554555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0210-2
work_keys_str_mv AT scariatipaula impactofadecisionaidonreducinguncertaintypilotstudyofwomenintheir40sandscreeningmammography
AT nelsonlisa impactofadecisionaidonreducinguncertaintypilotstudyofwomenintheir40sandscreeningmammography
AT watsonlindsey impactofadecisionaidonreducinguncertaintypilotstudyofwomenintheir40sandscreeningmammography
AT bedrickstephen impactofadecisionaidonreducinguncertaintypilotstudyofwomenintheir40sandscreeningmammography
AT edenkarenb impactofadecisionaidonreducinguncertaintypilotstudyofwomenintheir40sandscreeningmammography