Cargando…
Pre-test probability risk scores and their use in contemporary management of patients with chest pain: One year stress echo cohort study
OBJECTIVES: To compare how patients with chest pain would be investigated, based on the two guidelines available for UK cardiologists, on the management of patients with stable chest pain. The UK National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guideline which was published in 2010 and the European...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4641557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26673458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054270415611295 |
_version_ | 1782400216106795008 |
---|---|
author | Demarco, Daniela Cassar Papachristidis, Alexandros Roper, Damian Tsironis, Ioannis Byrne, Jonathan Alfakih, Khaled Monaghan, Mark |
author_facet | Demarco, Daniela Cassar Papachristidis, Alexandros Roper, Damian Tsironis, Ioannis Byrne, Jonathan Alfakih, Khaled Monaghan, Mark |
author_sort | Demarco, Daniela Cassar |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To compare how patients with chest pain would be investigated, based on the two guidelines available for UK cardiologists, on the management of patients with stable chest pain. The UK National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guideline which was published in 2010 and the European society of cardiology (ESC) guideline published in 2013. Both guidelines utilise pre-test probability risk scores, to guide the choice of investigation. DESIGN: We undertook a large retrospective study to investigate the outcomes of stress echocardiography. SETTING: A large tertiary centre in the UK in a contemporary clinical practice. PARTICIPANTS: Two thirds of the patients in the cohort were referred from our rapid access chest pain clinics. RESULTS: We found that the NICE risk score overestimates risk by 20% compared to the ESC Risk score. We also found that based on the NICE guidelines, 44% of the patients presenting with chest pain, in this cohort, would have been investigated invasively, with diagnostic coronary angiography. Using the ESC guidelines, only 0.3% of the patients would be investigated invasively. CONCLUSION: The large discrepancy between the two guidelines can be easily reduced if NICE adopted the ESC risk score. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4641557 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46415572015-12-15 Pre-test probability risk scores and their use in contemporary management of patients with chest pain: One year stress echo cohort study Demarco, Daniela Cassar Papachristidis, Alexandros Roper, Damian Tsironis, Ioannis Byrne, Jonathan Alfakih, Khaled Monaghan, Mark JRSM Open Research Letter OBJECTIVES: To compare how patients with chest pain would be investigated, based on the two guidelines available for UK cardiologists, on the management of patients with stable chest pain. The UK National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guideline which was published in 2010 and the European society of cardiology (ESC) guideline published in 2013. Both guidelines utilise pre-test probability risk scores, to guide the choice of investigation. DESIGN: We undertook a large retrospective study to investigate the outcomes of stress echocardiography. SETTING: A large tertiary centre in the UK in a contemporary clinical practice. PARTICIPANTS: Two thirds of the patients in the cohort were referred from our rapid access chest pain clinics. RESULTS: We found that the NICE risk score overestimates risk by 20% compared to the ESC Risk score. We also found that based on the NICE guidelines, 44% of the patients presenting with chest pain, in this cohort, would have been investigated invasively, with diagnostic coronary angiography. Using the ESC guidelines, only 0.3% of the patients would be investigated invasively. CONCLUSION: The large discrepancy between the two guidelines can be easily reduced if NICE adopted the ESC risk score. SAGE Publications 2015-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4641557/ /pubmed/26673458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054270415611295 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Research Letter Demarco, Daniela Cassar Papachristidis, Alexandros Roper, Damian Tsironis, Ioannis Byrne, Jonathan Alfakih, Khaled Monaghan, Mark Pre-test probability risk scores and their use in contemporary management of patients with chest pain: One year stress echo cohort study |
title | Pre-test probability risk scores and their use in contemporary management of patients with chest pain: One year stress echo cohort study |
title_full | Pre-test probability risk scores and their use in contemporary management of patients with chest pain: One year stress echo cohort study |
title_fullStr | Pre-test probability risk scores and their use in contemporary management of patients with chest pain: One year stress echo cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Pre-test probability risk scores and their use in contemporary management of patients with chest pain: One year stress echo cohort study |
title_short | Pre-test probability risk scores and their use in contemporary management of patients with chest pain: One year stress echo cohort study |
title_sort | pre-test probability risk scores and their use in contemporary management of patients with chest pain: one year stress echo cohort study |
topic | Research Letter |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4641557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26673458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054270415611295 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT demarcodanielacassar pretestprobabilityriskscoresandtheiruseincontemporarymanagementofpatientswithchestpainoneyearstressechocohortstudy AT papachristidisalexandros pretestprobabilityriskscoresandtheiruseincontemporarymanagementofpatientswithchestpainoneyearstressechocohortstudy AT roperdamian pretestprobabilityriskscoresandtheiruseincontemporarymanagementofpatientswithchestpainoneyearstressechocohortstudy AT tsironisioannis pretestprobabilityriskscoresandtheiruseincontemporarymanagementofpatientswithchestpainoneyearstressechocohortstudy AT byrnejonathan pretestprobabilityriskscoresandtheiruseincontemporarymanagementofpatientswithchestpainoneyearstressechocohortstudy AT alfakihkhaled pretestprobabilityriskscoresandtheiruseincontemporarymanagementofpatientswithchestpainoneyearstressechocohortstudy AT monaghanmark pretestprobabilityriskscoresandtheiruseincontemporarymanagementofpatientswithchestpainoneyearstressechocohortstudy |