Cargando…

Allergen immunotherapy in pregnancy

BACKGROUND: Allergic diseases such as asthma and allergic rhinitis constitute a significant burden of disease among women of childbearing age and those who are pregnant. Adequately managing these conditions is paramount in reducing negative fetal outcomes as well as maternal complications during pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oykhman, Paul, Kim, Harold L., Ellis, Anne K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4641390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26561490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13223-015-0096-7
_version_ 1782400194869985280
author Oykhman, Paul
Kim, Harold L.
Ellis, Anne K.
author_facet Oykhman, Paul
Kim, Harold L.
Ellis, Anne K.
author_sort Oykhman, Paul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Allergic diseases such as asthma and allergic rhinitis constitute a significant burden of disease among women of childbearing age and those who are pregnant. Adequately managing these conditions is paramount in reducing negative fetal outcomes as well as maternal complications during pregnancy. However, the potential for harm to both the mother and fetus demands carefully balancing efficacy and safety of treatment. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) has emerged as a relatively safe and efficacious mode of therapy in both children and adults. AIT has also been considered for use during pregnancy. METHODS: A review of the literature was conducted for data regarding the safety of initiation and continuation of AIT during pregnancy as well as the effect of AIT on the development of atopy in offspring. MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library were searched for clinical trials, randomized control trials, observational studies and journal articles in English using the terms "Pregnancy" and "Immunotherapy" from 1900 to present. This yielded 4 studies (totaling 422 pregnancies receiving AIT) investigating the continuation of AIT in pregnancy, 2 (totaling 31 pregnancies receiving AIT) evaluating AIT initiation during pregnancy and 5 observing the effect of AIT on atopy in offspring. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in the incidence of prematurity, hypertension (HTN)/proteinuria, congenital malformations or perinatal deaths between the women continued on AIT (both subcutaneous (SC) IT and sublingual (SL) IT to inhalant allergens as well as venom IT) during pregnancy and controls. Similarly, there was no significant difference in maternal or fetal complications between pregnant women initiated on AIT and controls. Among the few pregnant women (10/453 pregnancies) who experienced generalized reactions while receiving AIT, none were found to have fetal complications. Neither SCIT nor SLIT during pregnancy altered the risk of developing atopic disease in offspring. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these data, the continuation of AIT during pregnancy appears safe. Furthermore, the few data available suggest that the initiation of AIT during pregnancy might also be safe, however, more data is required for a definitive conclusion. Lastly, available studies do not show a convincing reduction in the development of atopy in offspring from the administration of AIT during pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4641390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46413902015-11-12 Allergen immunotherapy in pregnancy Oykhman, Paul Kim, Harold L. Ellis, Anne K. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol Review BACKGROUND: Allergic diseases such as asthma and allergic rhinitis constitute a significant burden of disease among women of childbearing age and those who are pregnant. Adequately managing these conditions is paramount in reducing negative fetal outcomes as well as maternal complications during pregnancy. However, the potential for harm to both the mother and fetus demands carefully balancing efficacy and safety of treatment. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) has emerged as a relatively safe and efficacious mode of therapy in both children and adults. AIT has also been considered for use during pregnancy. METHODS: A review of the literature was conducted for data regarding the safety of initiation and continuation of AIT during pregnancy as well as the effect of AIT on the development of atopy in offspring. MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library were searched for clinical trials, randomized control trials, observational studies and journal articles in English using the terms "Pregnancy" and "Immunotherapy" from 1900 to present. This yielded 4 studies (totaling 422 pregnancies receiving AIT) investigating the continuation of AIT in pregnancy, 2 (totaling 31 pregnancies receiving AIT) evaluating AIT initiation during pregnancy and 5 observing the effect of AIT on atopy in offspring. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in the incidence of prematurity, hypertension (HTN)/proteinuria, congenital malformations or perinatal deaths between the women continued on AIT (both subcutaneous (SC) IT and sublingual (SL) IT to inhalant allergens as well as venom IT) during pregnancy and controls. Similarly, there was no significant difference in maternal or fetal complications between pregnant women initiated on AIT and controls. Among the few pregnant women (10/453 pregnancies) who experienced generalized reactions while receiving AIT, none were found to have fetal complications. Neither SCIT nor SLIT during pregnancy altered the risk of developing atopic disease in offspring. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these data, the continuation of AIT during pregnancy appears safe. Furthermore, the few data available suggest that the initiation of AIT during pregnancy might also be safe, however, more data is required for a definitive conclusion. Lastly, available studies do not show a convincing reduction in the development of atopy in offspring from the administration of AIT during pregnancy. BioMed Central 2015-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4641390/ /pubmed/26561490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13223-015-0096-7 Text en © Oykhman et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Oykhman, Paul
Kim, Harold L.
Ellis, Anne K.
Allergen immunotherapy in pregnancy
title Allergen immunotherapy in pregnancy
title_full Allergen immunotherapy in pregnancy
title_fullStr Allergen immunotherapy in pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed Allergen immunotherapy in pregnancy
title_short Allergen immunotherapy in pregnancy
title_sort allergen immunotherapy in pregnancy
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4641390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26561490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13223-015-0096-7
work_keys_str_mv AT oykhmanpaul allergenimmunotherapyinpregnancy
AT kimharoldl allergenimmunotherapyinpregnancy
AT ellisannek allergenimmunotherapyinpregnancy