Cargando…

A diagnostic tool for malaria based on computer software

Nowadays, the gold standard method for malaria diagnosis is a staining of thick and thin blood film examined by expert laboratorists. It requires well-trained laboratorists, which is a time consuming task, and is un-automated protocol. For this study, Maladiag Software was developed to predict malar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kotepui, Manas, Uthaisar, Kwuntida, Phunphuech, Bhukdee, Phiwklam, Nuoil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4642325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26559606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16656
_version_ 1782400343730028544
author Kotepui, Manas
Uthaisar, Kwuntida
Phunphuech, Bhukdee
Phiwklam, Nuoil
author_facet Kotepui, Manas
Uthaisar, Kwuntida
Phunphuech, Bhukdee
Phiwklam, Nuoil
author_sort Kotepui, Manas
collection PubMed
description Nowadays, the gold standard method for malaria diagnosis is a staining of thick and thin blood film examined by expert laboratorists. It requires well-trained laboratorists, which is a time consuming task, and is un-automated protocol. For this study, Maladiag Software was developed to predict malaria infection in suspected malaria patients. The demographic data of patients, examination for malaria parasites, and complete blood count (CBC) profiles were analyzed. Binary logistic regression was used to create the equation for the malaria diagnosis. The diagnostic parameters of the equation were tested on 4,985 samples (703 infected and 4,282 control samples). The equation indicated 81.2% sensitivity and 80.3% specificity for predicting infection of malaria. The positive likelihood and negative likelihood ratio were 4.12 (95% CI = 4.01–4.23) and 0.23 (95% CI = 0.22–0.25), respectively. This parameter also had odds ratios (P value < 0.0001, OR = 17.6, 95% CI = 16.0–19.3). The equation can predict malaria infection after adjust for age, gender, nationality, monocyte (%), platelet count, neutrophil (%), lymphocyte (%), and the RBC count of patients. The diagnostic accuracy was 0.877 (Area under curve, AUC) (95% CI = 0.871–0.883). The system, when used in combination with other clinical and microscopy methods, might improve malaria diagnoses and enhance prompt treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4642325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46423252015-11-20 A diagnostic tool for malaria based on computer software Kotepui, Manas Uthaisar, Kwuntida Phunphuech, Bhukdee Phiwklam, Nuoil Sci Rep Article Nowadays, the gold standard method for malaria diagnosis is a staining of thick and thin blood film examined by expert laboratorists. It requires well-trained laboratorists, which is a time consuming task, and is un-automated protocol. For this study, Maladiag Software was developed to predict malaria infection in suspected malaria patients. The demographic data of patients, examination for malaria parasites, and complete blood count (CBC) profiles were analyzed. Binary logistic regression was used to create the equation for the malaria diagnosis. The diagnostic parameters of the equation were tested on 4,985 samples (703 infected and 4,282 control samples). The equation indicated 81.2% sensitivity and 80.3% specificity for predicting infection of malaria. The positive likelihood and negative likelihood ratio were 4.12 (95% CI = 4.01–4.23) and 0.23 (95% CI = 0.22–0.25), respectively. This parameter also had odds ratios (P value < 0.0001, OR = 17.6, 95% CI = 16.0–19.3). The equation can predict malaria infection after adjust for age, gender, nationality, monocyte (%), platelet count, neutrophil (%), lymphocyte (%), and the RBC count of patients. The diagnostic accuracy was 0.877 (Area under curve, AUC) (95% CI = 0.871–0.883). The system, when used in combination with other clinical and microscopy methods, might improve malaria diagnoses and enhance prompt treatment. Nature Publishing Group 2015-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4642325/ /pubmed/26559606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16656 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Kotepui, Manas
Uthaisar, Kwuntida
Phunphuech, Bhukdee
Phiwklam, Nuoil
A diagnostic tool for malaria based on computer software
title A diagnostic tool for malaria based on computer software
title_full A diagnostic tool for malaria based on computer software
title_fullStr A diagnostic tool for malaria based on computer software
title_full_unstemmed A diagnostic tool for malaria based on computer software
title_short A diagnostic tool for malaria based on computer software
title_sort diagnostic tool for malaria based on computer software
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4642325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26559606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16656
work_keys_str_mv AT kotepuimanas adiagnostictoolformalariabasedoncomputersoftware
AT uthaisarkwuntida adiagnostictoolformalariabasedoncomputersoftware
AT phunphuechbhukdee adiagnostictoolformalariabasedoncomputersoftware
AT phiwklamnuoil adiagnostictoolformalariabasedoncomputersoftware
AT kotepuimanas diagnostictoolformalariabasedoncomputersoftware
AT uthaisarkwuntida diagnostictoolformalariabasedoncomputersoftware
AT phunphuechbhukdee diagnostictoolformalariabasedoncomputersoftware
AT phiwklamnuoil diagnostictoolformalariabasedoncomputersoftware