Cargando…

Do Patients Want to Die at Home? A Systematic Review of the UK Literature, Focused on Missing Preferences for Place of Death

BACKGROUND: End-of-life care policy has a focus on enabling patients to die in their preferred place; this is believed for most to be home. This review assesses patient preferences for place of death examining: the extent of unreported preferences, the importance of patient factors (place of care an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoare, Sarah, Morris, Zoë Slote, Kelly, Michael P, Kuhn, Isla, Barclay, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4640665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26555077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142723
_version_ 1782400113561305088
author Hoare, Sarah
Morris, Zoë Slote
Kelly, Michael P
Kuhn, Isla
Barclay, Stephen
author_facet Hoare, Sarah
Morris, Zoë Slote
Kelly, Michael P
Kuhn, Isla
Barclay, Stephen
author_sort Hoare, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: End-of-life care policy has a focus on enabling patients to die in their preferred place; this is believed for most to be home. This review assesses patient preferences for place of death examining: the extent of unreported preferences, the importance of patient factors (place of care and health diagnosis) and who reports preferences. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Systematic literature review of 7 electronic databases, grey literature, backwards citations from included studies and Palliative Medicine hand search. Included studies published between 2000–2015, reporting original, quantifiable results of adult UK preferences for place of death. Of 10826 articles reviewed, 61 met the inclusion criteria. Summary charts present preferences for place of death by health diagnosis, where patients were asked and who reported the preference. These charts are recalculated to include ‘missing data,’ the views of those whose preferences were not asked, expressed or reported or absent in studies. Missing data were common. Across all health conditions when missing data were excluded the majority preference was for home: when missing data were included, it was not known what proportion of patients with cancer, non-cancer or multiple conditions preferred home. Patients, family proxies and public all expressed a majority preference for home when missing data were excluded: when included, it was not known what proportion of patients or family proxies preferred home. Where patients wished to die was related to where they were asked their preference. Missing data calculations are limited to ‘reported’ data. CONCLUSIONS: It is unknown what proportion of patients prefers to die at home or elsewhere. Reported preferences for place of death often exclude the views of those with no preference or not asked: when ‘missing data’ are included, they supress the proportion of preferences for all locations. Caution should be exercised if asserting that most patients prefer to die at home.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4640665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46406652015-11-13 Do Patients Want to Die at Home? A Systematic Review of the UK Literature, Focused on Missing Preferences for Place of Death Hoare, Sarah Morris, Zoë Slote Kelly, Michael P Kuhn, Isla Barclay, Stephen PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: End-of-life care policy has a focus on enabling patients to die in their preferred place; this is believed for most to be home. This review assesses patient preferences for place of death examining: the extent of unreported preferences, the importance of patient factors (place of care and health diagnosis) and who reports preferences. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Systematic literature review of 7 electronic databases, grey literature, backwards citations from included studies and Palliative Medicine hand search. Included studies published between 2000–2015, reporting original, quantifiable results of adult UK preferences for place of death. Of 10826 articles reviewed, 61 met the inclusion criteria. Summary charts present preferences for place of death by health diagnosis, where patients were asked and who reported the preference. These charts are recalculated to include ‘missing data,’ the views of those whose preferences were not asked, expressed or reported or absent in studies. Missing data were common. Across all health conditions when missing data were excluded the majority preference was for home: when missing data were included, it was not known what proportion of patients with cancer, non-cancer or multiple conditions preferred home. Patients, family proxies and public all expressed a majority preference for home when missing data were excluded: when included, it was not known what proportion of patients or family proxies preferred home. Where patients wished to die was related to where they were asked their preference. Missing data calculations are limited to ‘reported’ data. CONCLUSIONS: It is unknown what proportion of patients prefers to die at home or elsewhere. Reported preferences for place of death often exclude the views of those with no preference or not asked: when ‘missing data’ are included, they supress the proportion of preferences for all locations. Caution should be exercised if asserting that most patients prefer to die at home. Public Library of Science 2015-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4640665/ /pubmed/26555077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142723 Text en © 2015 Hoare et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hoare, Sarah
Morris, Zoë Slote
Kelly, Michael P
Kuhn, Isla
Barclay, Stephen
Do Patients Want to Die at Home? A Systematic Review of the UK Literature, Focused on Missing Preferences for Place of Death
title Do Patients Want to Die at Home? A Systematic Review of the UK Literature, Focused on Missing Preferences for Place of Death
title_full Do Patients Want to Die at Home? A Systematic Review of the UK Literature, Focused on Missing Preferences for Place of Death
title_fullStr Do Patients Want to Die at Home? A Systematic Review of the UK Literature, Focused on Missing Preferences for Place of Death
title_full_unstemmed Do Patients Want to Die at Home? A Systematic Review of the UK Literature, Focused on Missing Preferences for Place of Death
title_short Do Patients Want to Die at Home? A Systematic Review of the UK Literature, Focused on Missing Preferences for Place of Death
title_sort do patients want to die at home? a systematic review of the uk literature, focused on missing preferences for place of death
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4640665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26555077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142723
work_keys_str_mv AT hoaresarah dopatientswanttodieathomeasystematicreviewoftheukliteraturefocusedonmissingpreferencesforplaceofdeath
AT morriszoeslote dopatientswanttodieathomeasystematicreviewoftheukliteraturefocusedonmissingpreferencesforplaceofdeath
AT kellymichaelp dopatientswanttodieathomeasystematicreviewoftheukliteraturefocusedonmissingpreferencesforplaceofdeath
AT kuhnisla dopatientswanttodieathomeasystematicreviewoftheukliteraturefocusedonmissingpreferencesforplaceofdeath
AT barclaystephen dopatientswanttodieathomeasystematicreviewoftheukliteraturefocusedonmissingpreferencesforplaceofdeath