Cargando…

Making the most of peer review

Journals should publish referee reports and respond to well-founded concerns about papers after publication.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Slavov, Nikolai
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2015
Materias:	Feature Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4641509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26559758 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12708

Ejemplares similares

Making the most of your dental therapist
Publicado: (2020)

Making the Most of In Vitro Tests to Diagnose Food Allergy
por: Santos, Alexandra F., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Gender bias in scholarly peer review
por: Helmer, Markus, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Journal policies and editors’ opinions on peer review
por: Hamilton, Daniel G, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Large-scale language analysis of peer review reports
por: Buljan, Ivan, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Peer-Led Education Expedites Deprescribing Proton Pump Inhibitors for Appropriate Veterans
por: Bowman, Mary H.
Publicado: (2020)

Let's make Golgi
por: Wells, William A.
Publicado: (2001)

Evolution Education across the Life Sciences: Making Biology Education Make Sense
por: Wei, Cynthia A., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Parental Decision Making in Male Circumcision
por: Sardi, Lauren, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Lipid rafts make for slippery platforms
por: Lai, Eric C.
Publicado: (2003)

Weak evidence of country- and institution-related status bias in the peer review of abstracts
por: Nielsen, Mathias Wullum, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Evidence-Based Decision-Making for Nurse Leaders
por: Sevy Majers, Joan, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Clinical Decision Making—A Functional Medicine Perspective
por: Pizzorno, Joseph E.
Publicado: (2012)

Letter to the Editor: Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) scoring of cleft patients treated within a regional cleft centre in the United Kingdom
por: Bellardie, Haydn
Publicado: (2022)

Goal-Based Shared Decision-Making: Developing an Integrated Model
por: Elwyn, Glyn, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Creating a collaborative peer writing group during residency
por: Lukolyo, Heather, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Explaining performance in health care: How and when top management competencies make the difference
por: Vainieri, Milena, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Catching Education Up with Technology: Preparing the Public to Make Informed Choices about Personal Genetics
por: Gelbart, M. E.
Publicado: (2012)

Making an IMPACTT: A framework for developing a dentist's ability to provide comprehensive dental care
por: Aulakh, Raman
Publicado: (2022)

A retrospective analysis of the peer review of more than 75,000 Marie Curie proposals between 2007 and 2018
por: Pina, David G, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Making science count in government
por: Boyd, Ian
Publicado: (2013)

The making of microscope camera standards
por: Marx, Vivien
Publicado: (2022)

Making Sense of Modeling in Elementary Literacy Instruction
por: Schutz, Kristine M., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Peer review and preprint policies are unclear at most major journals
por: Klebel, Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Health sources: Reviewing the news
por: Bradbury, Sarah
Publicado: (2020)

Review of Intravenous Lipid Emulsion Therapy
por: Spray, Jeffery W.
Publicado: (2016)

Lateral Prefrontal Cortex Subregions Make Dissociable Contributions during Fluid Reasoning
por: Hampshire, Adam, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Effects of nurses' schedule characteristics on fatigue: An integrative review
por: Peršolja, Melita
Publicado: (2023)

Save LIVES technical package: 22 interventions that could make a difference
por: Peden, Margaret Mary, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Clinicians' views on conversations and shared decision making in diagnostic testing for Alzheimer's disease: The ABIDE project
por: Kunneman, Marleen, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The Injection Technique Factor: What You Don’t Know or Teach Can Make a Difference
por: Hirsch, Laurence J., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Time in Range: How to Measure It, How to Report It, and Its Practical Application in Clinical Decision-Making
por: Wright, Eugene E., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Patient Experience in Primary Care: A Systematic Review of CG-CAHPS Surveys
por: Holt, Jeana M
Publicado: (2018)

Integrative Review of the Interventions for Improving Patients’ Experiences Revealed in Quality Improvement Projects
por: Jun, Jin, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A Review of the Talc Industry’s Influence on Federal Regulation and Scientific Standards for Asbestos in Talc
por: Bird, Tess, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Patients' and caregivers' views on conversations and shared decision making in diagnostic testing for Alzheimer's disease: The ABIDE project
por: Kunneman, Marleen, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Individual and Team Factors Influencing the Adoption of Information and Communication Technology by Nurses: A Systematic Review
por: Coffetti, Elvira, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Health care professionals’ motivation, their behaviors, and the quality of hospital care: A mixed-methods systematic review
por: Veenstra, Gepke L., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The Process and Impact of Stakeholder Engagement in Developing a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Communication and Decision-Making Intervention
por: Michelson, Kelly N, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

A Systematic Review of the Effects of Resident Duty Hour Restrictions in Surgery: Impact on Resident Wellness, Training, and Patient Outcomes
por: Ahmed, Najma, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_ov15mf17oql6ul8qufase2pgpe