Cargando…

Does the frequency and intensity of physical activity in adolescence have an impact on bone? The Tromsø Study, Fit Futures

BACKGROUND: Optimization of the genetic potential for bone accrual in early life may prevent future fractures. Possible modification factors include lifestyle factors such as nutrition and physical activity. Measured levels of bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mass content (BMC) are indicators of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christoffersen, Tore, Winther, Anne, Nilsen, Ole Andreas, Ahmed, Luai Awad, Furberg, Anne-Sofie, Grimnes, Guri, Dennison, Elaine, Emaus, Nina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4641333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26561526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-015-0020-y
_version_ 1782400181841428480
author Christoffersen, Tore
Winther, Anne
Nilsen, Ole Andreas
Ahmed, Luai Awad
Furberg, Anne-Sofie
Grimnes, Guri
Dennison, Elaine
Emaus, Nina
author_facet Christoffersen, Tore
Winther, Anne
Nilsen, Ole Andreas
Ahmed, Luai Awad
Furberg, Anne-Sofie
Grimnes, Guri
Dennison, Elaine
Emaus, Nina
author_sort Christoffersen, Tore
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Optimization of the genetic potential for bone accrual in early life may prevent future fractures. Possible modification factors include lifestyle factors such as nutrition and physical activity. Measured levels of bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mass content (BMC) are indicators of bone strength, and are correlated with fracture risk. This study explored the impact of self-reported physical activity frequencies and intensity on BMD and BMC in Norwegian adolescents. METHODS: In 2010–2011 school students in two North-Norwegian municipalities were invited to a health survey, the Fit Future study. 508 girls and 530 boys aged 15–18 years attended. BMD and BMC were measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry. Physical activity and other lifestyle-factors were reported by questionnaires and clinical interviews. Statistical analyses were performed sex stratified, using ANOVA for comparison of means and linear regression models adjusting for factors known to affect bone. RESULTS: Approximately 2/3 of girls and boys reported themselves as physically active outside school hours. Active participants had a significantly higher BMD and BMC at all sites (p < 0.001), except for BMC total body in girls, compared to inactive participants. In multiple linear regression analyses, increased physical activity measured as days a week, categorized into seldom, moderate and highly, was positively associated with BMD (g/cm(2)) at all sites in girls. Girls reporting themselves as highly active had BMD levels 0.093 g/cm(2), 0.090 g/cm(2) and 0.046 g/cm(2) higher (p < 0.001) than their more seldom active peers at femoral neck, total hip and total body respectively. Corresponding values for boys were 0.125 g/cm(2), 0.133 g/cm(2) and 0.66 g/cm(2). BMC measures showed similar trends at femoral neck and total hip. CONCLUSIONS: Increased level of physical activity is associated with higher BMD and BMC levels in adolescents. For both sexes high activity frequency seems to be essential, whilst boys reporting quite hard intensity has an additional impact. The differential effects of physical activity on bone strength in adolescence have clinical implications, especially in preventive strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4641333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46413332015-11-12 Does the frequency and intensity of physical activity in adolescence have an impact on bone? The Tromsø Study, Fit Futures Christoffersen, Tore Winther, Anne Nilsen, Ole Andreas Ahmed, Luai Awad Furberg, Anne-Sofie Grimnes, Guri Dennison, Elaine Emaus, Nina BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Research Article BACKGROUND: Optimization of the genetic potential for bone accrual in early life may prevent future fractures. Possible modification factors include lifestyle factors such as nutrition and physical activity. Measured levels of bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mass content (BMC) are indicators of bone strength, and are correlated with fracture risk. This study explored the impact of self-reported physical activity frequencies and intensity on BMD and BMC in Norwegian adolescents. METHODS: In 2010–2011 school students in two North-Norwegian municipalities were invited to a health survey, the Fit Future study. 508 girls and 530 boys aged 15–18 years attended. BMD and BMC were measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry. Physical activity and other lifestyle-factors were reported by questionnaires and clinical interviews. Statistical analyses were performed sex stratified, using ANOVA for comparison of means and linear regression models adjusting for factors known to affect bone. RESULTS: Approximately 2/3 of girls and boys reported themselves as physically active outside school hours. Active participants had a significantly higher BMD and BMC at all sites (p < 0.001), except for BMC total body in girls, compared to inactive participants. In multiple linear regression analyses, increased physical activity measured as days a week, categorized into seldom, moderate and highly, was positively associated with BMD (g/cm(2)) at all sites in girls. Girls reporting themselves as highly active had BMD levels 0.093 g/cm(2), 0.090 g/cm(2) and 0.046 g/cm(2) higher (p < 0.001) than their more seldom active peers at femoral neck, total hip and total body respectively. Corresponding values for boys were 0.125 g/cm(2), 0.133 g/cm(2) and 0.66 g/cm(2). BMC measures showed similar trends at femoral neck and total hip. CONCLUSIONS: Increased level of physical activity is associated with higher BMD and BMC levels in adolescents. For both sexes high activity frequency seems to be essential, whilst boys reporting quite hard intensity has an additional impact. The differential effects of physical activity on bone strength in adolescence have clinical implications, especially in preventive strategies. BioMed Central 2015-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4641333/ /pubmed/26561526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-015-0020-y Text en © Christoffersen et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Christoffersen, Tore
Winther, Anne
Nilsen, Ole Andreas
Ahmed, Luai Awad
Furberg, Anne-Sofie
Grimnes, Guri
Dennison, Elaine
Emaus, Nina
Does the frequency and intensity of physical activity in adolescence have an impact on bone? The Tromsø Study, Fit Futures
title Does the frequency and intensity of physical activity in adolescence have an impact on bone? The Tromsø Study, Fit Futures
title_full Does the frequency and intensity of physical activity in adolescence have an impact on bone? The Tromsø Study, Fit Futures
title_fullStr Does the frequency and intensity of physical activity in adolescence have an impact on bone? The Tromsø Study, Fit Futures
title_full_unstemmed Does the frequency and intensity of physical activity in adolescence have an impact on bone? The Tromsø Study, Fit Futures
title_short Does the frequency and intensity of physical activity in adolescence have an impact on bone? The Tromsø Study, Fit Futures
title_sort does the frequency and intensity of physical activity in adolescence have an impact on bone? the tromsø study, fit futures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4641333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26561526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-015-0020-y
work_keys_str_mv AT christoffersentore doesthefrequencyandintensityofphysicalactivityinadolescencehaveanimpactonbonethetromsøstudyfitfutures
AT wintheranne doesthefrequencyandintensityofphysicalactivityinadolescencehaveanimpactonbonethetromsøstudyfitfutures
AT nilsenoleandreas doesthefrequencyandintensityofphysicalactivityinadolescencehaveanimpactonbonethetromsøstudyfitfutures
AT ahmedluaiawad doesthefrequencyandintensityofphysicalactivityinadolescencehaveanimpactonbonethetromsøstudyfitfutures
AT furbergannesofie doesthefrequencyandintensityofphysicalactivityinadolescencehaveanimpactonbonethetromsøstudyfitfutures
AT grimnesguri doesthefrequencyandintensityofphysicalactivityinadolescencehaveanimpactonbonethetromsøstudyfitfutures
AT dennisonelaine doesthefrequencyandintensityofphysicalactivityinadolescencehaveanimpactonbonethetromsøstudyfitfutures
AT emausnina doesthefrequencyandintensityofphysicalactivityinadolescencehaveanimpactonbonethetromsøstudyfitfutures