Cargando…

Is the Motor System Necessary for Processing Action and Abstract Emotion Words? Evidence from Focal Brain Lesions

Neuroimaging and neuropsychological experiments suggest that modality-preferential cortices, including motor- and somatosensory areas, contribute to the semantic processing of action related concrete words. Still, a possible role of sensorimotor areas in processing abstract meaning remains under deb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dreyer, Felix R., Frey, Dietmar, Arana, Sophie, von Saldern, Sarah, Picht, Thomas, Vajkoczy, Peter, Pulvermüller, Friedemann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4642355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26617535
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01661
_version_ 1782400349596811264
author Dreyer, Felix R.
Frey, Dietmar
Arana, Sophie
von Saldern, Sarah
Picht, Thomas
Vajkoczy, Peter
Pulvermüller, Friedemann
author_facet Dreyer, Felix R.
Frey, Dietmar
Arana, Sophie
von Saldern, Sarah
Picht, Thomas
Vajkoczy, Peter
Pulvermüller, Friedemann
author_sort Dreyer, Felix R.
collection PubMed
description Neuroimaging and neuropsychological experiments suggest that modality-preferential cortices, including motor- and somatosensory areas, contribute to the semantic processing of action related concrete words. Still, a possible role of sensorimotor areas in processing abstract meaning remains under debate. Recent fMRI studies indicate an involvement of the left sensorimotor cortex in the processing of abstract-emotional words (e.g., “love”) which resembles activation patterns seen for action words. But are the activated areas indeed necessary for processing action-related and abstract words? The current study now investigates word processing in two patients suffering from focal brain lesion in the left frontocentral motor system. A speeded Lexical Decision Task on meticulously matched word groups showed that the recognition of nouns from different semantic categories – related to food, animals, tools, and abstract-emotional concepts – was differentially affected. Whereas patient HS with a lesion in dorsolateral central sensorimotor systems next to the hand area showed a category-specific deficit in recognizing tool words, patient CA suffering from lesion centered in the left supplementary motor area was primarily impaired in abstract-emotional word processing. These results point to a causal role of the motor cortex in the semantic processing of both action-related object concepts and abstract-emotional concepts and therefore suggest that the motor areas previously found active in action-related and abstract word processing can serve a meaning-specific necessary role in word recognition. The category-specific nature of the observed dissociations is difficult to reconcile with the idea that sensorimotor systems are somehow peripheral or ‘epiphenomenal’ to meaning and concept processing. Rather, our results are consistent with the claim that cognition is grounded in action and perception and based on distributed action perception circuits reaching into modality-preferential cortex.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4642355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46423552015-11-27 Is the Motor System Necessary for Processing Action and Abstract Emotion Words? Evidence from Focal Brain Lesions Dreyer, Felix R. Frey, Dietmar Arana, Sophie von Saldern, Sarah Picht, Thomas Vajkoczy, Peter Pulvermüller, Friedemann Front Psychol Psychology Neuroimaging and neuropsychological experiments suggest that modality-preferential cortices, including motor- and somatosensory areas, contribute to the semantic processing of action related concrete words. Still, a possible role of sensorimotor areas in processing abstract meaning remains under debate. Recent fMRI studies indicate an involvement of the left sensorimotor cortex in the processing of abstract-emotional words (e.g., “love”) which resembles activation patterns seen for action words. But are the activated areas indeed necessary for processing action-related and abstract words? The current study now investigates word processing in two patients suffering from focal brain lesion in the left frontocentral motor system. A speeded Lexical Decision Task on meticulously matched word groups showed that the recognition of nouns from different semantic categories – related to food, animals, tools, and abstract-emotional concepts – was differentially affected. Whereas patient HS with a lesion in dorsolateral central sensorimotor systems next to the hand area showed a category-specific deficit in recognizing tool words, patient CA suffering from lesion centered in the left supplementary motor area was primarily impaired in abstract-emotional word processing. These results point to a causal role of the motor cortex in the semantic processing of both action-related object concepts and abstract-emotional concepts and therefore suggest that the motor areas previously found active in action-related and abstract word processing can serve a meaning-specific necessary role in word recognition. The category-specific nature of the observed dissociations is difficult to reconcile with the idea that sensorimotor systems are somehow peripheral or ‘epiphenomenal’ to meaning and concept processing. Rather, our results are consistent with the claim that cognition is grounded in action and perception and based on distributed action perception circuits reaching into modality-preferential cortex. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4642355/ /pubmed/26617535 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01661 Text en Copyright © 2015 Dreyer, Frey, Arana, von Saldern, Picht, Vajkoczy and Pulvermüller. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Dreyer, Felix R.
Frey, Dietmar
Arana, Sophie
von Saldern, Sarah
Picht, Thomas
Vajkoczy, Peter
Pulvermüller, Friedemann
Is the Motor System Necessary for Processing Action and Abstract Emotion Words? Evidence from Focal Brain Lesions
title Is the Motor System Necessary for Processing Action and Abstract Emotion Words? Evidence from Focal Brain Lesions
title_full Is the Motor System Necessary for Processing Action and Abstract Emotion Words? Evidence from Focal Brain Lesions
title_fullStr Is the Motor System Necessary for Processing Action and Abstract Emotion Words? Evidence from Focal Brain Lesions
title_full_unstemmed Is the Motor System Necessary for Processing Action and Abstract Emotion Words? Evidence from Focal Brain Lesions
title_short Is the Motor System Necessary for Processing Action and Abstract Emotion Words? Evidence from Focal Brain Lesions
title_sort is the motor system necessary for processing action and abstract emotion words? evidence from focal brain lesions
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4642355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26617535
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01661
work_keys_str_mv AT dreyerfelixr isthemotorsystemnecessaryforprocessingactionandabstractemotionwordsevidencefromfocalbrainlesions
AT freydietmar isthemotorsystemnecessaryforprocessingactionandabstractemotionwordsevidencefromfocalbrainlesions
AT aranasophie isthemotorsystemnecessaryforprocessingactionandabstractemotionwordsevidencefromfocalbrainlesions
AT vonsaldernsarah isthemotorsystemnecessaryforprocessingactionandabstractemotionwordsevidencefromfocalbrainlesions
AT pichtthomas isthemotorsystemnecessaryforprocessingactionandabstractemotionwordsevidencefromfocalbrainlesions
AT vajkoczypeter isthemotorsystemnecessaryforprocessingactionandabstractemotionwordsevidencefromfocalbrainlesions
AT pulvermullerfriedemann isthemotorsystemnecessaryforprocessingactionandabstractemotionwordsevidencefromfocalbrainlesions