Cargando…
Do Patients Want to Die at Home? A Systematic Review of the UK Literature, Focused on Missing Preferences for Place of Death
BACKGROUND: End-of-life care policy has a focus on enabling patients to die in their preferred place; this is believed for most to be home. This review assesses patient preferences for place of death examining: the extent of unreported preferences, the importance of patient factors (place of care an...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4640665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26555077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142723 |
_version_ | 1782400113561305088 |
---|---|
author | Hoare, Sarah Morris, Zoë Slote Kelly, Michael P Kuhn, Isla Barclay, Stephen |
author_facet | Hoare, Sarah Morris, Zoë Slote Kelly, Michael P Kuhn, Isla Barclay, Stephen |
author_sort | Hoare, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: End-of-life care policy has a focus on enabling patients to die in their preferred place; this is believed for most to be home. This review assesses patient preferences for place of death examining: the extent of unreported preferences, the importance of patient factors (place of care and health diagnosis) and who reports preferences. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Systematic literature review of 7 electronic databases, grey literature, backwards citations from included studies and Palliative Medicine hand search. Included studies published between 2000–2015, reporting original, quantifiable results of adult UK preferences for place of death. Of 10826 articles reviewed, 61 met the inclusion criteria. Summary charts present preferences for place of death by health diagnosis, where patients were asked and who reported the preference. These charts are recalculated to include ‘missing data,’ the views of those whose preferences were not asked, expressed or reported or absent in studies. Missing data were common. Across all health conditions when missing data were excluded the majority preference was for home: when missing data were included, it was not known what proportion of patients with cancer, non-cancer or multiple conditions preferred home. Patients, family proxies and public all expressed a majority preference for home when missing data were excluded: when included, it was not known what proportion of patients or family proxies preferred home. Where patients wished to die was related to where they were asked their preference. Missing data calculations are limited to ‘reported’ data. CONCLUSIONS: It is unknown what proportion of patients prefers to die at home or elsewhere. Reported preferences for place of death often exclude the views of those with no preference or not asked: when ‘missing data’ are included, they supress the proportion of preferences for all locations. Caution should be exercised if asserting that most patients prefer to die at home. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4640665 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46406652015-11-13 Do Patients Want to Die at Home? A Systematic Review of the UK Literature, Focused on Missing Preferences for Place of Death Hoare, Sarah Morris, Zoë Slote Kelly, Michael P Kuhn, Isla Barclay, Stephen PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: End-of-life care policy has a focus on enabling patients to die in their preferred place; this is believed for most to be home. This review assesses patient preferences for place of death examining: the extent of unreported preferences, the importance of patient factors (place of care and health diagnosis) and who reports preferences. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Systematic literature review of 7 electronic databases, grey literature, backwards citations from included studies and Palliative Medicine hand search. Included studies published between 2000–2015, reporting original, quantifiable results of adult UK preferences for place of death. Of 10826 articles reviewed, 61 met the inclusion criteria. Summary charts present preferences for place of death by health diagnosis, where patients were asked and who reported the preference. These charts are recalculated to include ‘missing data,’ the views of those whose preferences were not asked, expressed or reported or absent in studies. Missing data were common. Across all health conditions when missing data were excluded the majority preference was for home: when missing data were included, it was not known what proportion of patients with cancer, non-cancer or multiple conditions preferred home. Patients, family proxies and public all expressed a majority preference for home when missing data were excluded: when included, it was not known what proportion of patients or family proxies preferred home. Where patients wished to die was related to where they were asked their preference. Missing data calculations are limited to ‘reported’ data. CONCLUSIONS: It is unknown what proportion of patients prefers to die at home or elsewhere. Reported preferences for place of death often exclude the views of those with no preference or not asked: when ‘missing data’ are included, they supress the proportion of preferences for all locations. Caution should be exercised if asserting that most patients prefer to die at home. Public Library of Science 2015-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4640665/ /pubmed/26555077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142723 Text en © 2015 Hoare et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hoare, Sarah Morris, Zoë Slote Kelly, Michael P Kuhn, Isla Barclay, Stephen Do Patients Want to Die at Home? A Systematic Review of the UK Literature, Focused on Missing Preferences for Place of Death |
title | Do Patients Want to Die at Home? A Systematic Review of the UK Literature, Focused on Missing Preferences for Place of Death |
title_full | Do Patients Want to Die at Home? A Systematic Review of the UK Literature, Focused on Missing Preferences for Place of Death |
title_fullStr | Do Patients Want to Die at Home? A Systematic Review of the UK Literature, Focused on Missing Preferences for Place of Death |
title_full_unstemmed | Do Patients Want to Die at Home? A Systematic Review of the UK Literature, Focused on Missing Preferences for Place of Death |
title_short | Do Patients Want to Die at Home? A Systematic Review of the UK Literature, Focused on Missing Preferences for Place of Death |
title_sort | do patients want to die at home? a systematic review of the uk literature, focused on missing preferences for place of death |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4640665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26555077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142723 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoaresarah dopatientswanttodieathomeasystematicreviewoftheukliteraturefocusedonmissingpreferencesforplaceofdeath AT morriszoeslote dopatientswanttodieathomeasystematicreviewoftheukliteraturefocusedonmissingpreferencesforplaceofdeath AT kellymichaelp dopatientswanttodieathomeasystematicreviewoftheukliteraturefocusedonmissingpreferencesforplaceofdeath AT kuhnisla dopatientswanttodieathomeasystematicreviewoftheukliteraturefocusedonmissingpreferencesforplaceofdeath AT barclaystephen dopatientswanttodieathomeasystematicreviewoftheukliteraturefocusedonmissingpreferencesforplaceofdeath |