Cargando…
The Diagnostic Validity and Reliability of an Internet-Based Clinical Assessment Program for Mental Disorders
BACKGROUND: Internet-based assessment has the potential to assist with the diagnosis of mental health disorders and overcome the barriers associated with traditional services (eg, cost, stigma, distance). Further to existing online screening programs available, there is an opportunity to deliver mor...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4642400/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26392066 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4195 |
_version_ | 1782400359443988480 |
---|---|
author | Nguyen, David Phong Klein, Britt Meyer, Denny Austin, David William Abbott, Jo-Anne M |
author_facet | Nguyen, David Phong Klein, Britt Meyer, Denny Austin, David William Abbott, Jo-Anne M |
author_sort | Nguyen, David Phong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Internet-based assessment has the potential to assist with the diagnosis of mental health disorders and overcome the barriers associated with traditional services (eg, cost, stigma, distance). Further to existing online screening programs available, there is an opportunity to deliver more comprehensive and accurate diagnostic tools to supplement the assessment and treatment of mental health disorders. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the diagnostic criterion validity and test-retest reliability of the electronic Psychological Assessment System (e-PASS), an online, self-report, multidisorder, clinical assessment and referral system. METHODS: Participants were 616 adults residing in Australia, recruited online, and representing prospective e-PASS users. Following e-PASS completion, 158 participants underwent a telephone-administered structured clinical interview and 39 participants repeated the e-PASS within 25 days of initial completion. RESULTS: With structured clinical interview results serving as the gold standard, diagnostic agreement with the e-PASS varied considerably from fair (eg, generalized anxiety disorder: κ=.37) to strong (eg, panic disorder: κ=.62). Although the e-PASS’ sensitivity also varied (0.43-0.86) the specificity was generally high (0.68-1.00). The e-PASS sensitivity generally improved when reducing the e-PASS threshold to a subclinical result. Test-retest reliability ranged from moderate (eg, specific phobia: κ=.54) to substantial (eg, bulimia nervosa: κ=.87). CONCLUSIONS: The e-PASS produces reliable diagnostic results and performs generally well in excluding mental disorders, although at the expense of sensitivity. For screening purposes, the e-PASS subclinical result generally appears better than a clinical result as a diagnostic indicator. Further development and evaluation is needed to support the use of online diagnostic assessment programs for mental disorders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN121611000704998; http://www.anzctr.org.au/trial_view.aspx?ID=336143 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/618r3wvOG). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4642400 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | JMIR Publications Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46424002016-01-12 The Diagnostic Validity and Reliability of an Internet-Based Clinical Assessment Program for Mental Disorders Nguyen, David Phong Klein, Britt Meyer, Denny Austin, David William Abbott, Jo-Anne M J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Internet-based assessment has the potential to assist with the diagnosis of mental health disorders and overcome the barriers associated with traditional services (eg, cost, stigma, distance). Further to existing online screening programs available, there is an opportunity to deliver more comprehensive and accurate diagnostic tools to supplement the assessment and treatment of mental health disorders. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the diagnostic criterion validity and test-retest reliability of the electronic Psychological Assessment System (e-PASS), an online, self-report, multidisorder, clinical assessment and referral system. METHODS: Participants were 616 adults residing in Australia, recruited online, and representing prospective e-PASS users. Following e-PASS completion, 158 participants underwent a telephone-administered structured clinical interview and 39 participants repeated the e-PASS within 25 days of initial completion. RESULTS: With structured clinical interview results serving as the gold standard, diagnostic agreement with the e-PASS varied considerably from fair (eg, generalized anxiety disorder: κ=.37) to strong (eg, panic disorder: κ=.62). Although the e-PASS’ sensitivity also varied (0.43-0.86) the specificity was generally high (0.68-1.00). The e-PASS sensitivity generally improved when reducing the e-PASS threshold to a subclinical result. Test-retest reliability ranged from moderate (eg, specific phobia: κ=.54) to substantial (eg, bulimia nervosa: κ=.87). CONCLUSIONS: The e-PASS produces reliable diagnostic results and performs generally well in excluding mental disorders, although at the expense of sensitivity. For screening purposes, the e-PASS subclinical result generally appears better than a clinical result as a diagnostic indicator. Further development and evaluation is needed to support the use of online diagnostic assessment programs for mental disorders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN121611000704998; http://www.anzctr.org.au/trial_view.aspx?ID=336143 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/618r3wvOG). JMIR Publications Inc. 2015-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4642400/ /pubmed/26392066 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4195 Text en ©David Phong Nguyen, Britt Klein, Denny Meyer, David William Austin, Jo-Anne M Abbott. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 21.09.2015. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Nguyen, David Phong Klein, Britt Meyer, Denny Austin, David William Abbott, Jo-Anne M The Diagnostic Validity and Reliability of an Internet-Based Clinical Assessment Program for Mental Disorders |
title | The Diagnostic Validity and Reliability of an Internet-Based Clinical Assessment Program for Mental Disorders |
title_full | The Diagnostic Validity and Reliability of an Internet-Based Clinical Assessment Program for Mental Disorders |
title_fullStr | The Diagnostic Validity and Reliability of an Internet-Based Clinical Assessment Program for Mental Disorders |
title_full_unstemmed | The Diagnostic Validity and Reliability of an Internet-Based Clinical Assessment Program for Mental Disorders |
title_short | The Diagnostic Validity and Reliability of an Internet-Based Clinical Assessment Program for Mental Disorders |
title_sort | diagnostic validity and reliability of an internet-based clinical assessment program for mental disorders |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4642400/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26392066 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4195 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nguyendavidphong thediagnosticvalidityandreliabilityofaninternetbasedclinicalassessmentprogramformentaldisorders AT kleinbritt thediagnosticvalidityandreliabilityofaninternetbasedclinicalassessmentprogramformentaldisorders AT meyerdenny thediagnosticvalidityandreliabilityofaninternetbasedclinicalassessmentprogramformentaldisorders AT austindavidwilliam thediagnosticvalidityandreliabilityofaninternetbasedclinicalassessmentprogramformentaldisorders AT abbottjoannem thediagnosticvalidityandreliabilityofaninternetbasedclinicalassessmentprogramformentaldisorders AT nguyendavidphong diagnosticvalidityandreliabilityofaninternetbasedclinicalassessmentprogramformentaldisorders AT kleinbritt diagnosticvalidityandreliabilityofaninternetbasedclinicalassessmentprogramformentaldisorders AT meyerdenny diagnosticvalidityandreliabilityofaninternetbasedclinicalassessmentprogramformentaldisorders AT austindavidwilliam diagnosticvalidityandreliabilityofaninternetbasedclinicalassessmentprogramformentaldisorders AT abbottjoannem diagnosticvalidityandreliabilityofaninternetbasedclinicalassessmentprogramformentaldisorders |