Cargando…

The Diagnostic Validity and Reliability of an Internet-Based Clinical Assessment Program for Mental Disorders

BACKGROUND: Internet-based assessment has the potential to assist with the diagnosis of mental health disorders and overcome the barriers associated with traditional services (eg, cost, stigma, distance). Further to existing online screening programs available, there is an opportunity to deliver mor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nguyen, David Phong, Klein, Britt, Meyer, Denny, Austin, David William, Abbott, Jo-Anne M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4642400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26392066
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4195
_version_ 1782400359443988480
author Nguyen, David Phong
Klein, Britt
Meyer, Denny
Austin, David William
Abbott, Jo-Anne M
author_facet Nguyen, David Phong
Klein, Britt
Meyer, Denny
Austin, David William
Abbott, Jo-Anne M
author_sort Nguyen, David Phong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Internet-based assessment has the potential to assist with the diagnosis of mental health disorders and overcome the barriers associated with traditional services (eg, cost, stigma, distance). Further to existing online screening programs available, there is an opportunity to deliver more comprehensive and accurate diagnostic tools to supplement the assessment and treatment of mental health disorders. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the diagnostic criterion validity and test-retest reliability of the electronic Psychological Assessment System (e-PASS), an online, self-report, multidisorder, clinical assessment and referral system. METHODS: Participants were 616 adults residing in Australia, recruited online, and representing prospective e-PASS users. Following e-PASS completion, 158 participants underwent a telephone-administered structured clinical interview and 39 participants repeated the e-PASS within 25 days of initial completion. RESULTS: With structured clinical interview results serving as the gold standard, diagnostic agreement with the e-PASS varied considerably from fair (eg, generalized anxiety disorder: κ=.37) to strong (eg, panic disorder: κ=.62). Although the e-PASS’ sensitivity also varied (0.43-0.86) the specificity was generally high (0.68-1.00). The e-PASS sensitivity generally improved when reducing the e-PASS threshold to a subclinical result. Test-retest reliability ranged from moderate (eg, specific phobia: κ=.54) to substantial (eg, bulimia nervosa: κ=.87). CONCLUSIONS: The e-PASS produces reliable diagnostic results and performs generally well in excluding mental disorders, although at the expense of sensitivity. For screening purposes, the e-PASS subclinical result generally appears better than a clinical result as a diagnostic indicator. Further development and evaluation is needed to support the use of online diagnostic assessment programs for mental disorders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN121611000704998; http://www.anzctr.org.au/trial_view.aspx?ID=336143 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/618r3wvOG).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4642400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher JMIR Publications Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46424002016-01-12 The Diagnostic Validity and Reliability of an Internet-Based Clinical Assessment Program for Mental Disorders Nguyen, David Phong Klein, Britt Meyer, Denny Austin, David William Abbott, Jo-Anne M J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Internet-based assessment has the potential to assist with the diagnosis of mental health disorders and overcome the barriers associated with traditional services (eg, cost, stigma, distance). Further to existing online screening programs available, there is an opportunity to deliver more comprehensive and accurate diagnostic tools to supplement the assessment and treatment of mental health disorders. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the diagnostic criterion validity and test-retest reliability of the electronic Psychological Assessment System (e-PASS), an online, self-report, multidisorder, clinical assessment and referral system. METHODS: Participants were 616 adults residing in Australia, recruited online, and representing prospective e-PASS users. Following e-PASS completion, 158 participants underwent a telephone-administered structured clinical interview and 39 participants repeated the e-PASS within 25 days of initial completion. RESULTS: With structured clinical interview results serving as the gold standard, diagnostic agreement with the e-PASS varied considerably from fair (eg, generalized anxiety disorder: κ=.37) to strong (eg, panic disorder: κ=.62). Although the e-PASS’ sensitivity also varied (0.43-0.86) the specificity was generally high (0.68-1.00). The e-PASS sensitivity generally improved when reducing the e-PASS threshold to a subclinical result. Test-retest reliability ranged from moderate (eg, specific phobia: κ=.54) to substantial (eg, bulimia nervosa: κ=.87). CONCLUSIONS: The e-PASS produces reliable diagnostic results and performs generally well in excluding mental disorders, although at the expense of sensitivity. For screening purposes, the e-PASS subclinical result generally appears better than a clinical result as a diagnostic indicator. Further development and evaluation is needed to support the use of online diagnostic assessment programs for mental disorders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN121611000704998; http://www.anzctr.org.au/trial_view.aspx?ID=336143 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/618r3wvOG). JMIR Publications Inc. 2015-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4642400/ /pubmed/26392066 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4195 Text en ©David Phong Nguyen, Britt Klein, Denny Meyer, David William Austin, Jo-Anne M Abbott. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 21.09.2015. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Nguyen, David Phong
Klein, Britt
Meyer, Denny
Austin, David William
Abbott, Jo-Anne M
The Diagnostic Validity and Reliability of an Internet-Based Clinical Assessment Program for Mental Disorders
title The Diagnostic Validity and Reliability of an Internet-Based Clinical Assessment Program for Mental Disorders
title_full The Diagnostic Validity and Reliability of an Internet-Based Clinical Assessment Program for Mental Disorders
title_fullStr The Diagnostic Validity and Reliability of an Internet-Based Clinical Assessment Program for Mental Disorders
title_full_unstemmed The Diagnostic Validity and Reliability of an Internet-Based Clinical Assessment Program for Mental Disorders
title_short The Diagnostic Validity and Reliability of an Internet-Based Clinical Assessment Program for Mental Disorders
title_sort diagnostic validity and reliability of an internet-based clinical assessment program for mental disorders
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4642400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26392066
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4195
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyendavidphong thediagnosticvalidityandreliabilityofaninternetbasedclinicalassessmentprogramformentaldisorders
AT kleinbritt thediagnosticvalidityandreliabilityofaninternetbasedclinicalassessmentprogramformentaldisorders
AT meyerdenny thediagnosticvalidityandreliabilityofaninternetbasedclinicalassessmentprogramformentaldisorders
AT austindavidwilliam thediagnosticvalidityandreliabilityofaninternetbasedclinicalassessmentprogramformentaldisorders
AT abbottjoannem thediagnosticvalidityandreliabilityofaninternetbasedclinicalassessmentprogramformentaldisorders
AT nguyendavidphong diagnosticvalidityandreliabilityofaninternetbasedclinicalassessmentprogramformentaldisorders
AT kleinbritt diagnosticvalidityandreliabilityofaninternetbasedclinicalassessmentprogramformentaldisorders
AT meyerdenny diagnosticvalidityandreliabilityofaninternetbasedclinicalassessmentprogramformentaldisorders
AT austindavidwilliam diagnosticvalidityandreliabilityofaninternetbasedclinicalassessmentprogramformentaldisorders
AT abbottjoannem diagnosticvalidityandreliabilityofaninternetbasedclinicalassessmentprogramformentaldisorders