Cargando…

The effectiveness of interventions in supporting self-management of informal caregivers of people with dementia; a systematic meta review

BACKGROUND: Informal caregivers of people with dementia are challenged in managing the consequences of dementia in daily life. The objective of this meta-review was to synthesize evidence from previous systematic reviews about professional self-management support interventions for this group. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huis in het Veld, Judith G., Verkaik, Renate, Mistiaen, Patriek, van Meijel, Berno, Francke, Anneke L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4642777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26561236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0145-6
_version_ 1782400419883909120
author Huis in het Veld, Judith G.
Verkaik, Renate
Mistiaen, Patriek
van Meijel, Berno
Francke, Anneke L.
author_facet Huis in het Veld, Judith G.
Verkaik, Renate
Mistiaen, Patriek
van Meijel, Berno
Francke, Anneke L.
author_sort Huis in het Veld, Judith G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Informal caregivers of people with dementia are challenged in managing the consequences of dementia in daily life. The objective of this meta-review was to synthesize evidence from previous systematic reviews about professional self-management support interventions for this group. METHODS: In March 2014, searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase and PsycINFO. The PRISMA Statement was followed. Interventions were grouped using Martin’s targets of self-management, covering 5 targets: relationship with family, maintaining an active lifestyle, psychological wellbeing, techniques to cope with memory changes and information about dementia. Using an evidence synthesis, the outcomes from the included interventions were synthesized and conclusions were drawn about the level of evidence for the effectiveness of interventions within each target. RESULTS: Ten high-quality systematic reviews were selected. Evidence exists for the effectiveness of professional self-management support interventions targeting psychological wellbeing on stress and social outcomes of informal caregivers. In addition, evidence exists for the effectiveness of interventions targeting information on ability/knowledge. Limited evidence was found for the effectiveness of interventions targeting techniques to cope with memory change on coping skills and mood, and for interventions targeting information on the outcomes sense of competence and decision-making confidence of informal caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: Scientific evidence exists for the effectiveness of a number of professional self-management support interventions targeting psychological wellbeing and information. Health care professionals could take account of the fact that psycho-education was integrated in most of the self-management support interventions that were found to be effective in this meta-review. Furthermore, longer and more intensive interventions were associated with greater effects. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12877-015-0145-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4642777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46427772015-11-13 The effectiveness of interventions in supporting self-management of informal caregivers of people with dementia; a systematic meta review Huis in het Veld, Judith G. Verkaik, Renate Mistiaen, Patriek van Meijel, Berno Francke, Anneke L. BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Informal caregivers of people with dementia are challenged in managing the consequences of dementia in daily life. The objective of this meta-review was to synthesize evidence from previous systematic reviews about professional self-management support interventions for this group. METHODS: In March 2014, searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase and PsycINFO. The PRISMA Statement was followed. Interventions were grouped using Martin’s targets of self-management, covering 5 targets: relationship with family, maintaining an active lifestyle, psychological wellbeing, techniques to cope with memory changes and information about dementia. Using an evidence synthesis, the outcomes from the included interventions were synthesized and conclusions were drawn about the level of evidence for the effectiveness of interventions within each target. RESULTS: Ten high-quality systematic reviews were selected. Evidence exists for the effectiveness of professional self-management support interventions targeting psychological wellbeing on stress and social outcomes of informal caregivers. In addition, evidence exists for the effectiveness of interventions targeting information on ability/knowledge. Limited evidence was found for the effectiveness of interventions targeting techniques to cope with memory change on coping skills and mood, and for interventions targeting information on the outcomes sense of competence and decision-making confidence of informal caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: Scientific evidence exists for the effectiveness of a number of professional self-management support interventions targeting psychological wellbeing and information. Health care professionals could take account of the fact that psycho-education was integrated in most of the self-management support interventions that were found to be effective in this meta-review. Furthermore, longer and more intensive interventions were associated with greater effects. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12877-015-0145-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4642777/ /pubmed/26561236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0145-6 Text en © Huis in het Veld et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Huis in het Veld, Judith G.
Verkaik, Renate
Mistiaen, Patriek
van Meijel, Berno
Francke, Anneke L.
The effectiveness of interventions in supporting self-management of informal caregivers of people with dementia; a systematic meta review
title The effectiveness of interventions in supporting self-management of informal caregivers of people with dementia; a systematic meta review
title_full The effectiveness of interventions in supporting self-management of informal caregivers of people with dementia; a systematic meta review
title_fullStr The effectiveness of interventions in supporting self-management of informal caregivers of people with dementia; a systematic meta review
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of interventions in supporting self-management of informal caregivers of people with dementia; a systematic meta review
title_short The effectiveness of interventions in supporting self-management of informal caregivers of people with dementia; a systematic meta review
title_sort effectiveness of interventions in supporting self-management of informal caregivers of people with dementia; a systematic meta review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4642777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26561236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0145-6
work_keys_str_mv AT huisinhetveldjudithg theeffectivenessofinterventionsinsupportingselfmanagementofinformalcaregiversofpeoplewithdementiaasystematicmetareview
AT verkaikrenate theeffectivenessofinterventionsinsupportingselfmanagementofinformalcaregiversofpeoplewithdementiaasystematicmetareview
AT mistiaenpatriek theeffectivenessofinterventionsinsupportingselfmanagementofinformalcaregiversofpeoplewithdementiaasystematicmetareview
AT vanmeijelberno theeffectivenessofinterventionsinsupportingselfmanagementofinformalcaregiversofpeoplewithdementiaasystematicmetareview
AT franckeannekel theeffectivenessofinterventionsinsupportingselfmanagementofinformalcaregiversofpeoplewithdementiaasystematicmetareview
AT huisinhetveldjudithg effectivenessofinterventionsinsupportingselfmanagementofinformalcaregiversofpeoplewithdementiaasystematicmetareview
AT verkaikrenate effectivenessofinterventionsinsupportingselfmanagementofinformalcaregiversofpeoplewithdementiaasystematicmetareview
AT mistiaenpatriek effectivenessofinterventionsinsupportingselfmanagementofinformalcaregiversofpeoplewithdementiaasystematicmetareview
AT vanmeijelberno effectivenessofinterventionsinsupportingselfmanagementofinformalcaregiversofpeoplewithdementiaasystematicmetareview
AT franckeannekel effectivenessofinterventionsinsupportingselfmanagementofinformalcaregiversofpeoplewithdementiaasystematicmetareview