Cargando…

A finite element study on stress distribution of two different attachment designs under implant supported overdenture

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate stress patterns generated within implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained by two different attachment types: ball and socket and locator attachments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Commercial CAD/CAM and finite element analysis software packages were utilize...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El-Anwar, Mohamed I., Yousief, Salah A., Soliman, Tarek A., Saleh, Mahmoud M., Omar, Wael S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4642187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26644755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2015.03.001
_version_ 1782400322755362816
author El-Anwar, Mohamed I.
Yousief, Salah A.
Soliman, Tarek A.
Saleh, Mahmoud M.
Omar, Wael S.
author_facet El-Anwar, Mohamed I.
Yousief, Salah A.
Soliman, Tarek A.
Saleh, Mahmoud M.
Omar, Wael S.
author_sort El-Anwar, Mohamed I.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate stress patterns generated within implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained by two different attachment types: ball and socket and locator attachments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Commercial CAD/CAM and finite element analysis software packages were utilized to construct two 3D finite element models for the two attachment types. Unilateral masticatory compressive loads of 50, 100, and 150 N were applied vertically to the overdentures, parallel to the longitudinal axes of the implants. Loads were directed toward the central fossa in the molar region of each overdenture, that linear static analysis was carried out to find the generated stresses and deformation on each part of the studied model. RESULTS: According to FEA results the ball attachment neck is highly stressed in comparison to the locator one. On the other hand mucosa and cortical bone received less stresses under ball and socket attachment. CONCLUSIONS: Locator and ball and socket attachments induce equivalent stresses on bone surrounding implants. Locator attachment performance was superior to that of the ball and socket attachment in the implants, nylon caps, and overdenture. Locator attachments are highly recommended and can increase the interval between successive maintenance sessions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4642187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46421872015-12-07 A finite element study on stress distribution of two different attachment designs under implant supported overdenture El-Anwar, Mohamed I. Yousief, Salah A. Soliman, Tarek A. Saleh, Mahmoud M. Omar, Wael S. Saudi Dent J Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate stress patterns generated within implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained by two different attachment types: ball and socket and locator attachments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Commercial CAD/CAM and finite element analysis software packages were utilized to construct two 3D finite element models for the two attachment types. Unilateral masticatory compressive loads of 50, 100, and 150 N were applied vertically to the overdentures, parallel to the longitudinal axes of the implants. Loads were directed toward the central fossa in the molar region of each overdenture, that linear static analysis was carried out to find the generated stresses and deformation on each part of the studied model. RESULTS: According to FEA results the ball attachment neck is highly stressed in comparison to the locator one. On the other hand mucosa and cortical bone received less stresses under ball and socket attachment. CONCLUSIONS: Locator and ball and socket attachments induce equivalent stresses on bone surrounding implants. Locator attachment performance was superior to that of the ball and socket attachment in the implants, nylon caps, and overdenture. Locator attachments are highly recommended and can increase the interval between successive maintenance sessions. Elsevier 2015-10 2015-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4642187/ /pubmed/26644755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2015.03.001 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
El-Anwar, Mohamed I.
Yousief, Salah A.
Soliman, Tarek A.
Saleh, Mahmoud M.
Omar, Wael S.
A finite element study on stress distribution of two different attachment designs under implant supported overdenture
title A finite element study on stress distribution of two different attachment designs under implant supported overdenture
title_full A finite element study on stress distribution of two different attachment designs under implant supported overdenture
title_fullStr A finite element study on stress distribution of two different attachment designs under implant supported overdenture
title_full_unstemmed A finite element study on stress distribution of two different attachment designs under implant supported overdenture
title_short A finite element study on stress distribution of two different attachment designs under implant supported overdenture
title_sort finite element study on stress distribution of two different attachment designs under implant supported overdenture
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4642187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26644755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2015.03.001
work_keys_str_mv AT elanwarmohamedi afiniteelementstudyonstressdistributionoftwodifferentattachmentdesignsunderimplantsupportedoverdenture
AT yousiefsalaha afiniteelementstudyonstressdistributionoftwodifferentattachmentdesignsunderimplantsupportedoverdenture
AT solimantareka afiniteelementstudyonstressdistributionoftwodifferentattachmentdesignsunderimplantsupportedoverdenture
AT salehmahmoudm afiniteelementstudyonstressdistributionoftwodifferentattachmentdesignsunderimplantsupportedoverdenture
AT omarwaels afiniteelementstudyonstressdistributionoftwodifferentattachmentdesignsunderimplantsupportedoverdenture
AT elanwarmohamedi finiteelementstudyonstressdistributionoftwodifferentattachmentdesignsunderimplantsupportedoverdenture
AT yousiefsalaha finiteelementstudyonstressdistributionoftwodifferentattachmentdesignsunderimplantsupportedoverdenture
AT solimantareka finiteelementstudyonstressdistributionoftwodifferentattachmentdesignsunderimplantsupportedoverdenture
AT salehmahmoudm finiteelementstudyonstressdistributionoftwodifferentattachmentdesignsunderimplantsupportedoverdenture
AT omarwaels finiteelementstudyonstressdistributionoftwodifferentattachmentdesignsunderimplantsupportedoverdenture