Cargando…
Comparative phylogeography of endemic Azorean arthropods
BACKGROUND: For a remote oceanic archipelago of up to 8 Myr age, the Azores have a comparatively low level of endemism. We present an analysis of phylogeographic patterns of endemic Azorean island arthropods aimed at testing patterns of diversification in relation to the ontogeny of the archipelago,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4642780/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26559388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-015-0523-x |
_version_ | 1782400420552900608 |
---|---|
author | Parmakelis, Aristeidis Rigal, François Mourikis, Thanos Balanika, Katerina Terzopoulou, Sofia Rego, Carla Amorim, Isabel R. Crespo, Luís Pereira, Fernando Triantis, Kostas A. Whittaker, Robert J. Borges, Paulo A. V. |
author_facet | Parmakelis, Aristeidis Rigal, François Mourikis, Thanos Balanika, Katerina Terzopoulou, Sofia Rego, Carla Amorim, Isabel R. Crespo, Luís Pereira, Fernando Triantis, Kostas A. Whittaker, Robert J. Borges, Paulo A. V. |
author_sort | Parmakelis, Aristeidis |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: For a remote oceanic archipelago of up to 8 Myr age, the Azores have a comparatively low level of endemism. We present an analysis of phylogeographic patterns of endemic Azorean island arthropods aimed at testing patterns of diversification in relation to the ontogeny of the archipelago, in order to distinguish between alternative models of evolutionary dynamics on islands. We collected individuals of six species (representing Araneae, Hemiptera and Coleoptera) from 16 forest fragments from 7 islands. Using three mtDNA markers, we analysed the distribution of genetic diversity within and between islands, inferred the differentiation time-frames and investigated the inter-island migration routes and colonization patterns. RESULTS: Each species exhibited very low levels of mtDNA divergence, both within and between islands. The two oldest islands were not strongly involved in the diffusion of genetic diversity within the archipelago. The most haplotype-rich islands varied according to species but the younger, central islands contributed the most to haplotype diversity. Colonization events both in concordance with and in contradiction to an inter-island progression rule were inferred, while a non-intuitive pattern of colonization from western to eastern islands was also inferred. CONCLUSIONS: The geological development of the Azores has followed a less tidy progression compared to classic hotspot archipelagos, and this is reflected in our findings. The study species appear to have been differentiating within the Azores for <2 Myr, a fraction of the apparent life span of the archipelago, which may indicate that extinction events linked to active volcanism have played an important role. Assuming that after each extinction event, colonization was initiated from a nearby island hosting derived haplotypes, the apparent age of species diversification in the archipelago would be moved closer to the present after each extinction–recolonization cycle. Exploiting these ideas, we propose a general model for future testing. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12862-015-0523-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4642780 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46427802015-11-13 Comparative phylogeography of endemic Azorean arthropods Parmakelis, Aristeidis Rigal, François Mourikis, Thanos Balanika, Katerina Terzopoulou, Sofia Rego, Carla Amorim, Isabel R. Crespo, Luís Pereira, Fernando Triantis, Kostas A. Whittaker, Robert J. Borges, Paulo A. V. BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: For a remote oceanic archipelago of up to 8 Myr age, the Azores have a comparatively low level of endemism. We present an analysis of phylogeographic patterns of endemic Azorean island arthropods aimed at testing patterns of diversification in relation to the ontogeny of the archipelago, in order to distinguish between alternative models of evolutionary dynamics on islands. We collected individuals of six species (representing Araneae, Hemiptera and Coleoptera) from 16 forest fragments from 7 islands. Using three mtDNA markers, we analysed the distribution of genetic diversity within and between islands, inferred the differentiation time-frames and investigated the inter-island migration routes and colonization patterns. RESULTS: Each species exhibited very low levels of mtDNA divergence, both within and between islands. The two oldest islands were not strongly involved in the diffusion of genetic diversity within the archipelago. The most haplotype-rich islands varied according to species but the younger, central islands contributed the most to haplotype diversity. Colonization events both in concordance with and in contradiction to an inter-island progression rule were inferred, while a non-intuitive pattern of colonization from western to eastern islands was also inferred. CONCLUSIONS: The geological development of the Azores has followed a less tidy progression compared to classic hotspot archipelagos, and this is reflected in our findings. The study species appear to have been differentiating within the Azores for <2 Myr, a fraction of the apparent life span of the archipelago, which may indicate that extinction events linked to active volcanism have played an important role. Assuming that after each extinction event, colonization was initiated from a nearby island hosting derived haplotypes, the apparent age of species diversification in the archipelago would be moved closer to the present after each extinction–recolonization cycle. Exploiting these ideas, we propose a general model for future testing. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12862-015-0523-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4642780/ /pubmed/26559388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-015-0523-x Text en © Parmakelis et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Parmakelis, Aristeidis Rigal, François Mourikis, Thanos Balanika, Katerina Terzopoulou, Sofia Rego, Carla Amorim, Isabel R. Crespo, Luís Pereira, Fernando Triantis, Kostas A. Whittaker, Robert J. Borges, Paulo A. V. Comparative phylogeography of endemic Azorean arthropods |
title | Comparative phylogeography of endemic Azorean arthropods |
title_full | Comparative phylogeography of endemic Azorean arthropods |
title_fullStr | Comparative phylogeography of endemic Azorean arthropods |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative phylogeography of endemic Azorean arthropods |
title_short | Comparative phylogeography of endemic Azorean arthropods |
title_sort | comparative phylogeography of endemic azorean arthropods |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4642780/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26559388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-015-0523-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parmakelisaristeidis comparativephylogeographyofendemicazoreanarthropods AT rigalfrancois comparativephylogeographyofendemicazoreanarthropods AT mourikisthanos comparativephylogeographyofendemicazoreanarthropods AT balanikakaterina comparativephylogeographyofendemicazoreanarthropods AT terzopoulousofia comparativephylogeographyofendemicazoreanarthropods AT regocarla comparativephylogeographyofendemicazoreanarthropods AT amorimisabelr comparativephylogeographyofendemicazoreanarthropods AT crespoluis comparativephylogeographyofendemicazoreanarthropods AT pereirafernando comparativephylogeographyofendemicazoreanarthropods AT triantiskostasa comparativephylogeographyofendemicazoreanarthropods AT whittakerrobertj comparativephylogeographyofendemicazoreanarthropods AT borgespauloav comparativephylogeographyofendemicazoreanarthropods |