Cargando…

All that is blood is not schistosomiasis: experiences with reagent strip testing for urogenital schistosomiasis with special consideration to very-low prevalence settings

BACKGROUND: Reagent strip testing for microhaematuria has long been used for community diagnosis of Schistosoma haematobium. Sensitivities and specificities are reasonable, and hence, microhaematuria can serve as a proxy for S. haematobium infection. However, assessment of test performance in the co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krauth, Stefanie J., Greter, Helena, Stete, Katarina, Coulibaly, Jean T., Traoré, Seïdinan I., Ngandolo, Bongo N. R., Achi, Louise Y., Zinsstag, Jakob, N’Goran, Eliézer K., Utzinger, Jürg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4641389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26554822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1165-y
_version_ 1782400194639298560
author Krauth, Stefanie J.
Greter, Helena
Stete, Katarina
Coulibaly, Jean T.
Traoré, Seïdinan I.
Ngandolo, Bongo N. R.
Achi, Louise Y.
Zinsstag, Jakob
N’Goran, Eliézer K.
Utzinger, Jürg
author_facet Krauth, Stefanie J.
Greter, Helena
Stete, Katarina
Coulibaly, Jean T.
Traoré, Seïdinan I.
Ngandolo, Bongo N. R.
Achi, Louise Y.
Zinsstag, Jakob
N’Goran, Eliézer K.
Utzinger, Jürg
author_sort Krauth, Stefanie J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reagent strip testing for microhaematuria has long been used for community diagnosis of Schistosoma haematobium. Sensitivities and specificities are reasonable, and hence, microhaematuria can serve as a proxy for S. haematobium infection. However, assessment of test performance in the context of the underlying S. haematobium prevalence is rare and test parameters other than sensitivity and specificity have been neglected. METHODS: Data about the association between microhaematuria and urine filtration results from three studies were compared and put into context with findings from a recent Cochrane review. Data were stratified by S. haematobium prevalence to identify prevalence-related differences in test performance. Kappa agreement and regression models were employed to compare data for different S. haematobium prevalence categories. RESULTS: We found a “background” prevalence of microhaematuria (13 %, on average) which does not seem to be associated with schistosomiasis in most settings, irrespective of the prevalence of S. haematobium. This background level of microhaematuria might be due to cases missed with urine filtration, or alternative causes apart from S. haematobium. Especially in very-low prevalence settings, positive results for microhaematuria likely give an inaccurate picture of the extent of S. haematobium, whereas negative results are a sound indicator for the absence of infection. CONCLUSIONS: Reagent strip testing for microhaematuria remains a good proxy for urogenital schistosomiasis, but implications of test results and scope of application differ depending on the setting in which reagent strips are employed. In very-low prevalence settings, microhaematuria is an unstable proxy for urogenital schistosomiasis and treatment decision should not be based on reagent strip test results alone. Our findings underscore the need for highly accurate diagnostic tools for settings targeted for elimination of urogenital schistosomiasis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4641389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46413892015-11-12 All that is blood is not schistosomiasis: experiences with reagent strip testing for urogenital schistosomiasis with special consideration to very-low prevalence settings Krauth, Stefanie J. Greter, Helena Stete, Katarina Coulibaly, Jean T. Traoré, Seïdinan I. Ngandolo, Bongo N. R. Achi, Louise Y. Zinsstag, Jakob N’Goran, Eliézer K. Utzinger, Jürg Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Reagent strip testing for microhaematuria has long been used for community diagnosis of Schistosoma haematobium. Sensitivities and specificities are reasonable, and hence, microhaematuria can serve as a proxy for S. haematobium infection. However, assessment of test performance in the context of the underlying S. haematobium prevalence is rare and test parameters other than sensitivity and specificity have been neglected. METHODS: Data about the association between microhaematuria and urine filtration results from three studies were compared and put into context with findings from a recent Cochrane review. Data were stratified by S. haematobium prevalence to identify prevalence-related differences in test performance. Kappa agreement and regression models were employed to compare data for different S. haematobium prevalence categories. RESULTS: We found a “background” prevalence of microhaematuria (13 %, on average) which does not seem to be associated with schistosomiasis in most settings, irrespective of the prevalence of S. haematobium. This background level of microhaematuria might be due to cases missed with urine filtration, or alternative causes apart from S. haematobium. Especially in very-low prevalence settings, positive results for microhaematuria likely give an inaccurate picture of the extent of S. haematobium, whereas negative results are a sound indicator for the absence of infection. CONCLUSIONS: Reagent strip testing for microhaematuria remains a good proxy for urogenital schistosomiasis, but implications of test results and scope of application differ depending on the setting in which reagent strips are employed. In very-low prevalence settings, microhaematuria is an unstable proxy for urogenital schistosomiasis and treatment decision should not be based on reagent strip test results alone. Our findings underscore the need for highly accurate diagnostic tools for settings targeted for elimination of urogenital schistosomiasis. BioMed Central 2015-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4641389/ /pubmed/26554822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1165-y Text en © Krauth et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Krauth, Stefanie J.
