Cargando…

Pre-test probability risk scores and their use in contemporary management of patients with chest pain: One year stress echo cohort study

OBJECTIVES: To compare how patients with chest pain would be investigated, based on the two guidelines available for UK cardiologists, on the management of patients with stable chest pain. The UK National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guideline which was published in 2010 and the European...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Demarco, Daniela Cassar, Papachristidis, Alexandros, Roper, Damian, Tsironis, Ioannis, Byrne, Jonathan, Alfakih, Khaled, Monaghan, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4641557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26673458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054270415611295
_version_ 1782400216106795008
author Demarco, Daniela Cassar
Papachristidis, Alexandros
Roper, Damian
Tsironis, Ioannis
Byrne, Jonathan
Alfakih, Khaled
Monaghan, Mark
author_facet Demarco, Daniela Cassar
Papachristidis, Alexandros
Roper, Damian
Tsironis, Ioannis
Byrne, Jonathan
Alfakih, Khaled
Monaghan, Mark
author_sort Demarco, Daniela Cassar
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare how patients with chest pain would be investigated, based on the two guidelines available for UK cardiologists, on the management of patients with stable chest pain. The UK National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guideline which was published in 2010 and the European society of cardiology (ESC) guideline published in 2013. Both guidelines utilise pre-test probability risk scores, to guide the choice of investigation. DESIGN: We undertook a large retrospective study to investigate the outcomes of stress echocardiography. SETTING: A large tertiary centre in the UK in a contemporary clinical practice. PARTICIPANTS: Two thirds of the patients in the cohort were referred from our rapid access chest pain clinics. RESULTS: We found that the NICE risk score overestimates risk by 20% compared to the ESC Risk score. We also found that based on the NICE guidelines, 44% of the patients presenting with chest pain, in this cohort, would have been investigated invasively, with diagnostic coronary angiography. Using the ESC guidelines, only 0.3% of the patients would be investigated invasively. CONCLUSION: The large discrepancy between the two guidelines can be easily reduced if NICE adopted the ESC risk score.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4641557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46415572015-12-15 Pre-test probability risk scores and their use in contemporary management of patients with chest pain: One year stress echo cohort study Demarco, Daniela Cassar Papachristidis, Alexandros Roper, Damian Tsironis, Ioannis Byrne, Jonathan Alfakih, Khaled Monaghan, Mark JRSM Open Research Letter OBJECTIVES: To compare how patients with chest pain would be investigated, based on the two guidelines available for UK cardiologists, on the management of patients with stable chest pain. The UK National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guideline which was published in 2010 and the European society of cardiology (ESC) guideline published in 2013. Both guidelines utilise pre-test probability risk scores, to guide the choice of investigation. DESIGN: We undertook a large retrospective study to investigate the outcomes of stress echocardiography. SETTING: A large tertiary centre in the UK in a contemporary clinical practice. PARTICIPANTS: Two thirds of the patients in the cohort were referred from our rapid access chest pain clinics. RESULTS: We found that the NICE risk score overestimates risk by 20% compared to the ESC Risk score. We also found that based on the NICE guidelines, 44% of the patients presenting with chest pain, in this cohort, would have been investigated invasively, with diagnostic coronary angiography. Using the ESC guidelines, only 0.3% of the patients would be investigated invasively. CONCLUSION: The large discrepancy between the two guidelines can be easily reduced if NICE adopted the ESC risk score. SAGE Publications 2015-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4641557/ /pubmed/26673458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054270415611295 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research Letter
Demarco, Daniela Cassar
Papachristidis, Alexandros
Roper, Damian
Tsironis, Ioannis
Byrne, Jonathan
Alfakih, Khaled
Monaghan, Mark
Pre-test probability risk scores and their use in contemporary management of patients with chest pain: One year stress echo cohort study
title Pre-test probability risk scores and their use in contemporary management of patients with chest pain: One year stress echo cohort study
title_full Pre-test probability risk scores and their use in contemporary management of patients with chest pain: One year stress echo cohort study
title_fullStr Pre-test probability risk scores and their use in contemporary management of patients with chest pain: One year stress echo cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Pre-test probability risk scores and their use in contemporary management of patients with chest pain: One year stress echo cohort study
title_short Pre-test probability risk scores and their use in contemporary management of patients with chest pain: One year stress echo cohort study
title_sort pre-test probability risk scores and their use in contemporary management of patients with chest pain: one year stress echo cohort study
topic Research Letter
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4641557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26673458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054270415611295
work_keys_str_mv AT demarcodanielacassar pretestprobabilityriskscoresandtheiruseincontemporarymanagementofpatientswithchestpainoneyearstressechocohortstudy
AT papachristidisalexandros pretestprobabilityriskscoresandtheiruseincontemporarymanagementofpatientswithchestpainoneyearstressechocohortstudy
AT roperdamian pretestprobabilityriskscoresandtheiruseincontemporarymanagementofpatientswithchestpainoneyearstressechocohortstudy
AT tsironisioannis pretestprobabilityriskscoresandtheiruseincontemporarymanagementofpatientswithchestpainoneyearstressechocohortstudy
AT byrnejonathan pretestprobabilityriskscoresandtheiruseincontemporarymanagementofpatientswithchestpainoneyearstressechocohortstudy
AT alfakihkhaled pretestprobabilityriskscoresandtheiruseincontemporarymanagementofpatientswithchestpainoneyearstressechocohortstudy
AT monaghanmark pretestprobabilityriskscoresandtheiruseincontemporarymanagementofpatientswithchestpainoneyearstressechocohortstudy