Cargando…

Food Composition Database Format and Structure: A User Focused Approach

This study aimed to investigate the needs of Australian food composition database user’s regarding database format and relate this to the format of databases available globally. Three semi structured synchronous online focus groups (M = 3, F = 11) and n = 6 female key informant interviews were recor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clancy, Annabel K., Woods, Kaitlyn, McMahon, Anne, Probst, Yasmine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4640668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26554836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142137
_version_ 1782400114240782336
author Clancy, Annabel K.
Woods, Kaitlyn
McMahon, Anne
Probst, Yasmine
author_facet Clancy, Annabel K.
Woods, Kaitlyn
McMahon, Anne
Probst, Yasmine
author_sort Clancy, Annabel K.
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to investigate the needs of Australian food composition database user’s regarding database format and relate this to the format of databases available globally. Three semi structured synchronous online focus groups (M = 3, F = 11) and n = 6 female key informant interviews were recorded. Beliefs surrounding the use, training, understanding, benefits and limitations of food composition data and databases were explored. Verbatim transcriptions underwent preliminary coding followed by thematic analysis with NVivo qualitative analysis software to extract the final themes. Schematic analysis was applied to the final themes related to database format. Desktop analysis also examined the format of six key globally available databases. 24 dominant themes were established, of which five related to format; database use, food classification, framework, accessibility and availability, and data derivation. Desktop analysis revealed that food classification systems varied considerably between databases. Microsoft Excel was a common file format used in all databases, and available software varied between countries. User’s also recognised that food composition databases format should ideally be designed specifically for the intended use, have a user-friendly food classification system, incorporate accurate data with clear explanation of data derivation and feature user input. However, such databases are limited by data availability and resources. Further exploration of data sharing options should be considered. Furthermore, user’s understanding of food composition data and databases limitations is inherent to the correct application of non-specific databases. Therefore, further exploration of user FCDB training should also be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4640668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46406682015-11-13 Food Composition Database Format and Structure: A User Focused Approach Clancy, Annabel K. Woods, Kaitlyn McMahon, Anne Probst, Yasmine PLoS One Research Article This study aimed to investigate the needs of Australian food composition database user’s regarding database format and relate this to the format of databases available globally. Three semi structured synchronous online focus groups (M = 3, F = 11) and n = 6 female key informant interviews were recorded. Beliefs surrounding the use, training, understanding, benefits and limitations of food composition data and databases were explored. Verbatim transcriptions underwent preliminary coding followed by thematic analysis with NVivo qualitative analysis software to extract the final themes. Schematic analysis was applied to the final themes related to database format. Desktop analysis also examined the format of six key globally available databases. 24 dominant themes were established, of which five related to format; database use, food classification, framework, accessibility and availability, and data derivation. Desktop analysis revealed that food classification systems varied considerably between databases. Microsoft Excel was a common file format used in all databases, and available software varied between countries. User’s also recognised that food composition databases format should ideally be designed specifically for the intended use, have a user-friendly food classification system, incorporate accurate data with clear explanation of data derivation and feature user input. However, such databases are limited by data availability and resources. Further exploration of data sharing options should be considered. Furthermore, user’s understanding of food composition data and databases limitations is inherent to the correct application of non-specific databases. Therefore, further exploration of user FCDB training should also be considered. Public Library of Science 2015-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4640668/ /pubmed/26554836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142137 Text en © 2015 Clancy et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Clancy, Annabel K.
Woods, Kaitlyn
McMahon, Anne
Probst, Yasmine
Food Composition Database Format and Structure: A User Focused Approach
title Food Composition Database Format and Structure: A User Focused Approach
title_full Food Composition Database Format and Structure: A User Focused Approach
title_fullStr Food Composition Database Format and Structure: A User Focused Approach
title_full_unstemmed Food Composition Database Format and Structure: A User Focused Approach
title_short Food Composition Database Format and Structure: A User Focused Approach
title_sort food composition database format and structure: a user focused approach
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4640668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26554836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142137
work_keys_str_mv AT clancyannabelk foodcompositiondatabaseformatandstructureauserfocusedapproach
AT woodskaitlyn foodcompositiondatabaseformatandstructureauserfocusedapproach
AT mcmahonanne foodcompositiondatabaseformatandstructureauserfocusedapproach
AT probstyasmine foodcompositiondatabaseformatandstructureauserfocusedapproach