Cargando…

Utilization of surgical safety checklists by urological surgeons in Germany: a nationwide prospective survey

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the contemporary usage rate and habits of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) in German urological departments. METHODS: We designed a 26-item questionnaire that was sent to all urological departments in Germany. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borgmann, Hendrik, Helbig, Sarah, Reiter, Michael A., Hüsch, Tanja, Schilling, David, Tsaur, Igor, Haferkamp, Axel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4641404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26561502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-015-0082-5
_version_ 1782400198041927680
author Borgmann, Hendrik
Helbig, Sarah
Reiter, Michael A.
Hüsch, Tanja
Schilling, David
Tsaur, Igor
Haferkamp, Axel
author_facet Borgmann, Hendrik
Helbig, Sarah
Reiter, Michael A.
Hüsch, Tanja
Schilling, David
Tsaur, Igor
Haferkamp, Axel
author_sort Borgmann, Hendrik
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the contemporary usage rate and habits of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) in German urological departments. METHODS: We designed a 26-item questionnaire that was sent to all urological departments in Germany. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the usage rate of the SSC. Secondary aims were to compare perioperative characteristics of users vs. non-users of the SSC and to assess circumstances of the SSC application. RESULTS: A total of 213 of 234 (91 %) urological departments were users of the SSC, and 21 (9 %) were non-users. SSC users had more often a standard protocol, took less time and had fewer people involved for checking perioperative patient data compared to non-users. Financial budgeting for the SSC existed in 55 (24 %) departments and for patient safety in 73 (32 %) departments. CONCLUSIONS: The usage rate of the SSC in urological departments in Germany is high despite restricted financial budgeting. Users of the SSC profit by saving time and manpower for checking perioperative patient data. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13037-015-0082-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4641404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46414042015-11-12 Utilization of surgical safety checklists by urological surgeons in Germany: a nationwide prospective survey Borgmann, Hendrik Helbig, Sarah Reiter, Michael A. Hüsch, Tanja Schilling, David Tsaur, Igor Haferkamp, Axel Patient Saf Surg Research OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the contemporary usage rate and habits of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) in German urological departments. METHODS: We designed a 26-item questionnaire that was sent to all urological departments in Germany. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the usage rate of the SSC. Secondary aims were to compare perioperative characteristics of users vs. non-users of the SSC and to assess circumstances of the SSC application. RESULTS: A total of 213 of 234 (91 %) urological departments were users of the SSC, and 21 (9 %) were non-users. SSC users had more often a standard protocol, took less time and had fewer people involved for checking perioperative patient data compared to non-users. Financial budgeting for the SSC existed in 55 (24 %) departments and for patient safety in 73 (32 %) departments. CONCLUSIONS: The usage rate of the SSC in urological departments in Germany is high despite restricted financial budgeting. Users of the SSC profit by saving time and manpower for checking perioperative patient data. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13037-015-0082-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4641404/ /pubmed/26561502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-015-0082-5 Text en © Borgmann et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Borgmann, Hendrik
Helbig, Sarah
Reiter, Michael A.
Hüsch, Tanja
Schilling, David
Tsaur, Igor
Haferkamp, Axel
Utilization of surgical safety checklists by urological surgeons in Germany: a nationwide prospective survey
title Utilization of surgical safety checklists by urological surgeons in Germany: a nationwide prospective survey
title_full Utilization of surgical safety checklists by urological surgeons in Germany: a nationwide prospective survey
title_fullStr Utilization of surgical safety checklists by urological surgeons in Germany: a nationwide prospective survey
title_full_unstemmed Utilization of surgical safety checklists by urological surgeons in Germany: a nationwide prospective survey
title_short Utilization of surgical safety checklists by urological surgeons in Germany: a nationwide prospective survey
title_sort utilization of surgical safety checklists by urological surgeons in germany: a nationwide prospective survey
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4641404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26561502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-015-0082-5
work_keys_str_mv AT borgmannhendrik utilizationofsurgicalsafetychecklistsbyurologicalsurgeonsingermanyanationwideprospectivesurvey
AT helbigsarah utilizationofsurgicalsafetychecklistsbyurologicalsurgeonsingermanyanationwideprospectivesurvey
AT reitermichaela utilizationofsurgicalsafetychecklistsbyurologicalsurgeonsingermanyanationwideprospectivesurvey
AT huschtanja utilizationofsurgicalsafetychecklistsbyurologicalsurgeonsingermanyanationwideprospectivesurvey
AT schillingdavid utilizationofsurgicalsafetychecklistsbyurologicalsurgeonsingermanyanationwideprospectivesurvey
AT tsaurigor utilizationofsurgicalsafetychecklistsbyurologicalsurgeonsingermanyanationwideprospectivesurvey
AT haferkampaxel utilizationofsurgicalsafetychecklistsbyurologicalsurgeonsingermanyanationwideprospectivesurvey