Cargando…

Understanding adverse drug reactions in package leaflets – an exploratory survey among health care professionals

BACKGROUND: Current German or UK package leaflets do not contain an explicit notice that the listing of side effects does not imply that they are caused by the drug. Causal interpretations by patients and lay people are frequently observed. The authors examined whether health professionals understan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mühlbauer, Viktoria, Mühlhauser, Ingrid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4641349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26554666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1160-1
_version_ 1782400185527173120
author Mühlbauer, Viktoria
Mühlhauser, Ingrid
author_facet Mühlbauer, Viktoria
Mühlhauser, Ingrid
author_sort Mühlbauer, Viktoria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current German or UK package leaflets do not contain an explicit notice that the listing of side effects does not imply that they are caused by the drug. Causal interpretations by patients and lay people are frequently observed. The authors examined whether health professionals understand that there is not necessarily a causal relation between drug intake and the frequency of side effects and whether adding placebo comparison improves understanding. METHODS: Exploratory survey consisting of eight assessments, each containing 2–6 survey items, and focus groups with one survey sample using questionnaires on adverse reactions in standard package leaflets and modified package leaflets supplemented with placebo comparison. Participants were convenience samples of 379 health professionals including 153 physicians (80 gynaecologists, 124 diabetes experts - physicians, nurses, and others, 39 medical students in their last year at university, 49 first year health science and education students with completed vocational training and professional experience in various health care professions and 87 pharmacists/pharmacy students). They were asked to rate how often the different adverse reactions listed were caused by drug intake. All surveys were carried out within university seminars and postgraduate lectures from April 2014 to June 2015 in Germany. Response rate was 86 % or higher. RESULTS: Without placebo comparison, the majority of participants responded that the drug causes adverse reactions with the frequency given in the package leaflet or even more often (95 % of health science students, 100 % of medical students, 60 to 80 % of physicians and 66 % of pharmacists/pharmacy students). Simply adding placebo comparison in a table did not prevent misunderstanding. Analysis of focus groups with health science students supported the lack of understanding. CONCLUSIONS: In the present surveys, health professionals had major difficulties understanding frequency information on side effects in package leaflets. The great majority erroneously implied a causal relation between drug intake and the frequency of side effects, even though most side effects listed are symptoms commonly experienced in daily life. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1160-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4641349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46413492015-11-12 Understanding adverse drug reactions in package leaflets – an exploratory survey among health care professionals Mühlbauer, Viktoria Mühlhauser, Ingrid BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Current German or UK package leaflets do not contain an explicit notice that the listing of side effects does not imply that they are caused by the drug. Causal interpretations by patients and lay people are frequently observed. The authors examined whether health professionals understand that there is not necessarily a causal relation between drug intake and the frequency of side effects and whether adding placebo comparison improves understanding. METHODS: Exploratory survey consisting of eight assessments, each containing 2–6 survey items, and focus groups with one survey sample using questionnaires on adverse reactions in standard package leaflets and modified package leaflets supplemented with placebo comparison. Participants were convenience samples of 379 health professionals including 153 physicians (80 gynaecologists, 124 diabetes experts - physicians, nurses, and others, 39 medical students in their last year at university, 49 first year health science and education students with completed vocational training and professional experience in various health care professions and 87 pharmacists/pharmacy students). They were asked to rate how often the different adverse reactions listed were caused by drug intake. All surveys were carried out within university seminars and postgraduate lectures from April 2014 to June 2015 in Germany. Response rate was 86 % or higher. RESULTS: Without placebo comparison, the majority of participants responded that the drug causes adverse reactions with the frequency given in the package leaflet or even more often (95 % of health science students, 100 % of medical students, 60 to 80 % of physicians and 66 % of pharmacists/pharmacy students). Simply adding placebo comparison in a table did not prevent misunderstanding. Analysis of focus groups with health science students supported the lack of understanding. CONCLUSIONS: In the present surveys, health professionals had major difficulties understanding frequency information on side effects in package leaflets. The great majority erroneously implied a causal relation between drug intake and the frequency of side effects, even though most side effects listed are symptoms commonly experienced in daily life. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1160-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4641349/ /pubmed/26554666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1160-1 Text en © Mühlbauer and Mühlhauser. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mühlbauer, Viktoria
Mühlhauser, Ingrid
Understanding adverse drug reactions in package leaflets – an exploratory survey among health care professionals
title Understanding adverse drug reactions in package leaflets – an exploratory survey among health care professionals
title_full Understanding adverse drug reactions in package leaflets – an exploratory survey among health care professionals
title_fullStr Understanding adverse drug reactions in package leaflets – an exploratory survey among health care professionals
title_full_unstemmed Understanding adverse drug reactions in package leaflets – an exploratory survey among health care professionals
title_short Understanding adverse drug reactions in package leaflets – an exploratory survey among health care professionals
title_sort understanding adverse drug reactions in package leaflets – an exploratory survey among health care professionals
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4641349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26554666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1160-1
work_keys_str_mv AT muhlbauerviktoria understandingadversedrugreactionsinpackageleafletsanexploratorysurveyamonghealthcareprofessionals
AT muhlhauseringrid understandingadversedrugreactionsinpackageleafletsanexploratorysurveyamonghealthcareprofessionals