Cargando…
Food Composition Database Format and Structure: A User Focused Approach
This study aimed to investigate the needs of Australian food composition database user’s regarding database format and relate this to the format of databases available globally. Three semi structured synchronous online focus groups (M = 3, F = 11) and n = 6 female key informant interviews were recor...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4640668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26554836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142137 |
_version_ | 1782400114240782336 |
---|---|
author | Clancy, Annabel K. Woods, Kaitlyn McMahon, Anne Probst, Yasmine |
author_facet | Clancy, Annabel K. Woods, Kaitlyn McMahon, Anne Probst, Yasmine |
author_sort | Clancy, Annabel K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to investigate the needs of Australian food composition database user’s regarding database format and relate this to the format of databases available globally. Three semi structured synchronous online focus groups (M = 3, F = 11) and n = 6 female key informant interviews were recorded. Beliefs surrounding the use, training, understanding, benefits and limitations of food composition data and databases were explored. Verbatim transcriptions underwent preliminary coding followed by thematic analysis with NVivo qualitative analysis software to extract the final themes. Schematic analysis was applied to the final themes related to database format. Desktop analysis also examined the format of six key globally available databases. 24 dominant themes were established, of which five related to format; database use, food classification, framework, accessibility and availability, and data derivation. Desktop analysis revealed that food classification systems varied considerably between databases. Microsoft Excel was a common file format used in all databases, and available software varied between countries. User’s also recognised that food composition databases format should ideally be designed specifically for the intended use, have a user-friendly food classification system, incorporate accurate data with clear explanation of data derivation and feature user input. However, such databases are limited by data availability and resources. Further exploration of data sharing options should be considered. Furthermore, user’s understanding of food composition data and databases limitations is inherent to the correct application of non-specific databases. Therefore, further exploration of user FCDB training should also be considered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4640668 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46406682015-11-13 Food Composition Database Format and Structure: A User Focused Approach Clancy, Annabel K. Woods, Kaitlyn McMahon, Anne Probst, Yasmine PLoS One Research Article This study aimed to investigate the needs of Australian food composition database user’s regarding database format and relate this to the format of databases available globally. Three semi structured synchronous online focus groups (M = 3, F = 11) and n = 6 female key informant interviews were recorded. Beliefs surrounding the use, training, understanding, benefits and limitations of food composition data and databases were explored. Verbatim transcriptions underwent preliminary coding followed by thematic analysis with NVivo qualitative analysis software to extract the final themes. Schematic analysis was applied to the final themes related to database format. Desktop analysis also examined the format of six key globally available databases. 24 dominant themes were established, of which five related to format; database use, food classification, framework, accessibility and availability, and data derivation. Desktop analysis revealed that food classification systems varied considerably between databases. Microsoft Excel was a common file format used in all databases, and available software varied between countries. User’s also recognised that food composition databases format should ideally be designed specifically for the intended use, have a user-friendly food classification system, incorporate accurate data with clear explanation of data derivation and feature user input. However, such databases are limited by data availability and resources. Further exploration of data sharing options should be considered. Furthermore, user’s understanding of food composition data and databases limitations is inherent to the correct application of non-specific databases. Therefore, further exploration of user FCDB training should also be considered. Public Library of Science 2015-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4640668/ /pubmed/26554836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142137 Text en © 2015 Clancy et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Clancy, Annabel K. Woods, Kaitlyn McMahon, Anne Probst, Yasmine Food Composition Database Format and Structure: A User Focused Approach |
title | Food Composition Database Format and Structure: A User Focused Approach |
title_full | Food Composition Database Format and Structure: A User Focused Approach |
title_fullStr | Food Composition Database Format and Structure: A User Focused Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Food Composition Database Format and Structure: A User Focused Approach |
title_short | Food Composition Database Format and Structure: A User Focused Approach |
title_sort | food composition database format and structure: a user focused approach |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4640668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26554836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142137 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT clancyannabelk foodcompositiondatabaseformatandstructureauserfocusedapproach AT woodskaitlyn foodcompositiondatabaseformatandstructureauserfocusedapproach AT mcmahonanne foodcompositiondatabaseformatandstructureauserfocusedapproach AT probstyasmine foodcompositiondatabaseformatandstructureauserfocusedapproach |