Greter, Helena
Stete, Katarina
Coulibaly, Jean T.
Traoré, Seïdinan I.
Ngandolo, Bongo N. R.
Achi, Louise Y.
Zinsstag, Jakob
N’Goran, Eliézer K.
Utzinger, Jürg
All that is blood is not schistosomiasis: experiences with reagent strip testing for urogenital schistosomiasis with special consideration to very-low prevalence settings
title All that is blood is not schistosomiasis: experiences with reagent strip testing for urogenital schistosomiasis with special consideration to very-low prevalence settings
title_full All that is blood is not schistosomiasis: experiences with reagent strip testing for urogenital schistosomiasis with special consideration to very-low prevalence settings
title_fullStr All that is blood is not schistosomiasis: experiences with reagent strip testing for urogenital schistosomiasis with special consideration to very-low prevalence settings
title_full_unstemmed All that is blood is not schistosomiasis: experiences with reagent strip testing for urogenital schistosomiasis with special consideration to very-low prevalence settings
title_short All that is blood is not schistosomiasis: experiences with reagent strip testing for urogenital schistosomiasis with special consideration to very-low prevalence settings
title_sort all that is blood is not schistosomiasis: experiences with reagent strip testing for urogenital schistosomiasis with special consideration to very-low prevalence settings
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4641389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26554822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1165-y
work_keys_str_mv AT krauthstefaniej allthatisbloodisnotschistosomiasisexperienceswithreagentstriptestingforurogenitalschistosomiasiswithspecialconsiderationtoverylowprevalencesettings
AT greterhelena allthatisbloodisnotschistosomiasisexperienceswithreagentstriptestingforurogenitalschistosomiasiswithspecialconsiderationtoverylowprevalencesettings
AT stetekatarina allthatisbloodisnotschistosomiasisexperienceswithreagentstriptestingforurogenitalschistosomiasiswithspecialconsiderationtoverylowprevalencesettings
AT coulibalyjeant allthatisbloodisnotschistosomiasisexperienceswithreagentstriptestingforurogenitalschistosomiasiswithspecialconsiderationtoverylowprevalencesettings
AT traoreseidinani allthatisbloodisnotschistosomiasisexperienceswithreagentstriptestingforurogenitalschistosomiasiswithspecialconsiderationtoverylowprevalencesettings
AT ngandolobongonr allthatisbloodisnotschistosomiasisexperienceswithreagentstriptestingforurogenitalschistosomiasiswithspecialconsiderationtoverylowprevalencesettings
AT achilouisey allthatisbloodisnotschistosomiasisexperienceswithreagentstriptestingforurogenitalschistosomiasiswithspecialconsiderationtoverylowprevalencesettings
AT zinsstagjakob allthatisbloodisnotschistosomiasisexperienceswithreagentstriptestingforurogenitalschistosomiasiswithspecialconsiderationtoverylowprevalencesettings
AT ngoraneliezerk allthatisbloodisnotschistosomiasisexperienceswithreagentstriptestingforurogenitalschistosomiasiswithspecialconsiderationtoverylowprevalencesettings
AT utzingerjurg allthatisbloodisnotschistosomiasisexperienceswithreagentstriptestingforurogenitalschistosomiasiswithspecialconsiderationtoverylowprevalencesettings