Cargando…
Utilization of surgical safety checklists by urological surgeons in Germany: a nationwide prospective survey
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the contemporary usage rate and habits of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) in German urological departments. METHODS: We designed a 26-item questionnaire that was sent to all urological departments in Germany. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4641404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26561502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-015-0082-5 |
_version_ | 1782400198041927680 |
---|---|
author | Borgmann, Hendrik Helbig, Sarah Reiter, Michael A. Hüsch, Tanja Schilling, David Tsaur, Igor Haferkamp, Axel |
author_facet | Borgmann, Hendrik Helbig, Sarah Reiter, Michael A. Hüsch, Tanja Schilling, David Tsaur, Igor Haferkamp, Axel |
author_sort | Borgmann, Hendrik |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the contemporary usage rate and habits of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) in German urological departments. METHODS: We designed a 26-item questionnaire that was sent to all urological departments in Germany. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the usage rate of the SSC. Secondary aims were to compare perioperative characteristics of users vs. non-users of the SSC and to assess circumstances of the SSC application. RESULTS: A total of 213 of 234 (91 %) urological departments were users of the SSC, and 21 (9 %) were non-users. SSC users had more often a standard protocol, took less time and had fewer people involved for checking perioperative patient data compared to non-users. Financial budgeting for the SSC existed in 55 (24 %) departments and for patient safety in 73 (32 %) departments. CONCLUSIONS: The usage rate of the SSC in urological departments in Germany is high despite restricted financial budgeting. Users of the SSC profit by saving time and manpower for checking perioperative patient data. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13037-015-0082-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4641404 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46414042015-11-12 Utilization of surgical safety checklists by urological surgeons in Germany: a nationwide prospective survey Borgmann, Hendrik Helbig, Sarah Reiter, Michael A. Hüsch, Tanja Schilling, David Tsaur, Igor Haferkamp, Axel Patient Saf Surg Research OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the contemporary usage rate and habits of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) in German urological departments. METHODS: We designed a 26-item questionnaire that was sent to all urological departments in Germany. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the usage rate of the SSC. Secondary aims were to compare perioperative characteristics of users vs. non-users of the SSC and to assess circumstances of the SSC application. RESULTS: A total of 213 of 234 (91 %) urological departments were users of the SSC, and 21 (9 %) were non-users. SSC users had more often a standard protocol, took less time and had fewer people involved for checking perioperative patient data compared to non-users. Financial budgeting for the SSC existed in 55 (24 %) departments and for patient safety in 73 (32 %) departments. CONCLUSIONS: The usage rate of the SSC in urological departments in Germany is high despite restricted financial budgeting. Users of the SSC profit by saving time and manpower for checking perioperative patient data. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13037-015-0082-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4641404/ /pubmed/26561502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-015-0082-5 Text en © Borgmann et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Borgmann, Hendrik Helbig, Sarah Reiter, Michael A. Hüsch, Tanja Schilling, David Tsaur, Igor Haferkamp, Axel Utilization of surgical safety checklists by urological surgeons in Germany: a nationwide prospective survey |
title | Utilization of surgical safety checklists by urological surgeons in Germany: a nationwide prospective survey |
title_full | Utilization of surgical safety checklists by urological surgeons in Germany: a nationwide prospective survey |
title_fullStr | Utilization of surgical safety checklists by urological surgeons in Germany: a nationwide prospective survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Utilization of surgical safety checklists by urological surgeons in Germany: a nationwide prospective survey |
title_short | Utilization of surgical safety checklists by urological surgeons in Germany: a nationwide prospective survey |
title_sort | utilization of surgical safety checklists by urological surgeons in germany: a nationwide prospective survey |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4641404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26561502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-015-0082-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT borgmannhendrik utilizationofsurgicalsafetychecklistsbyurologicalsurgeonsingermanyanationwideprospectivesurvey AT helbigsarah utilizationofsurgicalsafetychecklistsbyurologicalsurgeonsingermanyanationwideprospectivesurvey AT reitermichaela utilizationofsurgicalsafetychecklistsbyurologicalsurgeonsingermanyanationwideprospectivesurvey AT huschtanja utilizationofsurgicalsafetychecklistsbyurologicalsurgeonsingermanyanationwideprospectivesurvey AT schillingdavid utilizationofsurgicalsafetychecklistsbyurologicalsurgeonsingermanyanationwideprospectivesurvey AT tsaurigor utilizationofsurgicalsafetychecklistsbyurologicalsurgeonsingermanyanationwideprospectivesurvey AT haferkampaxel utilizationofsurgicalsafetychecklistsbyurologicalsurgeonsingermanyanationwideprospectivesurvey |